Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AlphaRomeo - 11-09-2018

@Benjamin
Knock, knock.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 02:30 PM)Benjamin Wrote: UMOP2 links are up. Wink
@Benjamin Hey buddy I downloaded v2 45mins before you posted the above.

Everything seems to check out with the MD5sum check thing too.

So was it up 45mins ago before you wrote the above?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 01:38 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon Hey, I just wanted to ask is the plan for 3.3 to still have it come out by November 20th even if you weren't able to add everything you wanted?

I'm planning to work on it until my gut tells me it's good to release. If that happens on or about the 20th, great. If not, I'll keep going.

Quote:Also, there were two other question I had. Were you able to fully update the Magnus engine?

I haven't had the chance to work on that yet.

Quote:I remember you kept saying that was going to be the most time consuming part. Also, on the reality bending side were you able to find any other ways to improve the reality bending? Or have you pushed it as far as you safely can?

Reality bending is at v5.1, and that's as far as I know how to push it right now without causing problems.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ianmarconi - 11-09-2018

Can someone confirm that the break after E2 is only one week(and not 21+ days as the other 5.5G subs require)? @Shannon @Benjamin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 02:31 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: @Benjamin
Knock, knock.

Haha, whos there?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 02:33 PM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(11-09-2018, 02:30 PM)Benjamin Wrote: UMOP2 links are up. Wink
@Benjamin Hey buddy I downloaded v2 45mins before you posted the above.

Everything seems to check out with the MD5sum check thing too.

So was it up 45mins ago before you wrote the above?

Yeah I had done it a bit before posting, I was doing other things then thought I better make a post. It says V2 in the filename.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 02:37 PM)ianmarconi Wrote: Can someone confirm that the break after E2 is only one week(and not 21+ days as the other 5.5G subs require)? @Shannon @Benjamin

Yes a week is fine for E2.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 02:37 PM)ianmarconi Wrote: Can someone confirm that the break after E2 is only one week(and not 21+ days as the other 5.5G subs require)? @Shannon @Benjamin

E2 does not have P5/P6. A good rule of thumb in that case is Generation + 1 day per month of use.

E2 is the first 5.5G sub, which rounds up to 6 days off. Then add one day rest for each month of use.

Most people just do a week.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AlphaRomeo - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 02:43 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
(11-09-2018, 02:31 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: @Benjamin
Knock, knock.

Haha, whos there?

"Reverse home delivery", I was about to say.
I was close, but you were faster. Check the timestamps of our earlier posts...you delivered and I didn´t even see, while being busy knocking the door lol.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 02:34 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-09-2018, 01:38 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon Hey, I just wanted to ask is the plan for 3.3 to still have it come out by November 20th even if you weren't able to add everything you wanted?

I'm planning to work on it until my gut tells me it's good to release. If that happens on or about the 20th, great. If not, I'll keep going.

Quote:Also, there were two other question I had. Were you able to fully update the Magnus engine?

I haven't had the chance to work on that yet.

Quote:I remember you kept saying that was going to be the most time consuming part. Also, on the reality bending side were you able to find any other ways to improve the reality bending? Or have you pushed it as far as you safely can?

Reality bending is at v5.1, and that's as far as I know how to push it right now without causing problems.

For DMSI 3.2, which version of reality bending was it at? Was it v2 or v3?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - 4Kingdoms - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 01:38 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon Hey, I just wanted to ask is the plan for 3.3 to still have it come out by November 20th even if you weren't able to add everything you wanted?
(11-09-2018, 02:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm planning to work on it until my gut tells me it's good to release. If that happens on or about the 20th, great. If not, I'll keep going.

Quote:Also, there were two other question I had. Were you able to fully update the Magnus engine?

I haven't had the chance to work on that yet.

Quote:I remember you kept saying that was going to be the most time consuming part. Also, on the reality bending side were you able to find any other ways to improve the reality bending? Or have you pushed it as far as you safely can?

Reality bending is at v5.1, and that's as far as I know how to push it right now without causing problems.
(11-09-2018, 03:45 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: For DMSI 3.2, which version of reality bending was it at? Was it v2 or v3?

http://www.subliminal-shop.com/product/develop-maximum-sexual-irresistibility-3-2-a-b/
Product Description:
– DMSI 3.2 Change Log –
38. Upgraded Reality Bending to V5.0


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - apollolux - 11-09-2018

@Shannon I don't know if I might be in the minority or not, but I'm cool with the possibility of DMSI 3.3 not being ready by November 20. WordPress 5.0 is slated for release Nov 16 or so and they still have hundreds of outstanding bugs they want to take care of before then, and that's a team of a few main devs and anywhere from a dozen to maybe a hundred decently skilled open-source contributors on top of that. You're one guy and I could understand if simply the amount of work alone, not to mention other possible real-world factors, might result in taking longer than the last week or two of this month.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 11-09-2018

(11-09-2018, 07:37 PM)apollolux Wrote: @Shannon I don't know if I might be in the minority or not, but I'm cool with the possibility of DMSI 3.3 not being ready by November 20. WordPress 5.0 is slated for release Nov 16 or so and they still have hundreds of outstanding bugs they want to take care of before then, and that's a team of a few main devs and anywhere from a dozen to maybe a hundred decently skilled open-source contributors on top of that. You're one guy and I could understand if simply the amount of work alone, not to mention other possible real-world factors, might result in taking longer than the last week or two of this month.

I appreciate that.

Things are not done here the way other subliminal producers do them. Gone are the days when I could just write a script and optimize it by hand and then build it. In those days, I could build a program relatively quickly. Now it can sometimes take me days to craft a single sentence correctly, looking through literally hundreds of possible variants to get the highest possible levels of optimization.

I don't go to quite that degree very often, because it is rarely necessary, but it can easily take me 6 to 12 hours just to get one statement fully developed.

And a module may contain between 1 and more than 24 statements.

On top of that, consider that there are multiple sections of script (Pre-Script, Key Script, Core Script, Skeleton Script Body at the least) and that each one contains multiple modules, sometimes numbering more than a hundred.

Then consider that upgrading DMSI means I have to adjust, change, optimize, add to and/or replace some or all of each of those sections, with multiple modules each, usually having multiple statements each, without breaking inter-operability and inter-dependencies.

Finally, in DMSI, each statement can be pages of text long. So it's not exactly easy to work with them and maintain grammatic correctness. Even after all these years of doing this, I have to work on each statement in staggered sections that overlap to make sure the grammar is perfect.

And then you have the fact that I have a life, just like anyone else, and shit likes to happen to me.

So I had to build USLM3 and UMOP2 before working on DMSI 3.3 again, and that is done, and I spent the rest of today resting. I almost burned myself out trying to get all that done so fast.

Now I will resume working on DMSI 3.3, but I don't want to release it without having made enough improvements to it to be worth my time and yours. There is a lot left to do, so I'll be working hard, but setting deadlines when it's not absolutely necessary tends to result in dissapointment.

Of course I know there are some of you who think I'm silly for not using deadlines more often, but I know two things are true when it comes to deadlines.

First, they almost always result in less good quality than just working steadily until the job is done.

Second, I personally don't do well with deadlines.

So since you guys are waiting for something good, we might as well work on it right and do what it takes to get the best results we can get.

That said, I don't know when it will be finished; it might be on or about the 20th, still. Or it may be later. But for those of you who have a problem with it taking so long, I can only say that in my shoes you would be in the same position.

Doing it right is better than doing it fast. Complaints on this can be filed in the circular file. Working at my own pace, and in my own way, is how I achieve programs worth paying what we charge for them.

You guys are going to see what DMSI Final is like soon enough. It's not too terribly far off at this point. Especially with this cycle ending at the end of December. Maybe then, we can return to building it every couple of months.

I am definitely ready to be done with DMSI AND developing 6G!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - TheGreatAttractor - 11-10-2018

(11-09-2018, 08:03 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-09-2018, 07:37 PM)apollolux Wrote: @Shannon I don't know if I might be in the minority or not, but I'm cool with the possibility of DMSI 3.3 not being ready by November 20. WordPress 5.0 is slated for release Nov 16 or so and they still have hundreds of outstanding bugs they want to take care of before then, and that's a team of a few main devs and anywhere from a dozen to maybe a hundred decently skilled open-source contributors on top of that. You're one guy and I could understand if simply the amount of work alone, not to mention other possible real-world factors, might result in taking longer than the last week or two of this month.

I appreciate that.

Things are not done here the way other subliminal producers do them. Gone are the days when I could just write a script and optimize it by hand and then build it. In those days, I could build a program relatively quickly. Now it can sometimes take me days to craft a single sentence correctly, looking through literally hundreds of possible variants to get the highest possible levels of optimization.

I don't go to quite that degree very often, because it is rarely necessary, but it can easily take me 6 to 12 hours just to get one statement fully developed.

And a module may contain between 1 and more than 24 statements.

On top of that, consider that there are multiple sections of script (Pre-Script, Key Script, Core Script, Skeleton Script Body at the least) and that each one contains multiple modules, sometimes numbering more than a hundred.

Then consider that upgrading DMSI means I have to adjust, change, optimize, add to and/or replace some or all of each of those sections, with multiple modules each, usually having multiple statements each, without breaking inter-operability and inter-dependencies.

Finally, in DMSI, each statement can be pages of text long. So it's not exactly easy to work with them and maintain grammatic correctness. Even after all these years of doing this, I have to work on each statement in staggered sections that overlap to make sure the grammar is perfect.

And then you have the fact that I have a life, just like anyone else, and shit likes to happen to me.

So I had to build USLM3 and UMOP2 before working on DMSI 3.3 again, and that is done, and I spent the rest of today resting. I almost burned myself out trying to get all that done so fast.

Now I will resume working on DMSI 3.3, but I don't want to release it without having made enough improvements to it to be worth my time and yours. There is a lot left to do, so I'll be working hard, but setting deadlines when it's not absolutely necessary tends to result in dissapointment.

Of course I know there are some of you who think I'm silly for not using deadlines more often, but I know two things are true when it comes to deadlines.

First, they almost always result in less good quality than just working steadily until the job is done.

Second, I personally don't do well with deadlines.

So since you guys are waiting for something good, we might as well work on it right and do what it takes to get the best results we can get.

That said, I don't know when it will be finished; it might be on or about the 20th, still. Or it may be later. But for those of you who have a problem with it taking so long, I can only say that in my shoes you would be in the same position.

Doing it right is better than doing it fast. Complaints on this can be filed in the circular file. Working at my own pace, and in my own way, is how I achieve programs worth paying what we charge for them.

You guys are going to see what DMSI Final is like soon enough. It's not too terribly far off at this point. Especially with this cycle ending at the end of December. Maybe then, we can return to building it every couple of months.

I am definitely ready to be done with DMSI AND developing 6G!

@Shannon

Have you considered looking into some form of automation to help you reduce your workload? I think AutoIt might be a good place to start