Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Paul1131 - 11-13-2019

(11-13-2019, 07:44 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:
(11-12-2019, 03:53 PM)Paul1131 Wrote:
(11-12-2019, 02:44 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: You're right, Shannon. It seems I need to love myself enough to treat myself better, as has been the case in the past. I'm afraid to do what you suggest though. Maybe because I'm worried that if I let go of whatever umhealthy beleifs or programming I'm holding onto, I'll stop playing shitty stupid games and will therefor "lose" them. Or something. I'm not sure. I don't know. I have some DEEP insecurities programmed by years of negative experiences sending the message "You're inadequate, and this is why X, Y and Z" and so I don't want to let go of that programming because then I worry that I'll never be able to prove that statement wrong by accomplishing X Y and Z because I'll no longer pursue X Y amd Z. But all of that is based on the premise of "You're inadequate" and so long as that premise fuels it all, X Y and Z is out of reach anyway. I dunno. It's hard to explain. Thank you for reminding me that I deserve better treatment though. I'll just carpetbomb then bloom 7 days on and off like I've BEEN doing then, because I don't know what other regimen (or whatever you call it) works better. Thank you for your honest feedback. It really gave me some much needed perspective. Thank you.


Hey EP.  The tone and content of this post shows improvement already.  It almost sounds like a different person talking even since last week.  I can sense a new confidence.  Good job.
Thanks Paul. Although I'm not feeling very confident...


The first sub I ever used when I discovered them was a Brand X confidence program.  It didn’t work really fast, but other people noticed long before I did.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - EvolvingPhoenix - 11-13-2019

Cool. I'm glad to be hearing that. Gives me hope!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Griffin - 11-15-2019

Hey Shannon, I find that I spend too much time on the forum and might want to cut back on this.
I know I have to do this cold turkey and stop going on the site period.
but I would still like to know when new products come out.
Do you guys have like newsletter type thing where I can get an email whenever there is an new sub out?
Cheers


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-16-2019

(11-13-2019, 01:13 PM)THolt Wrote: Yeah
(11-13-2019, 12:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2019, 11:56 AM)Griffin Wrote:
(11-13-2019, 09:11 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2019, 07:46 AM)THolt Wrote: I’m looking forward to the new one.  

UMS has worked wonders for me but in a very subtle way. It has made me aware of how important investing regularly is.

When the time comes, I'll look at what you guys have come up with on the UMS2 ideas thread and add any ideas that are possible to add, and genuinely add value to the program.  For the time being I really don't see that it needs more features, like I said.  I think it just needs to get past resistance better and faster.

It's a pretty nice program.  I love it.

Shannon, just an idea, as it might make you some money and please costumers!
what about skipping adding any adding of ideas, or maybe just one or Two that really benefits the program and then just upgrade the skeleton script and FRM, etc. This might save you heaps of time, and when FRM 4.9 is out, it might have enough impact to break people's resistance more.
When people are executing better its also easier to see what is missing and what too add in the future and release an UMS3.

That's pretty much what I had in mind to do originally.  I really don't think it needs a lot of new features.

Is this the case with USLM 4.2 as well? Just a new FRM and skeleton script

I found some things I can add to USLM, but they're not going to be the main thrust for 4.2 if they make it in.  The main thrust is going to be achieving better execution.  Which is why I was doing the research that led to me finding those things...

The new skeleton script and a new FRM are a lot bigger deal for achieving that than you might realize.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-16-2019

(11-15-2019, 10:44 PM)Griffin Wrote: Hey Shannon, I find that I spend too much time on the forum and might want to cut back on this.
I know I have to do this cold turkey and stop going on the site period.
but I would still like to know when new products come out.
Do you guys have like newsletter type thing where I can get an email whenever there is an new sub out?
Cheers

We try to send out an e-mail when we release new products, but because we try not to spam people, we limit our e-mails to about once a month maximum right now.  So if you want to avoid the forum, but still know when things are coming out, join our newsletter.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 11-16-2019

(11-16-2019, 01:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2019, 01:13 PM)THolt Wrote: Yeah
(11-13-2019, 12:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2019, 11:56 AM)Griffin Wrote:
(11-13-2019, 09:11 AM)Shannon Wrote: When the time comes, I'll look at what you guys have come up with on the UMS2 ideas thread and add any ideas that are possible to add, and genuinely add value to the program.  For the time being I really don't see that it needs more features, like I said.  I think it just needs to get past resistance better and faster.

It's a pretty nice program.  I love it.

Shannon, just an idea, as it might make you some money and please costumers!
what about skipping adding any adding of ideas, or maybe just one or Two that really benefits the program and then just upgrade the skeleton script and FRM, etc. This might save you heaps of time, and when FRM 4.9 is out, it might have enough impact to break people's resistance more.
When people are executing better its also easier to see what is missing and what too add in the future and release an UMS3.

That's pretty much what I had in mind to do originally.  I really don't think it needs a lot of new features.

Is this the case with USLM 4.2 as well? Just a new FRM and skeleton script

I found some things I can add to USLM, but they're not going to be the main thrust for 4.2 if they make it in.  The main thrust is going to be achieving better execution.  Which is why I was doing the research that led to me finding those things...

The new skeleton script and a new FRM are a lot bigger deal for achieving that than you might realize.

Ah ok. I’m eagerly looking forward to it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Theron - 11-16-2019

@Shannon
Need your suggestion.
After testing for a couple of weeks, I have settled at 8 Loops with 5 days break on US of UMS. This has given me a constant and steady increase in my customers. I don't have any tiredness using this combo
When I try 8 loops with Hybrid trickling stream,  it makes me super tired at least for two days.  and I see bigger orders ( one-off and not steady) coming in my business.

Which would be a better option to do?
Reduce to 7 loops and do Hybrid or continue with US or Hybrid on 8 loops? or push for more loops?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-16-2019

(11-16-2019, 07:15 PM)Theron Wrote: @Shannon
Need your suggestion.
After testing for a couple of weeks, I have settled at 8 Loops with 5 days break on US of UMS. This has given me a constant and steady increase in my customers. I don't have any tiredness using this combo
When I try 8 loops with Hybrid trickling stream,  it makes me super tired at least for two days.  and I see bigger orders ( one-off and not steady) coming in my business.

Which would be a better option to do?
Reduce to 7 loops and do Hybrid or continue with US or Hybrid on 8 loops? or push for more loops?

Hybrid gives you better results because it is doubling the input per unit of time.  That is also why it makes you tired.  However, as we have seen many times, what initially makes you tired, you will acclimate to in time.  So just switch to the hybrid and keep the 8 loops on one day and then 5 days off.  You will acclimate, and get the benefits.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Theron - 11-16-2019

double post


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Theron - 11-16-2019

(11-16-2019, 07:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-16-2019, 07:15 PM)Theron Wrote: @Shannon
Need your suggestion.
After testing for a couple of weeks, I have settled at 8 Loops with 5 days break on US of UMS. This has given me a constant and steady increase in my customers. I don't have any tiredness using this combo
When I try 8 loops with Hybrid trickling stream,  it makes me super tired at least for two days.  and I see bigger orders ( one-off and not steady) coming in my business.

Which would be a better option to do?
Reduce to 7 loops and do Hybrid or continue with US or Hybrid on 8 loops? or push for more loops?

Hybrid gives you better results because it is doubling the input per unit of time.  That is also why it makes you tired.  However, as we have seen many times, what initially makes you tired, you will acclimate to in time.  So just switch to the hybrid and keep the 8 loops on one day and then 5 days off.  You will acclimate, and get the benefits.


Thanks for the suggestion, will do...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - EvolvingPhoenix - 11-17-2019

(11-16-2019, 07:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-16-2019, 07:15 PM)Theron Wrote: @Shannon 
Need your suggestion.
After testing for a couple of weeks, I have settled at 8 Loops with 5 days break on US of UMS. This has given me a constant and steady increase in my customers. I don't have any tiredness using this combo
When I try 8 loops with Hybrid trickling stream,  it makes me super tired at least for two days.  and I see bigger orders ( one-off and not steady) coming in my business.

Which would be a better option to do?
Reduce to 7 loops and do Hybrid or continue with US or Hybrid on 8 loops? or push for more loops?

Hybrid gives you better results because it is doubling the input per unit of time.  That is also why it makes you tired.  However, as we have seen many times, what initially makes you tired, you will acclimate to in time.  So just switch to the hybrid and keep the 8 loops on one day and then 5 days off.  You will acclimate, and get the benefits.


Really? Hybrid's the strongest? How do I use the hybrid one? Never quite understood how to use the hybrids, so I just avoid them and use ultrasonics.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Raz - 11-17-2019

(11-17-2019, 06:27 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: Really? Hybrid's the strongest? How do I use the hybrid one? Never quite understood how to use the hybrids, so I just avoid them and use ultrasonics.

Load. Play. Done.

Prime example of why there is a FAQ section. Here is what it says in regard to the hybrid format.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Paul1131 - 11-17-2019

(11-17-2019, 06:27 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:
(11-16-2019, 07:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-16-2019, 07:15 PM)Theron Wrote: @Shannon 
Need your suggestion.
After testing for a couple of weeks, I have settled at 8 Loops with 5 days break on US of UMS. This has given me a constant and steady increase in my customers. I don't have any tiredness using this combo
When I try 8 loops with Hybrid trickling stream,  it makes me super tired at least for two days.  and I see bigger orders ( one-off and not steady) coming in my business.

Which would be a better option to do?
Reduce to 7 loops and do Hybrid or continue with US or Hybrid on 8 loops? or push for more loops?

Hybrid gives you better results because it is doubling the input per unit of time.  That is also why it makes you tired.  However, as we have seen many times, what initially makes you tired, you will acclimate to in time.  So just switch to the hybrid and keep the 8 loops on one day and then 5 days off.  You will acclimate, and get the benefits.


Really? Hybrid's the strongest? How do I use the hybrid one? Never quite understood how to use the hybrids, so I just avoid them and use ultrasonics.

You just listen to it, same as the other formats.  That may be part of your issue there, from what I can remember some people are a lot more responsive to the audible portion than they are to the ultrasonic.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - EvolvingPhoenix - 11-17-2019

Do I listen to it on headphones or speakers, is what I meant. But now that I read the FAQ, I understand. Thanks Raz!