Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 01-28-2021

Is LTU Stage 6 meant to be run for 4 cycles (28 days) or 5 cycles (35 days)?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Raz - 01-28-2021

(01-28-2021, 09:06 AM)fab10 Wrote: Is LTU Stage 6 meant to be run for 4 cycles (28 days) or 5 cycles (35 days)?

With 5 days ON and 3 days OFF one cycle is 8 days, which means 4 cycles (32 days) for Stage 6.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - EvolvingPhoenix - 01-29-2021

(01-27-2021, 07:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 03:11 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 12:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI has languished for too long.  Maybe focusing on it a bit will help me find the solution.

At last!!! Fantastic news to hear. Working on it directly seems like it is likely to lead to some kind of solution. I assumed before that the new NSFM was made to test out something with an aura for an upcoming DMSI. I was surprised to learn they were independent of each other. Still, very encouraging to hear it's going to be worked on.

For now, I'm enjoying the excellent OF V2, have a little while left on it's run anyway. And things here are getting more and more ridiculous...on multiple fronts anyway. But it's still a huge relief to know it's being made, so it'll exist for when the time is right. I've been concerned about whether or not it'd be here in time, to be honest.

Great to hear, Shannon. UMS V2 sounds interesting too. UMS V1 didn't do much for me I think, but from 5.75.5G onward, the skeleton script seems to have turned a page for sure! Future seems bright.

Also: Where are the directions you're planning on taking the experience in making the wart sub? I assume physical-focused subs, growth subs etc.? That was intriguing to see.

Well what I had in mind has to remain a secret.  If this approach works for warts and moles, it has certain other potentials as well, which are rather important.  I'm not going to say anything more until I know that one or both of my ideas for this actually works, and I see a way of testing the other potentials the approach may have.


Fountain of Youth, I take it? Wink

That'll be sweet!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 01-29-2021

(01-29-2021, 12:22 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 07:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 03:11 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 12:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI has languished for too long.  Maybe focusing on it a bit will help me find the solution.

At last!!! Fantastic news to hear. Working on it directly seems like it is likely to lead to some kind of solution. I assumed before that the new NSFM was made to test out something with an aura for an upcoming DMSI. I was surprised to learn they were independent of each other. Still, very encouraging to hear it's going to be worked on.

For now, I'm enjoying the excellent OF V2, have a little while left on it's run anyway. And things here are getting more and more ridiculous...on multiple fronts anyway. But it's still a huge relief to know it's being made, so it'll exist for when the time is right. I've been concerned about whether or not it'd be here in time, to be honest.

Great to hear, Shannon. UMS V2 sounds interesting too. UMS V1 didn't do much for me I think, but from 5.75.5G onward, the skeleton script seems to have turned a page for sure! Future seems bright.

Also: Where are the directions you're planning on taking the experience in making the wart sub? I assume physical-focused subs, growth subs etc.? That was intriguing to see.

Well what I had in mind has to remain a secret.  If this approach works for warts and moles, it has certain other potentials as well, which are rather important.  I'm not going to say anything more until I know that one or both of my ideas for this actually works, and I see a way of testing the other potentials the approach may have.


Fountain of Youth, I take it? Wink

That'll be sweet!

 Fountain of Youth,you say?  and then some! wink!! and that amoung other things, down the road...some enormous possibilities exist here....


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - DMSIuser78 - 01-29-2021

@Shannon Do I need to run LTU6 stage 7 immediately after finishing stage 6, or can I run a different subliminal after I'm done with stage 6, then run stage 7 at a later date after I've finished running that subliminal?

I'm starting to have an urge to run OFv2.

kind of regret having bought OFv1 before I had a chance to do a run. Had I known there would be a v2, I would have waited.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 01-29-2021

(01-29-2021, 07:49 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote:
(01-29-2021, 12:22 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 07:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 03:11 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 12:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI has languished for too long.  Maybe focusing on it a bit will help me find the solution.

At last!!! Fantastic news to hear. Working on it directly seems like it is likely to lead to some kind of solution. I assumed before that the new NSFM was made to test out something with an aura for an upcoming DMSI. I was surprised to learn they were independent of each other. Still, very encouraging to hear it's going to be worked on.

For now, I'm enjoying the excellent OF V2, have a little while left on it's run anyway. And things here are getting more and more ridiculous...on multiple fronts anyway. But it's still a huge relief to know it's being made, so it'll exist for when the time is right. I've been concerned about whether or not it'd be here in time, to be honest.

Great to hear, Shannon. UMS V2 sounds interesting too. UMS V1 didn't do much for me I think, but from 5.75.5G onward, the skeleton script seems to have turned a page for sure! Future seems bright.

Also: Where are the directions you're planning on taking the experience in making the wart sub? I assume physical-focused subs, growth subs etc.? That was intriguing to see.

Well what I had in mind has to remain a secret.  If this approach works for warts and moles, it has certain other potentials as well, which are rather important.  I'm not going to say anything more until I know that one or both of my ideas for this actually works, and I see a way of testing the other potentials the approach may have.


Fountain of Youth, I take it? Wink

That'll be sweet!

 Fountain of Youth,you say?  and then some! wink!! and that amoung other things, down the road...some enormous possibilities exist here....

The fountain of youth was not what I had in mind, unfortunately.  But who knows what could come of it if it works.  There is one specific goal I have in mind, though, and if either of these approaches works with warts and moles, it should theoretically work for this other potential.  And if it does, it would blow my mind.  I've had this idea in my mind for over a year, brewing and stewing as I contemplated it and how to make it work.  I think I have it to the point that at least one of the approaches I have come up with should work.  And from there, we shall see.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 01-29-2021

(01-29-2021, 10:05 AM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: @Shannon Do I need to run LTU6 stage 7 immediately after finishing stage 6, or can I run a different subliminal after I'm done with stage 6, then run stage 7 at a later date after I've finished running that subliminal?

I'm starting to have an urge to run OFv2.

kind of regret having bought OFv1 before I had a chance to do a run. Had I known there would be a v2, I would have waited.

I strongly recommend running Stage 7 after stage 6.  Normally, you'd be free to do as you please, but because of the unique situation with LTUv6 being built during a period of huge change and improvement of the technologies, you're going to want to run Stage 7 because it will not just give you all of the script for all of the stages, it will bring them all up to 5.75.5G.  It will definitely be worth running Stage 7.

I was not expecting to do a v2 of OF for a long time.  It just happened to be a series of rapid breakthroughs back to back and the right circumstances that resulted in it.  v1 is still a worthy run.  Don't feel like you need to upgrade just because there's an upgrade there, especially if you can't easily afford it.  V2 is better, but v1 is still a great sub and I loved running it.  It's rare that I find a sub that I genuinely love running.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 01-29-2021

"but v1 is still a great sub and I loved running it. It's rare that I find a sub that I genuinely love running. "- Shannon's quote

Yeah,well, I was impressed with how much you loved UMS v1...so I know that when the time comes UMS v2. is gonna be even more of an impressive program. DarthZenith's recent post on overcoming fears...full on blew my socks off. man of man what a program and thusly experience(s). whew. 2021 is gonna be bangin' !!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 01-29-2021

(01-29-2021, 10:20 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: "but v1 is still a great sub and I loved running it.  It's rare that I find a sub that I genuinely love running. "- Shannon's quote

Yeah,well,  I was impressed with how much you loved UMS v1...so I know that when the time comes UMS v2. is gonna be even more of an impressive  program. DarthZenith's recent post on overcoming fears...full on blew my socks off. man of man what a program and thusly experience(s). whew. 2021 is gonna be bangin' !!

Unless I missed something important, 2021 should be a very good year with regards to what I am able to accomplish, because it looks like the shackles will finally be coming off.  For the most part.  We still have the longest cycle of all sitting right on a "screw you" spot for me, but that's probably just going to make the haters come out and try to hate more.  There seems to be a core of people who hates me personally, and they want to see me and IML go down for various reasons that speak more to their maturity level than anything else.  Those people will probably be more active this year.  It will be trying at times, and it will be annoying, but I will prevail.  So anyone who reads this... if you see anyone trash talking me or IML... just remember to consider the source.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Rusty - 01-29-2021

Will future ASC 6 contain FRM in the program?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 01-29-2021

(01-29-2021, 11:50 AM)Rusty Wrote: Will future ASC 6 contain FRM in the program?

ASC 6G will indeed contain FRM.  Unless I come up with something better.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Omni3 - 01-29-2021

(01-29-2021, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-29-2021, 10:20 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: "but v1 is still a great sub and I loved running it.  It's rare that I find a sub that I genuinely love running. "- Shannon's quote

Yeah,well,  I was impressed with how much you loved UMS v1...so I know that when the time comes UMS v2. is gonna be even more of an impressive  program. DarthZenith's recent post on overcoming fears...full on blew my socks off. man of man what a program and thusly experience(s). whew. 2021 is gonna be bangin' !!

Unless I missed something important, 2021 should be a very good year with regards to what I am able to accomplish, because it looks like the shackles will finally be coming off.  For the most part.  We still have the longest cycle of all sitting right on a "screw you" spot for me, but that's probably just going to make the haters come out and try to hate more.  There seems to be a core of people who hates me personally, and they want to see me and IML go down for various reasons that speak more to their maturity level than anything else.  Those people will probably be more active this year.  It will be trying at times, and it will be annoying, but I will prevail.  So anyone who reads this... if you see anyone trash talking me or IML... just remember to consider the source.

We're with you all the way @Shannon. Onwards and upwards.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 01-29-2021

(01-29-2021, 12:34 PM)Omni3 Wrote:
(01-29-2021, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-29-2021, 10:20 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: "but v1 is still a great sub and I loved running it.  It's rare that I find a sub that I genuinely love running. "- Shannon's quote

Yeah,well,  I was impressed with how much you loved UMS v1...so I know that when the time comes UMS v2. is gonna be even more of an impressive  program. DarthZenith's recent post on overcoming fears...full on blew my socks off. man of man what a program and thusly experience(s). whew. 2021 is gonna be bangin' !!

Unless I missed something important, 2021 should be a very good year with regards to what I am able to accomplish, because it looks like the shackles will finally be coming off.  For the most part.  We still have the longest cycle of all sitting right on a "screw you" spot for me, but that's probably just going to make the haters come out and try to hate more.  There seems to be a core of people who hates me personally, and they want to see me and IML go down for various reasons that speak more to their maturity level than anything else.  Those people will probably be more active this year.  It will be trying at times, and it will be annoying, but I will prevail.  So anyone who reads this... if you see anyone trash talking me or IML... just remember to consider the source.

We're with you all the way @Shannon. Onwards and upwards.

Much appreciated.  Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 01-29-2021

Shannon's quote from his private journal;

"Much to my surprise, for a period of time today I found a job I actually could do. I transplanted the key script from MLS 5.5G to the latest skeleton script, and then went through it and marked it up, flagging the potential points of resistance for either adjustment or removal. Now I remember why I got so upset that it didn't work. It's pretty incredible what this thing is actually designed to do. I was impressed, reading through it, having forgotten most of what I actually put in it, and that's coming from the "now" me, more than a year later. I have learned and grown in skill and understanding a lot since this was built, but this script still impresses me. It really failed primarily because of the lack of a good FRM at the time.

So MLS is definitely going to benefit from having the points of resistance removed, on top of the new skeleton script, the Platinum Lake build and whatever I decide to add, if anything. I don't really think there's much that could be added to this to make it better than it already is, given that we remove the major points of resistance and support it properly with FRM and so forth. Hopefully when this comes out, you all will see what I had originally intended for it to do and accomplish. "


Me:
Cleary this Fear Remover is really changing things and opening up many pathways to new and even more dynamic programs Shannon.. Wow.