Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-22-2021

(02-22-2021, 02:40 PM)Darkness Wrote: Shot in the dark, how bout psychic ability?

The first sub I ever created was to enhance psychic ability, and it worked well.  At this point, it's not  such a simple situation though.  I'll need to consider a lot of variables to make such a sub these days.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-22-2021

(02-22-2021, 03:52 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I know Shannon will disagree but I just wanted to throw it out there.  Would it be a bad idea to also upgrade the UMS single stage we currently have and give people the option to buy an upgraded single stage but also the 6 stage set?

People (including Shannon) talking about the bad economic climate/sales etc.  What do businesses do in such situations? they adapt.

Instead of keeping things the way they are one must find ways to make the product more accessible.  Just my 2 cents.  I know i'm not the only one that wants an upgraded UMS but doesn't want to listen to a 6 stage/spend the 6 stage money at this point.

My personal preference is not to build another 5.75.xG multi-stage set.  Ever.  I have been weighing whether or not it's a good idea to release it as a single stage, or perhaps do both.  I know some of you want the 6 stage version, and the money's pretty good for doing that, but half a year of slave labor isn't my idea of a good time...  so I'm working on a solution for everyone.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - lano1106 - 02-22-2021

(02-22-2021, 06:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 03:52 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I know Shannon will disagree but I just wanted to throw it out there.  Would it be a bad idea to also upgrade the UMS single stage we currently have and give people the option to buy an upgraded single stage but also the 6 stage set?

People (including Shannon) talking about the bad economic climate/sales etc.  What do businesses do in such situations? they adapt.

Instead of keeping things the way they are one must find ways to make the product more accessible.  Just my 2 cents.  I know i'm not the only one that wants an upgraded UMS but doesn't want to listen to a 6 stage/spend the 6 stage money at this point.

My personal preference is not to build another 5.75.xG multi-stage set.  Ever.  I have been weighing whether or not it's a good idea to release it as a single stage, or perhaps do both.  I know some of you want the 6 stage version, and the money's pretty good for doing that, but half a year of slave labor isn't my idea of a good time...  so I'm working on a solution for everyone.

That is sad to hear. I have done 6 stages program and it is possibly the best subliminal experience that I have ever had. It gives you an additional level of progression feeling and it gives you the motivation to stick with the program for six months as you get something new each month...

Perhaps what you didn't like was to build it as users were running it. Thus it was giving the pressure the release the next stage on time.

Maybe simply putting aside this method of delivery will make the multi-stages program creation something enjoyable for you again...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-22-2021

(02-22-2021, 06:21 PM)sushi521 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 02:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 12:54 PM)sushi521 Wrote: Hey Shannon, any plan to make a lucid dreaming subliminal?

Not right now.  Do you think that would be a popular one?

Lucid dreaming is very popular nowadays, but I guess people don't know about subliminals or IML

Lucid dreaming is not the easiest thing to induce through a subliminal...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-22-2021

(02-22-2021, 08:22 PM)lano1106 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 06:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 03:52 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I know Shannon will disagree but I just wanted to throw it out there.  Would it be a bad idea to also upgrade the UMS single stage we currently have and give people the option to buy an upgraded single stage but also the 6 stage set?

People (including Shannon) talking about the bad economic climate/sales etc.  What do businesses do in such situations? they adapt.

Instead of keeping things the way they are one must find ways to make the product more accessible.  Just my 2 cents.  I know i'm not the only one that wants an upgraded UMS but doesn't want to listen to a 6 stage/spend the 6 stage money at this point.

My personal preference is not to build another 5.75.xG multi-stage set.  Ever.  I have been weighing whether or not it's a good idea to release it as a single stage, or perhaps do both.  I know some of you want the 6 stage version, and the money's pretty good for doing that, but half a year of slave labor isn't my idea of a good time...  so I'm working on a solution for everyone.

That is sad to hear. I have done 6 stages program and it is possibly the best subliminal experience that I have ever had. It gives you an additional level of progression feeling and it gives you the motivation to stick with the program for six months as you get something new each month...

Perhaps what you didn't like was to build it as users were running it. Thus it was giving the pressure the release the next stage on time.

Maybe simply putting aside this method of delivery will make the multi-stages program creation something enjoyable for you again...

What kills 6 stage sets for me in the latest gen tech is the fact that it is so difficult to build, so time consuming and so challenging to do while I am trying to build other things.  I really need to develop some software to help me process the scripts, at least.  It's advanced text manipulation.  I knew how to do that when I was programming, but since I have left programming, the whole game has changed and now even the best programming languages are going to require me to spend 2-3 months working to learn the language well enough to do it, and I just find it incredibly frustrating for the same reason I can't just hire someone to do it for me: I can't let anyone know how I do this.

But the build and scripting is only getting more and more complicated, so I guess it is better to work on that sooner than later.

If the process wasn't nightmare levels of complexity and months of daily tedium ad nauseum... I might not mind it so much.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Darwin - 02-23-2021

(02-22-2021, 08:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 08:22 PM)lano1106 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 06:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 03:52 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I know Shannon will disagree but I just wanted to throw it out there.  Would it be a bad idea to also upgrade the UMS single stage we currently have and give people the option to buy an upgraded single stage but also the 6 stage set?

People (including Shannon) talking about the bad economic climate/sales etc.  What do businesses do in such situations? they adapt.

Instead of keeping things the way they are one must find ways to make the product more accessible.  Just my 2 cents.  I know i'm not the only one that wants an upgraded UMS but doesn't want to listen to a 6 stage/spend the 6 stage money at this point.

My personal preference is not to build another 5.75.xG multi-stage set.  Ever.  I have been weighing whether or not it's a good idea to release it as a single stage, or perhaps do both.  I know some of you want the 6 stage version, and the money's pretty good for doing that, but half a year of slave labor isn't my idea of a good time...  so I'm working on a solution for everyone.

That is sad to hear. I have done 6 stages program and it is possibly the best subliminal experience that I have ever had. It gives you an additional level of progression feeling and it gives you the motivation to stick with the program for six months as you get something new each month...

Perhaps what you didn't like was to build it as users were running it. Thus it was giving the pressure the release the next stage on time.

Maybe simply putting aside this method of delivery will make the multi-stages program creation something enjoyable for you again...

What kills 6 stage sets for me in the latest gen tech is the fact that it is so difficult to build, so time consuming and so challenging to do while I am trying to build other things.  I really need to develop some software to help me process the scripts, at least.  It's advanced text manipulation.  I knew how to do that when I was programming, but since I have left programming, the whole game has changed and now even the best programming languages are going to require me to spend 2-3 months working to learn the language well enough to do it, and I just find it incredibly frustrating for the same reason I can't just hire someone to do it for me: I can't let anyone know how I do this.

But the build and scripting is only getting more and more complicated, so I guess it is better to work on that sooner than later.

If the process wasn't nightmare levels of complexity and months of daily tedium ad nauseum... I might not mind it so much.

Man you're gonna have to trust someone sometime surely - could you do a 'manifest a trusted team member'' or at least commission someone to develop some skeleton code which you can just amend.  I admire your steadfastness and focus but the work sounds hard, and I think for most people would be unsustainable.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 02-23-2021

(02-22-2021, 08:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 08:22 PM)lano1106 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 06:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 03:52 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I know Shannon will disagree but I just wanted to throw it out there.  Would it be a bad idea to also upgrade the UMS single stage we currently have and give people the option to buy an upgraded single stage but also the 6 stage set?

People (including Shannon) talking about the bad economic climate/sales etc.  What do businesses do in such situations? they adapt.

Instead of keeping things the way they are one must find ways to make the product more accessible.  Just my 2 cents.  I know i'm not the only one that wants an upgraded UMS but doesn't want to listen to a 6 stage/spend the 6 stage money at this point.

My personal preference is not to build another 5.75.xG multi-stage set.  Ever.  I have been weighing whether or not it's a good idea to release it as a single stage, or perhaps do both.  I know some of you want the 6 stage version, and the money's pretty good for doing that, but half a year of slave labor isn't my idea of a good time...  so I'm working on a solution for everyone.

That is sad to hear. I have done 6 stages program and it is possibly the best subliminal experience that I have ever had. It gives you an additional level of progression feeling and it gives you the motivation to stick with the program for six months as you get something new each month...

Perhaps what you didn't like was to build it as users were running it. Thus it was giving the pressure the release the next stage on time.

Maybe simply putting aside this method of delivery will make the multi-stages program creation something enjoyable for you again...

What kills 6 stage sets for me in the latest gen tech is the fact that it is so difficult to build, so time consuming and so challenging to do while I am trying to build other things.  I really need to develop some software to help me process the scripts, at least.  It's advanced text manipulation.  I knew how to do that when I was programming, but since I have left programming, the whole game has changed and now even the best programming languages are going to require me to spend 2-3 months working to learn the language well enough to do it, and I just find it incredibly frustrating for the same reason I can't just hire someone to do it for me: I can't let anyone know how I do this.

But the build and scripting is only getting more and more complicated, so I guess it is better to work on that sooner than later.

If the process wasn't nightmare levels of complexity and months of daily tedium ad nauseum... I might not mind it so much.

 Shannon,
 how about BOTH programs... the short haul and the long haul. 6 stage sets are obviously the best most advanced way to go in several ways....of course,if available man. In this case UMsv2.
 How about this: Look at the possibility of creating a new fangled,advanced version  with all the new bells and whistle,kitchen sink in it, as single stage. an Upgrade: After all look at what an Upgrade, did for OF.
I mean OFv1 is still incredible,to this day, but OFv2 blew the lid off the thing ,entirely.

 So like UMSv2 single state with the very advanced,new and even more improved FRM 4.9, Plus Shields  Up Scotty = DRS, all in 5.75.6..... geez ...that's a quantum jump right there..... more than tiding us over til the newest 6 stage set came out of UMSv2..... that'd also give you and us more breathing room around the whole,thing, especially you,with the build process,etc Bubba.

Why does it have to be one or the other,why can it not be both.... thats my vibe on this.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - MegaMan - 02-23-2021

(02-22-2021, 09:26 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 08:04 AM)MegaMan Wrote: Currently, I am using MLS 3.0, could I switch over to MLS 4.0 and complete the cycle I started with MLS 3.0 with 4.0?
Am looking at Growing Taller after the MLS cycle and want to get it in this year.

When you say "cycle" what do you mean?  ASRB2 cycle?  You should finish whatever ASRB2 cycle you are engaged in, take the v3 # of days off, and then you can start V4 if you like.  But when you start v4, you are starting run-through #1, day 1, month 1.  You have to use it for at least one run-through, which is 4 months.

Thank you Shannon, I confused cycle and run-through. So I will take 1 day off (v3 # days off) and then start a 4 month run-through of MLS V4.
Just ordered MLS 4.0 *party*


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 02-23-2021

(02-23-2021, 05:34 AM)MegaMan Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 09:26 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 08:04 AM)MegaMan Wrote: Currently, I am using MLS 3.0, could I switch over to MLS 4.0 and complete the cycle I started with MLS 3.0 with 4.0?
Am looking at Growing Taller after the MLS cycle and want to get it in this year.

When you say "cycle" what do you mean?  ASRB2 cycle?  You should finish whatever ASRB2 cycle you are engaged in, take the v3 # of days off, and then you can start V4 if you like.  But when you start v4, you are starting run-through #1, day 1, month 1.  You have to use it for at least one run-through, which is 4 months.

Thank you Shannon, I confused cycle and run-through. So I will take 1 day off (v3 # days off) and then start a 4 month run-through of MLS V4.
Just ordered MLS 4.0 *party*

Excellent.  I appreciate your purchase!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Griffin - 02-23-2021

(02-23-2021, 02:43 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 08:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 08:22 PM)lano1106 Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 06:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-22-2021, 03:52 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I know Shannon will disagree but I just wanted to throw it out there.  Would it be a bad idea to also upgrade the UMS single stage we currently have and give people the option to buy an upgraded single stage but also the 6 stage set?

People (including Shannon) talking about the bad economic climate/sales etc.  What do businesses do in such situations? they adapt.

Instead of keeping things the way they are one must find ways to make the product more accessible.  Just my 2 cents.  I know i'm not the only one that wants an upgraded UMS but doesn't want to listen to a 6 stage/spend the 6 stage money at this point.

My personal preference is not to build another 5.75.xG multi-stage set.  Ever.  I have been weighing whether or not it's a good idea to release it as a single stage, or perhaps do both.  I know some of you want the 6 stage version, and the money's pretty good for doing that, but half a year of slave labor isn't my idea of a good time...  so I'm working on a solution for everyone.

That is sad to hear. I have done 6 stages program and it is possibly the best subliminal experience that I have ever had. It gives you an additional level of progression feeling and it gives you the motivation to stick with the program for six months as you get something new each month...

Perhaps what you didn't like was to build it as users were running it. Thus it was giving the pressure the release the next stage on time.

Maybe simply putting aside this method of delivery will make the multi-stages program creation something enjoyable for you again...

What kills 6 stage sets for me in the latest gen tech is the fact that it is so difficult to build, so time consuming and so challenging to do while I am trying to build other things.  I really need to develop some software to help me process the scripts, at least.  It's advanced text manipulation.  I knew how to do that when I was programming, but since I have left programming, the whole game has changed and now even the best programming languages are going to require me to spend 2-3 months working to learn the language well enough to do it, and I just find it incredibly frustrating for the same reason I can't just hire someone to do it for me: I can't let anyone know how I do this.

But the build and scripting is only getting more and more complicated, so I guess it is better to work on that sooner than later.

If the process wasn't nightmare levels of complexity and months of daily tedium ad nauseum... I might not mind it so much.

 Shannon,
 how about BOTH programs... the short haul and the long haul. 6 stage sets are obviously the best most advanced way to go in several ways....of course,if available man. In this case UMsv2.
 How about this: Look at the possibility of creating a new fangled,advanced version  with all the new bells and whistle,kitchen sink in it, as single stage. an Upgrade: After all  look at what an Upgrade, did for OF.
I mean OFv1 is still incredible,to this day, but OFv2 blew the lid off the thing ,entirely.

 So like UMSv2 single state with the very advanced,new and even more improved FRM 4.9, Plus Shields  Up Scotty = DRS, all in 5.75.6..... geez ...that's   a quantum jump right there..... more than tiding us over til the newest 6 stage set came out of UMSv2..... that'd also give you and us more breathing room around the whole,thing, especially you,with the build process,etc Bubba.

Why does it have to be one or the other,why can it not be both.... thats my vibe on this.

This might be good, I would love a 6 stage UMS, but it could also be in 6G later. 
This way you get more sales, we get UMS faster, and you get some breathing room to reevaluate.
maybe the models might give you an suggestion.

what ever your decision, I support itWink

Cheers


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Frosted - 02-23-2021

@Shannon Or you could just release UMS2 initially as a single stage (Stage 7), and then work on the 6 stage version when you have time.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Z-Man - 02-23-2021

Shannon are we getting closer for the technology for this sub?

A subliminal that can help you figure out your passion and pursue it. Believe it is possible and use the law of attraction to attain it?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - lano1106 - 02-23-2021

(02-22-2021, 08:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: What kills 6 stage sets for me in the latest gen tech is the fact that it is so difficult to build, so time consuming and so challenging to do while I am trying to build other things.  I really need to develop some software to help me process the scripts, at least.  It's advanced text manipulation.  I knew how to do that when I was programming, but since I have left programming, the whole game has changed and now even the best programming languages are going to require me to spend 2-3 months working to learn the language well enough to do it, and I just find it incredibly frustrating for the same reason I can't just hire someone to do it for me: I can't let anyone know how I do this.

But the build and scripting is only getting more and more complicated, so I guess it is better to work on that sooner than later.

If the process wasn't nightmare levels of complexity and months of daily tedium ad nauseum... I might not mind it so much.

I can relate to this dilemma. My trading system is a huge endeavor and I would certainly benefit from outsourcing some part of it to other programmers in order to achieve even more out of this journey.

The question is: How to make that happen without having my ideas copied and used for the profit of others?

I know that this is feasible. All the big and successful HFT hedge funds are doing it. I just haven't figured it out yet.

I guess one of the way to do it is to break down tasks in small ones so that the small piece alone doesn't do much and the creator cannot really understand how it fits in the bigger scheme...

I'm just way too busy right now but in few weeks since I'm a big fan of your work, if I could contribute to it with my programming knowledge, I would be happy to do it.

I could do some programming work for you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 02-23-2021

Shannon's words"
What kills 6 stage sets for me in the latest gen tech is the fact that it is so difficult to build, so time consuming and so challenging to do while I am trying to build other things.  I really need to develop some software to help me process the scripts, at least.  It's advanced text manipulation.  I knew how to do that when I was programming, but since I have left programming, the whole game has changed and now even the best programming languages are going to require me to spend 2-3 months working to learn the language well enough to do it, and I just find it incredibly frustrating for the same reason I can't just hire someone to do it for me: I can't let anyone know how I do this.

But the build and scripting is only getting more and more complicated, so I guess it is better to work on that sooner than later.

If the process wasn't nightmare levels of complexity and months of daily tedium ad nauseum... I might not mind it so much.



Me:
 Shannon,
 how about BOTH programs... the short haul and the long haul. 6 stage sets are obviously the best most advanced way to go in several ways....of course,if available man. In this case UMsv2.
 How about this: Look at the possibility of creating a new fangled,advanced version  with all the new bells and whistle,kitchen sink in it, as single stage. an Upgrade: After all look at what an Upgrade, did for OF.
I mean OFv1 is still incredible,to this day, but OFv2 blew the lid off the thing ,entirely.

 So like UMSv2 single state with the very advanced,new and even more improved FRM 4.9, Plus Shields  Up Scotty = DRS, all in 5.75.6..... geez ...that's a quantum jump right there..... more than tiding us over til the newest 6 stage set came out of UMSv2..... that'd also give you and us more breathing room around the whole,thing, especially you,with the build process,etc Bubba.

Why does it have to be one or the other,why can it not be both.... thats my vibe on this.


(02-23-2021, 12:26 PM)Frosted Wrote: @Shannon  Or you could just release UMS2 initially as a single stage (Stage 7), and then work on the 6 stage version when you have time.


 Frosted ,Man,thats best suggested addition I've seen on this...to me,...this si DING,ding!! Bonus round!! Stage 7 and then wait for the rest. F-en- A ,Man!! with the latest fear remover...it would be bang-ging!!