Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 12:13 AM)guarimen Wrote: it's been a while i use base 2.0 and i want to upgrade it to 2.1 Yes, I believe it's 80 or 120 minutes. The MD5 sums will either be in a text file with the download, or I have not calculated them. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 02:10 AM)"Q Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toIs there any possibility (from word rate increases, and text-to-audio technology) that the user's brain hears "attractive", instead of "attracted". i.e. if the words per minute have been increased so much that the specific word can sound ambiguous on the resulting audio track, or at least the user hears it ambiguously, so interprets it as "attractive". If there is a possibility of that happening, that is a big change in dynamic to what the target will be. I suspect it might already have an influence on V2.1. I already modeled both phrasings. There was a big difference in results, clearly indicating that the subconscious fully understands each one as intended. The singular of the word gender applies to all individual instances within a multiplicity. For example, let's say that we have a user who buys into the facebook idea of 50+ "genders", and they have decided that they are attracted to 37 of these 50+ "genders". The subconscious hears the word "gender" and does this: "Is this person of the gender I find attractive? I don't know if they even know about all these genders, and I don't know what gender they claim for themselves, so I have to consider the probability that they would choose a gender I don't know about. Therefore, I will presume that they are or are not of the gender I am attracted to by their physical sexual characteristics." If the person has a beard and tits, and this is something you are sexually attracted to, then guess what happens? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:36 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-06-2016, 02:10 AM)"Q Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toIs there any possibility (from word rate increases, and text-to-audio technology) that the user's brain hears "attractive", instead of "attracted". i.e. if the words per minute have been increased so much that the specific word can sound ambiguous on the resulting audio track, or at least the user hears it ambiguously, so interprets it as "attractive". If there is a possibility of that happening, that is a big change in dynamic to what the target will be. I suspect it might already have an influence on V2.1. Beard-goggles? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toBut what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them? Good old Swisston, always the contrarian. Willing to have sex with, and want to, or ready to, or going to, not the same thing. But, I would say that the goals of this program conflict with what you want. So unless I find a way to override your fears and resultant resistance, and cause you to act on opportunities that result regardless of your LTR, you are likely to get nowhere because you won't allow yourself to execute the script because it's goal directly conflicts with yours! I personally don't think it will ever be possible for me to please all of you. If I try to please those of you who are single, then those of you who are involved will be unhappy. If I try to do the reverse, then the unhappiness inverts with it. I am aiming this at pleasing the majority. If we attract everyone of the gender you are attracted to, the models show an almost neutral response from the user base. On a scale of -10 to +10, it rated a +1. This is likely because there is so much energy going out that results are not great, and lots of undesired people are responding. I have modeled your suggestions, and several variants, and this is what I find. Your original suggestion rates a +5 in the model on the aforementioned scale. I will not accept anything less than +8. Secondary suggestion rates +3. I took the liberty of exploring various other wordings, and found one that rates +9, equal to the one I already mentioned. This one has been accepted for consideration: Quote:all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:49 AM)jacksonchandra Wrote: I just read Shannon's Journal about hours ago and He said that some people just disappointed with DMSI 2.1. Why? There are people who do not understand that when something is "in testing", it's not finished yet and may not produce the desired results, or may not produced them as quickly as possible. There are people who don't understand that something might not be instant in it's effect. It might take time to build up. Some people expect everything to be instant gratification. There are those people who assume that everything I put out has to be perfect, because I have only released finished products in the past, instead of letting you guys test. Some people are using this as an opportunity to "prove" or "disprove" subliminals. etc. etc. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DisneylandUSA - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:16 PM)Hercules Wrote: I've been using EPHRA for 4 months now and I can attest to the monk nature of this sub. It's really making time pass by until late I release enough trauma to start a new beginning. Although I have encountered unpleasant experiences with this sub I realize that the subconscious knows best and these experiences will help me in the end to grow. I want to be emotionaly free 100% and stop absorbing the negative traumas from other people. I guess I am supposed to take on others pain and transmute it but that is a whole other story. Interesting about 'taking on others pain' scenario. Different people have a Gift, of 'Empath.' Perhaps, you can look it up and research it RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 04:18 AM)Jones Wrote:(07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toBut what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them? I modeled want to, consciously want to, subconsciously want to, consciously and subconsciously want to, and all of those variants for willing to as well. None passed. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DisneylandUSA - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:55 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toBut what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them? I kind of like the 'willing to have sex with' script : RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 05:36 AM)Boozy32 Wrote: Hey shannon, Obviously there is something you are afraid of in either being successful or being "lucky". Bad dreams usually result when there is fear of or conflict with the goal of the program or stage you are doing. 6 hours each, one during the night and one during the day sounds reasonable. Just make sure they have equal amounts of time between each (6 hours, in this case). 6 hours US, 6 hours nothing, 6 hours LM, 6 hours nothing. If you're feeling heavy an getting a headache, that can be be because of resistance, overvoluming, or overlistening. I would say overvolume and resistance sound like the most likely explanations to me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 06:36 AM)Havana Wrote: I don't know much about auras, so here's a couple questions. I believe that my subconscious protected me from opening up to people and being social because of my sensitive nature and being hurt in the past. This resulted in many years of loneliness and depression. Is it possible I have developed a "protective" aura of unfriendliness/unapproachability? If so, is this my "default" aura? If after few months I stop using an aura-generating sub, will it revert back? Or is it possible to have no aura whatsoever? It's likely that you are protecting yourself through body language, actions, choices, attitudes,tuning your energy, and other things. And if that is the case and you get these results for years, then yes, that would be your default communication. It would likely revert back unless you overwrite or heal what is causing it now. Everyone has an aura, simply as a result of being alive, regardless of what they want. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DisneylandUSA - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 10:21 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:(07-06-2016, 05:55 AM)coldfact Wrote:(07-06-2016, 04:14 AM)swisston Wrote: I'm pretty confident, but have never felt sexually desirable, despite being in good shape and not bad looking. I want to to be sexually attractive to women. That may indeed be for ego to a large extent, but I would also like to see where it leads my life. I am exploring my sexual side a bit more these days.Feel exactly the same way. You are a 'Celebrity' to us RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-06-2016 Quote:it's been a while i use base 2.0 and i want to upgrade it to 2.1 If you have brought the program then the upgrade to 2.1 is free. If you didn't buy it then you probably shouldn't be asking for that kind of help on here. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 09:05 AM)LionKing Wrote:(07-05-2016, 10:13 AM)Shannon Wrote:(07-05-2016, 09:43 AM)Natious Wrote:(07-05-2016, 01:53 AM)LionKing Wrote: ... It is aiming you toward a state in which you are fully healed and living in a way that makes you happy. You have to do what is necessary before what is desired, or you will never have what is desired because you don't have what is necessary to get there. Quote:but I'm just not sure I understand where its taking me enough to trust it It? It is just a set of instructions that will guide you to a state of being healed, and emotionally happy and healthy. I think you "don't trust it" because you want what you want more than you want what you need, and you're afraid you might not be able to get what you want after you get what you need. Build a house on sand, or build it on stone. Takes the same time to build the house itself. But the house lasts a lot longer on stone because that is what it needs to stay strong. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 10:38 AM)Natious Wrote:(07-06-2016, 09:05 AM)LionKing Wrote:(07-05-2016, 10:13 AM)Shannon Wrote:(07-05-2016, 09:43 AM)Natious Wrote:(07-05-2016, 01:53 AM)LionKing Wrote: ... Quote:This might be more suited for older people who are done with all the pursuing of dreams and want to just lay back, feed birds and think about their life. When you have a psychotic break, and you're in a mental hospital, do you go out every night looking for pussy? Or do you stay indoors and rest and work on healing? The program is designed to get you to focus on healing, dealing with what you need to deal with while healing and repairing yourself, and achieving those goals. It is deep internal work. Of course you're going to be pausing everything else. That's what it takes to achieve the goals. By the time you're "done with all the pursuing of dreams and want to just lay back, feed birds and think about their life", it's too late for this program to help you achieve your dreams. Think about that. |