![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 04:01 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: If I do weed will it help EPHRA 2.0? Sort of like how Darth used MDMA to enhance E2? I don't really like weed, but if it gave me an edge I would be open to trying it with E2. No. weed will not help you with E2. It will, in fact, have the reverse effect. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 04:03 PM)DisneylandUSA Wrote:(07-06-2016, 03:55 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toBut what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them? Sadly, what you like and what works are not always the same thing. I am frequently surprised by the models in that regard. I come up with what I think is the perfect wording, and they consistently pick something that seems like nothing special to me. But when I test it, my preferred one does what the models said it would and fails, and the one the models picked succeeds. So it sucks to be us. I have two options that rate high enough now. Still looking. The final that gets used will be the one that rates highest in a comparison of all of the finalists. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 04:16 PM)Boozy32 Wrote:(07-06-2016, 04:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-06-2016, 05:36 AM)Boozy32 Wrote: Hey shannon, A good volume is the volume at which you calibrate it by following the instructions for calibrating it. ![]() Accelerated breathing is simply a sign of stress and fear. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-06-2016 I just seen this potential scripting. Quote:all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them I can't say that makes sense to me, cos then it would point to people who already want to have sex with you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 07-06-2016 all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them I like that option better , because you can always ask for the age of the consenting person. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 07-06-2016 Hi Shannon, I like this line for DMSI/AOSI/DAOSI/CNN/HUGDIHX/WHATEVER "all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them", rather than the age limiter statement if I had to choose between them even though I think a lot of wording in it is unnecessary. Many countries have different age consent laws, and under different situations, so it's unlikely people would somehow inherently know what age a person is and somehow know what age is legal or not in whatever country they're in and what circumstances. I'd rather not have a lawyer in my head. Seems like it would just inhibit performance and complicate it's process, like maybe if a girl looks younger than she is etc., similar to how the earlier sexual orientation limiters did. I'd really prefer not having a minefield like age limiting in the sub, that could ruin it for someone like me who travels a lot and countries have vastly different laws. Please don't put something like that in there. Let's get the sub to the point of actually working as advertised, before we nerf it down with conditions before it starts to work. Makes sense to me. But on this statement, another thing I didn't understand, is how would it work? If attractive women are out there and don't seem to be sexually interested now, then how can the sub work? Isn't it supposed to work by US wanting THEM, then the sub works it's magic? So making the other person the catalyst, I'm not sure how that would work. If unattractive girls are coming onto me and instigating because of this statement, because they're the catalyst now rather than me, that isn't desirable. I have to be attracted first, for anything further to matter. So, something like: "all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to", isn't that enough? Seems obvious enough to me, I don't have much interest in little girls, nor do I have much interest in grannies. But, from 16ish up, to maybe 35ish or so, I'm good. That's more than legal here, so nobody hate. I think most people don't really need such age limiters to tell them what they should be attracted to, people already know what they're attracted to. Anyway, looking forward to 2.2. Like the rest of the forum, lol. I might make the switch to 2.2, and finally announce the superfight of DMSI V2.2 vs. CatMan, for the V Card Heavyweight Championship Title, Live on HBO. "Heayweight Champion Of The WWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRLLLLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!" RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 05:01 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I just seen this potential scripting. That's the point , so those people make themselves more obviously known. Some people may want to have sex with you but may pretend to not want it , because of insecurities , guilt , shame and fear. The sub will expose these people and will facilitate sex with the user. It's all about using your subconscious for faster sex. No? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 05:08 PM)Womanizer Wrote:(07-06-2016, 05:01 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I just seen this potential scripting. No. It takes too much power away from the user. Any time you take responsibility out of your hands in life shit gets ugly. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 05:07 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon, I thought this too when I read the statement. Can you elaborate on exactly what it means Shannon? And will we know the statement you end up going with when you build 2.2? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-06-2016 And the legal age thing, half the time it's really hard to tell age and somehow, probably due to fear I assume "oh they may be too young". If you have no idea how old they are is it just going to filter them out because of that. Cos in reality they may not be. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 07-06-2016 Shannon can you put a script in regards to controlling ejaculation into dmsi 2.2. I mean if this is a sex sub this would help us premature ejaculators out there. Dang it i have yet to commit to using the premature ejaculation 5g sub. I'm always thinking you might do a 5.5 version of it so i hold off on it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-06-2016 Shannon, Regarding: "all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them" In some form or another, I think I'm with Ben on this one... If a person is "plain" looking, poorly dressed, and socially nervous, there will be likely be a smaller pool of possibilities for such a user of the program. On the other hand: "all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to" might be a larger pool of more desirable possibilities. Now if the program was oriented to have "all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to want to seduce me into having sex with them"... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-06-2016 It's kind of like that statement presupposes it will only work on people who already wanted to have sex with you before you used the program as opposed to finding new people who want to. And like Steven said that would severely limit it if you're someone who doesn't have alot of people who already want to have sex with you. That's what that sentence communicates to me anyway. I like ""all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to"" better. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 05:34 PM)Benjamin Wrote: And the legal age thing, half the time it's really hard to tell age and somehow, probably due to fear I assume "oh they may be too young". If you have no idea how old they are is it just going to filter them out because of that. Cos in reality they may not be. When I was 18 I had this milf who was a friends mom , who asked for my age but she didn't believe me when I said I was 18. So she asked me to prove it by me showing my ID to her. So I did I ended up hooking up with her , and the girls I brought with me I (pawned) her to her son pua term here , for better lack of word. So you can just ask for an ID. Plus it's a great conversation starter, hey I find you cute are you 18? Simple and cut through the bs. |