(07-17-2021, 12:46 PM)NOMAD Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 11:18 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: Hi @Shannon,

Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?

What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?

At this point - is it still considered experimental?

Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it  to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.

I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.

For $114.95
Shannon produces...
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in MP3

2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in FLAC

Also, he needs a drive large enough to store all this digital information.

That is a lot of work for 1 person!!

Yep. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

That doesn't change the fact that hybrid is more effective for some people such as myself and for some that run into a rough patch of resistance. So again, I hope that a Shannon doesn't discontinue the hybrid format.

(07-17-2021, 01:11 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 12:46 PM)NOMAD Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 11:18 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: Hi @Shannon,

Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?

What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?

At this point - is it still considered experimental?

Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it  to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.

I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.

For $114.95
Shannon produces...
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in MP3

2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in FLAC

Also, he needs a drive large enough to store all this digital information.

That is a lot of work for 1 person!!

Yep. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

That doesn't change the fact that hybrid is more effective for some people such as myself and for some that run into a rough patch of resistance. So again, I hope that a Shannon doesn't discontinue the hybrid format.

My apologies if I offended you!!  Yes, I was pointing out the obvious, some people don't realize the value we are getting for what we are paying.

In my defense, I wasn't aware that Shannon was thinking about ending the hybrid format.

(07-16-2021, 01:07 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: @Shannon Do you have a rough estimate of when you will start working on the Universal Healing sub? Is it in the pipeline?

(07-16-2021, 01:30 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 12:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 12:05 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 11:18 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 10:43 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon 

Regarding the “you supply the goal” program idea, wouldn’t that be what US/LM was? 

I find that idea rather intriguing.

US/LM used that approach, but was not what this program would be.  It was inclusive of manifestation, but it was not the primary (or even secondary) focus of the program, and it was divided into two different parts.

A next gen manifestation program using the "You Pick" concept would be focused 100% on manifesting the consciously chosen goal, as long as it remains the focus of concentration and desire.  That is a blessing and a curse, because so many of you now have had your ability to focus and maintain focus so badly damaged by social media that you can't maintain a desire for more than days or weeks at a time in a lot of cases, and so in the hands of such a person, no result would ever happen because they would constantly be beginning a new manifestation as each new "shiny" caught their attention, interested them and distracted them.  The next program, for example.

But it is a blessing because it would effectively create (If I can and do create it) a sort of universal wish fulfillment program.  One program would allow you to manifest anything you want, and re-use it again and again, focusing on a different goal each time.

Of course it may or may not be possible, or wise, to create such a thing.

@Shannon 

I see the risks associated with such a program. Would the goal manifest faster using a next-gen program assuming that one kept focus on it for the necessary time? 

It will be interesting to see how this pans out in the future.

I don't have enough information on the specifics of the skeleton script used, settings, configurations, scripting options, etc. to be able to answer that.

@Shannon 

Oh ok. 

I never used the prior manifestation subs. Were they effective?

(07-16-2021, 05:18 PM)Benjamin Wrote: So with UMS V2 you wouldn't come up with a conscious goal at all? (eg amount of money).

My current thoughts are that i've tried setting different goals with different methods and my money limitations/beliefs are so messed up that even amounts that aren't that big really feel out of reach for me in reality.

So I massively reduced the goal planning to meet that and then increase it, only to not reach it and just give up on the money number and just focus on my general 'mission' that I want to achieve through my business.

Not much i've tried until now has really helped shift my money programming past small realizations of some other things I can do that haven't really amounted to results.

Pretty much just finishing up something else and I have to really decide between OF V3 and UMS V2. Very hard choice. Fear is definately one of my big issues holding me back, but also lack of money to move forward in big areas of my life.

(07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: Hi @Shannon,

Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?

What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?

At this point - is it still considered experimental?

(07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: Hi @Shannon,

Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?

What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?

At this point - is it still considered experimental?

Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it  to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.

I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.

(07-17-2021, 11:18 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 07:44 AM)NOMAD Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 05:10 AM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: Hi @Shannon,

Have you made any observations or reached any conclusions regarding the Hybrid format of 5.75.7G?

What I mean to ask is - is this format effective and useful for the majority of users? For some users? For you personally?

At this point - is it still considered experimental?

Hybrid is what I use for OFv3, which is 5.75.7G. I use it continually. Others have used it  to overcome bouts of resistance. It's very effective at what it does.

I don't know if Shannon is still considering only producing masked and ultrasonic. I hope not.

For $114.95
Shannon produces...
2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in MP3

2 masked tracks, 1 silent track, 2 hybrid tracks in FLAC

Also, he needs a drive large enough to store all this digital information.

That is a lot of work for 1 person!!

(07-17-2021, 12:22 PM)Z-Man Wrote: Shannon, I have a 32GB Agptek mp3 and it plays flac files. When I played subliminal off of sd card it doesn't play it perfectly through the whole track. On the main player it plays it fine. It doesn't happen with music files. I thought it was defective and they sent me a new one and it does the same thing. Have you ever heard of that?  Do you think it is the player or it just can't handle connection with subliminal off the card?

I never had that problem before. What do you think?

(07-17-2021, 04:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 01:30 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 12:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 12:05 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 11:18 AM)Shannon Wrote: US/LM used that approach, but was not what this program would be.  It was inclusive of manifestation, but it was not the primary (or even secondary) focus of the program, and it was divided into two different parts.

A next gen manifestation program using the "You Pick" concept would be focused 100% on manifesting the consciously chosen goal, as long as it remains the focus of concentration and desire.  That is a blessing and a curse, because so many of you now have had your ability to focus and maintain focus so badly damaged by social media that you can't maintain a desire for more than days or weeks at a time in a lot of cases, and so in the hands of such a person, no result would ever happen because they would constantly be beginning a new manifestation as each new "shiny" caught their attention, interested them and distracted them.  The next program, for example.

But it is a blessing because it would effectively create (If I can and do create it) a sort of universal wish fulfillment program.  One program would allow you to manifest anything you want, and re-use it again and again, focusing on a different goal each time.

Of course it may or may not be possible, or wise, to create such a thing.

@Shannon 

I see the risks associated with such a program. Would the goal manifest faster using a next-gen program assuming that one kept focus on it for the necessary time? 

It will be interesting to see how this pans out in the future.

I don't have enough information on the specifics of the skeleton script used, settings, configurations, scripting options, etc. to be able to answer that.

@Shannon 

Oh ok. 

I never used the prior manifestation subs. Were they effective?

They were if you used them properly, executed them and didn't self sabotage.  Unfortunately, 80-90% of people failed on one or more of those requirements.  Usually it was self sabotage.

(07-17-2021, 07:14 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 04:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 01:30 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 12:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 12:05 PM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon 

I see the risks associated with such a program. Would the goal manifest faster using a next-gen program assuming that one kept focus on it for the necessary time? 

It will be interesting to see how this pans out in the future.

I don't have enough information on the specifics of the skeleton script used, settings, configurations, scripting options, etc. to be able to answer that.

@Shannon 

Oh ok. 

I never used the prior manifestation subs. Were they effective?

They were if you used them properly, executed them and didn't self sabotage.  Unfortunately, 80-90% of people failed on one or more of those requirements.  Usually it was self sabotage.

@Shannon 

Ah ok 

It will be interesting to see how the next manifestation subs turn out. 

FRM should make a big big difference I would think

(07-19-2021, 02:58 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon,once youre done with this  Program,E5, I think its going to be intensely powerful and very very beneficial ,to say da least!!

Shannon's quote:
"I'm about to finish calculating toe settings from the FRM in E5, and then I have to figure out the settings for DRS. I doubt at this point that I'll finish doing DRS today, but we are very close to finished doing config work, so hopefully that's done tomorrow and then I can start building this thing.

The config coming out of the models tells me this is probably not going to be a program that goes un-noticed."