Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 07-09-2016 Quote:As to the anger some of you have felt, that is almost certainly an increase in testosterone and/or the pheromone androstenone. Other parts of the script should temper it in the right ways to result in achieving the goals of the program. Shannon, wouldn't it be better to leave this in to help with overall drive, sex drive, confidence, and of course pheromones? I know when my dad started testosterone replacement he had a short temper for about a week and then went back to normal. Same with guys who try pheromones for the first time and they use a heavy androstenone blend. The first 4 or 5 times they struggle with it but then go back to normal once they get used to it. I would hate to risk anything tempering my testosterone levels, I was at 585 and managed to get up to 893 with weight loss and vitamin d/k/e/a and microdosing dhea and the difference is pretty big for me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:30 AM)Vincent_Vega Wrote:(07-08-2016, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. Didn't I explain why not in the very post you responded to? Here, I'll be more specific. I release 3 versions of DMSI V2.2. Refund or not, someone is going to be stupid and try to use version X for a week, decide he really wants to use version Y, and then cause both to fail because they conflict in his mind. Then he's going to jump to version Z, get the same results for the same reason, and publicly bash DMSI and me and everyone else because how dare I charge that much money for something that "obviously doesn't work". So you see, I am forced to protect you all, and myself, from the stupidity of a small group of people. "This is why we can't have nice tings." RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:53 AM)dissonance Wrote: Is it ok to listen to the 5 loops not consecutively, but rather spread out in the day? Like 2 loops here, 2 loops a few hours later, 1 loop later? I'm one of those that don't like listening to subs while sleeping. You could do that, but it breaks ASRB, and really lowers the power of the program. It's not designed or intended for that, and I strongly recommend against it. Effectively you are introducing a secondary ASRB by doing that, which is completely random. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 08:57 AM)dissonance Wrote: Shannon, when AM7 comes out, is it gonna be single stage or multi-stage? Or you don't know yet? Multi-stage. Too complex for single stage. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dubls - 07-09-2016 (04-21-2016, 02:41 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Shannon I've just read your post on you working on a new AOS and I would like to suggest the following: I'm working from April 2016 to present so bear with me if this has been discussed, but I strongly disagree with your third suggestion. The idea of being able to turn it on and off at will (if that's even possible to program in) is a variable that I think will detract, if not sabotage, the efficacy of the program. This program is engineered—with 5.5G technology no less—to instill a powerful state of being that most of us are attracted to because it is not our reality. We want to achieve something that may have been impossible or painfully slow to attain otherwise. Think about the hottest girls you've seen (the ones you're using this program to try to have sex with): they can't turn it off. It's who they are and they deal with it every day. And for all the hassle, think about the enormous power they wield. If you want this to work, then it needs to be congruent with who you are, because if there's one thing women can smell its dissonance. In my opinion, if you can 'turn it off' then it's not a genuine part of you, and you won't maximize your sexual irresistibility as the title suggests. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:07 AM)sawell54 Wrote:(07-09-2016, 06:14 AM)terry44 Wrote:(07-09-2016, 05:56 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(07-09-2016, 04:02 AM)CatMan Wrote:(07-09-2016, 03:57 AM)terry44 Wrote: Yes, they call men superficial and yet are incredibly impressed by height. And when I was younger and used to go clubbing with a group of people I knew, my black friends did so much better than my white or Asian friends. I mean women used to literally chat them up, but look right through the rest of us. I think what might be happening is that women are taught that Black men always have huge dicks compared to Caucasian or Asian men. I don't know how true this is, and I don't care, but it's a factor to consider. You should also know that Black men produce the most intense androstenone signature of all the races, and therefore they DO things most other races don't do, and they get sexual reactions most other races don't get. Black men naturally produce more of the primary aggression and sexual attraction pheromone, which gives them a lot more self confidence in general (regardless of how other factors may mitigate or derail this one) and makes them more sexually attractive to women - especially women who are within range of that level of androstenone to not be totally intimidated by it (as Asian women tend to be). In other words, Black men will be pheromonally most naturally attractive to Black women first, Hispanic women second and White women third. But all this is generalizing so much as to be generally useless and difficult to observe in real life, because there are way too many important factors to consider. I'm just pointing out this one. I think personally that Black men who choose to make themselves successful tend to have the most respect for that among all the races, because generally they do face more challenges than other races. But I would say that a lot of the challenges they face are self inflicted, based on beliefs that they can't, when they can. Anyone who decides to be successful and refuses to be anything else can be. I don't care what color your skin is, because it's not skin color that changes the world, its what reality you tune into with your beliefs and their resultant ourward reality. Which is one big reason why, Chaos, using, focusing on and harboring negative emotions is self destructive instead of useful. They may be good for motivation, but they align you vibrationally with a world view of strife which tunes you into a world where that strife is what you wanted it to be - or what your subconscious understood your conscious mind to be requesting, regardless of how erroroneous that "understanding" is. But believe me, while I am not a Black man, and I have not dealt with anywhere near as much racism as you have, there are things I still struggle to release 20+ years later that have made me incredibly angry. I can tell you, though, that releasing anger has always made my life better, not worse. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:11 AM)sawell54 Wrote: Anybody noticing increased luck on dmsi? maybe its coincidences Or OE... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:32 AM)Voytek Wrote: From Shannon`s journal: Generally, women say they want and consciously believe they want what society and religion tell them is acceptable to want. What they really want is what all humans want, because all humans are ... well, as a race, we are the second most sexual creatures on the planet, only exceeded by Bonobo monkeys, who actually use full on impregnation sex as a greeting, farewell, and for many other purposes. W - - - - s, all of us. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:59 AM)Ricardo Wrote: I don't know if nailing it down to simply hard, medium or soft is a good idea anyway, because if you see a women who you want, you aren't going to know which category she falls into and consequently if you are using the wrong 'grade' you won't attract her..same for women after men etc. I wasn't nailing it down. I was reporting what types of women responded best to the three options I was trying to achieve universal appeal with. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 10:02 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(07-09-2016, 09:48 AM)Sickologist Wrote: Chaos, which Korine movies do you recommend? Spring Breakers was fucked up. Totally. But some good parts. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 12:21 PM)Hercules Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:37 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:(07-09-2016, 09:40 AM)Hercules Wrote:(07-09-2016, 08:57 AM)dissonance Wrote: Shannon, when AM7 comes out, is it gonna be single stage or multi-stage? Or you don't know yet? Then tell people that it's a guestimation, don't make it sound like you're speaking established fact. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 04:37 PM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: Shannon, just wondering, if I eventually switched to E2, would the momentum of E2 components in MSI carry over? Yes. Quote:I know you said they are tweaked, but just wondering if them E2 components are so tweaked it's like starting a complete new script? No. Quote:Also in MSI is the OGSF only directed towards GSF of the main goals of the program or is it possible for it to touch on areas outside of the goals of the program? Not sure how much OGSF is "guided". It's the exact same scripting, word for word, as in E2. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:46 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(07-09-2016, 05:25 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Really Chaosvrgn? Yes obviously you disagree and that's cool. But starting to attack members by calling them retards, stupid ass and comapring them to Elliot Rogers isn't. Chaos, I understand why you're angry. I don't understand it from the point of view of an angry black man, having not had your experiences. But I can see that what you have spoken about represents genuine and repeated injustice. However, we are trying to be a community. If you voice your concerns, please do so in accordance with the rules. Instead of directing your anger at people, do what I do. If you must, write a post blasting the hell out of them, get it out, and then erase that and write one that is civil. But please understand this is a community, and we want everyone to try to value everyone else's position and opinion. No matter what we think of it. I certainly don't agree with everyone on everything, and sometimes I think some of the things I read on here qualify for the Darwin award. Sometimes, I even disagree with you, although I have never thought you deserved the Darwin award. But I still treat you with respect, partly because you're a customer, but also partly because I am following forum rules, and partly because I respect you for various other reasons. If out of nothing else, please respect the rules. Civil debate is always more effective anyway, since your opponents in the debate will be more willing to listen to what you have to say and consider it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - sawell54 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:12 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote:(07-09-2016, 09:11 AM)sawell54 Wrote: Anybody noticing increased luck on dmsi? maybe its coincidences finding money randomly, a older white woman gave me 10 bucks for giving her directions to a small convenience store, a girl i havent met in months aggressively a made date with me on fb even after she said no to me asking for her # on fb weeks ago randomly messaged me Friday and aggressively made a date with me, another girl i gave up on randomly texted me, women are contacting me online more.. it might just be a coincidence |