![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-02-2020 (11-01-2020, 08:19 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon's quote": "In fact I have concluded that I cannot build UMS v2 as a multi-stage set because LTUv6 is taking so much time and work " - The issue is, I cannot spend 2-3 months building one program and keep things going well right now. We have to deal with some serious limitations on the back end that are really forcing my hand on a few things. Every month, I must build at least one program that is something that will bring in income. Unfortunately, building a six stage set in such an advanced technology level is very time consuming. My plan was to build 1 stage and 1+ money makers per month. But of course we know how plans go, right? October I spent most of the month either unable to work, or working at the pace of a snail (thanks to MIRv3 allowing me to work while I am sick, which would not have been the case otherwise), and having to build and release a program I promised to give away for free upgrade. I am in the position of being forced to work on programs that don't make much money (SLM 4.2, DMSI) because I do what I say I will do, and then the unexpected stuff is killing my ability to stay on track. You bring up excellent points, and reminded me why I was going to do a 6 stage set on UMS v2 in the first place. But... next time, if I do a 6 stage set, I am not going to release it until all of the stages are finished. That was a big mistake on my part, because of all the unexpected stuff. Tomorrow I'm going to start working on Stage 4, but after that I have to start working on something to make money again. Then I can work on Stage 5+. The issue is that I am trying to do too many things at once, please too many people at once and stay on top of everything that is going wrong or dragging me down. So as I said, you make a very good point and remind me why I was going to do UMS v2 in a 6 stage set, but if I do build it as a 6 stage set, I have to build all of it before I release it, and that will take 2-3 months at least, given that I also have to build and work on other stuff at the same time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-02-2020 (11-01-2020, 11:20 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hey there, @Shannon. I was contemplating building what I could do now and leaving that for 3.4, but I think you're right. It would be better to do that in 3.3.3, regardless of how long it takes, because it may take more than one try to get it right, and we are only doing 2 more free upgrades. Quote:2. I was pleasantly surprised to see you talk about PE!!!! I was using it before I switched to OF 5.75G, again figuring it'd be perfect to do during this unique down time. Is there any chance of a creation of PE 5.75.3+G soon during this downtime? It'd be an incredibly easy sale for you to get some cash off it, no doubt. I wish I got more out of IYPS 4G than I did. A new version would be awesome to use during this to prepare for life after, depending on how long it drags on for. That would be an insta-buy. Just thinking of a win-win here, Shannon. Plus some experience with growing dense tissue, could be useful going forward as that requires quite a bit of power and I'm sure the tech and skeleton script would see large benefits. I can build PE 5.75.xG now, or I can wait until I finish doing the R&D to know how to do it right. I'm sure you'll understand why I haven't built it already. But it's coming. I just have to find the right phraseology and scripting for certain parts. Quote:3. For the FRM for the affected, have you considered using the Magnus Engine, to channel FRM in an accelerated form, specifically tailored to their fears of approaching men and sexual initiation? I don't know if you're merely doing it through an aura, so I wanted to suggest this idea. Because from what I see of the Magnus Engine, it acts like an accelerator for scripting. If the scripting for this is tight enough, it could quickly bust through the resistance required for the affected to create momentum for action. Just a thought. I appreciate the idea. The Magnus Engine doesn't work quite the way I would need it to for this to work in the manner you're thinking, though. I need to basically get the user to execute FRM, and at the same time, get someone else to execute it just by being influenced by the user's aura... which is, as you might imagine, an order of magnitude more difficult than getting the user to execute it. It would be unthinkable, if I did not have the script of FRM 4.9 finished. I know I can do this, but it is on a level of complexity that is just crazy. If I have enough time to contemplate it, I will find the solutions I need to make it happen, but it may require more than one try. You stay safe as well, my friend. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-02-2020 (11-02-2020, 08:22 AM)LionKing Wrote: The thing that gets me with PE is that I think it should be combined with OED. Just train the soldier to stand up strong and stay at attention for as long as needed, deal with any GSF that's preventing this. Having just either one function seems lacking, and increasing both a bit would seem to directly add on top of each other. Maybe one deals with the other as well, but how to know which one to spend 8 months on? Running both is too much time invested into this one area, since there's other programs like LTU to run also. Not everyone has ED. Not everyone wants or needs to use OED. The solution is to create PE, OED and a combination of the two. Or just keep them as separate goals. We will figure that out when the time comes. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-02-2020 (11-02-2020, 10:12 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote:(11-01-2020, 08:19 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon's quote": "In fact I have concluded that I cannot build UMS v2 as a multi-stage set because LTUv6 is taking so much time and work " - We just need to let me finish dealing with everything else that needs to be built first and then I will find a solution. Given your reminder that I was going to build it as a 6 stage set for a good reason, it seems most likely that that will be what I do - 6 stage set - but this time, I don't want to build it piecemeal, I want it finished before I offer it for sale. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-02-2020 (11-02-2020, 01:23 PM)samba99 Wrote: UMS instruction changed? I adjusted the instructions for UMS because I concluded that this would be easier for people to understand, and they would likely get similar results from starting off there instead of working their way to it using the previous instructions. The whole UMS thing was basically I was abandoning the idea of UMS v2 as a six stage set and making it as a single stage only. But now I remember why I was going to build it as a six stage set, so it;s likely to be a six stage set at this point. I just cannot allow myself to release it until it's finished this time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - lano1106 - 11-02-2020 (11-02-2020, 08:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-02-2020, 08:22 AM)LionKing Wrote: The thing that gets me with PE is that I think it should be combined with OED. Just train the soldier to stand up strong and stay at attention for as long as needed, deal with any GSF that's preventing this. Having just either one function seems lacking, and increasing both a bit would seem to directly add on top of each other. Maybe one deals with the other as well, but how to know which one to spend 8 months on? Running both is too much time invested into this one area, since there's other programs like LTU to run also. I think that the assumption used by LionKing behind his suggestion is that the OED program might contain suggestions improving erection quality that would be beneficial to all IYPS users even those who don't suffer from ED. At least, this is how I have interpreted his idea... (or that is what I had in mind when I saw his post) I have good erection but not like the painfully good ones that I might had in my teenage years. Scientific studies appear to demonstrate that prolonged 110% level erection have the capacity to increase size... Or there is definitely a common core that could be shared between the 2 programs... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Lowe - 11-03-2020 Dear Shannon, You made a prediction earlier (somewhere on this forum) about the coronavirus and I recall you believed there would be 3 waves and that the second wave will be the worst, which seems to be correct now. So what do your models say about how the situation will be like in 2021/2022? I am curious. Thanks. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - LionKing - 11-03-2020 (11-02-2020, 08:25 PM)lano1106 Wrote:(11-02-2020, 08:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-02-2020, 08:22 AM)LionKing Wrote: The thing that gets me with PE is that I think it should be combined with OED. Just train the soldier to stand up strong and stay at attention for as long as needed, deal with any GSF that's preventing this. Having just either one function seems lacking, and increasing both a bit would seem to directly add on top of each other. Maybe one deals with the other as well, but how to know which one to spend 8 months on? Running both is too much time invested into this one area, since there's other programs like LTU to run also. Ahem.... uh, actually it was just me completely misunderstanding what was talked about. I thought it was OPE, as in lasting longer without holding back, and OED, as in max blood flow and zero hesitation, with reduced comeback time. Subliminal Viagra, Penile Mastery. EDIT: PEnlargement and OED, yes I think the former could benefit from increased blood flow, and especially if that PE actuay succeeds, then you're gonna need more blood flow. OED being caused by something else, then yeah maybe not related. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 11-03-2020 Shannon's response on the building of UMS v2 down the road: "We just need to let me finish dealing with everything else that needs to be built first and then I will find a solution. Given your reminder that I was going to build it as a 6 stage set for a good reason, it seems most likely that that will be what I do - 6 stage set - but this time, I don't want to build it piecemeal, I want it finished before I offer it for sale." My Response: First of all thank you! Thank you!! Secondly) Just the Fact that UMV is going to be 're-built' at all, is fantastic right there!! Thrirdly!) IM relieved and that very much so,that you've reconsidered The Building of UMS v2!!( Raises Cowboy Hat,wipes sweat from brow,with brown leather work gloves,after shoeing horses! - relieved) and I personally,wouldnt want you to release it piecemeal ,either Man. I'd love the whole set at once,once released. its in place and can just start the next cycle,as its time to do so,right there. so yeah I whole heartedly agree with you,about this and dont 'fault cha'!! Fourthly) Even if its rebuilt or begun being scripted(new script)-& re-scripted( Old script adjustments,ect) re-building it and then built,in January,February, or March of 2021...then it will be ,at least that it is to come,though, and not scrapped all together!! SO Thank you for that,Man! I've got a LOT of pressure on me, too. I do understand,your need to balance,making money with other sub's to be released between now and 'then' as well the need to finish what you've begun( LTU6,DMSI,ect) I get it Man. give yourself the space you need to do so,space to breath fully as such. Thank you for re-considering UMS v2 ,Shannon,in 6 stages + 1 . Quick Wink! Truly,appreciated. I slept better last night,when I read all the response's concerning this title. Whew!! "Ppreciate! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 11-04-2020 (11-03-2020, 05:08 AM)Lowe Wrote: Dear Shannon, The models, in the last month, have been affected by some sort of variable that is creating a lot of instability and I have had to spend a LOT more time to get answers. The answers I am getting recently are also much less stable than usual, meaning that there are currently many possibilities and probabilities converging with almost equal likelihood of coming to pass, which makes it necessary for me to revise forecasts much more frequently. This is not unexpected, but it is annoying. I just have to wait for the disruptive influence to end. That said, I have not modeled the situation with the virus in a long time because of that. But my best estimate - and take this with a large grain of salt, because it's just an educated guess - is that we will see the majority of issues concerning the second wave fade out between March and October of 2021, most likely March and June 2021. I don't know if a third wave is still likely. 2021 is definitely going to be interesting to behold. So is 2022. Looks like some history is going to be made during those years. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - K-Train - 11-04-2020 (11-01-2020, 08:40 AM)Shannon Wrote: As for it not being life changing, there are several situations in which it can be and will be life changing. I will explain. Holy crap, if this thing works then it's honestly going into my library immediately. Jeez dude I wish this thing had been around when I was still in undergrad. Ok Shannon so once again you've got me on the edge of taking out my credit card BUT...I got questions: 1.) I'm currently able to give my GF multiple orgasms now with each one being at a different intensity based on positioning, emotional state, stimulation etc. So with OE each of those orgasms should (in theory, assuming proper usage) be maxed out at a 10 out of 10? 2.) I remember way back in the day you talked about how sex with your perfect lover caused orgasms that produced out of body experiences. Are those types of effects likely with spontaneous use or is this something we'd see after weeks or months of use? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - apollolux - 11-04-2020 (11-04-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:(11-03-2020, 05:08 AM)Lowe Wrote: Dear Shannon, Might that variable be related to the 2020 US election cycle and potential government policies? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Mystic Pymp - 11-04-2020 (11-04-2020, 12:54 PM)apollolux Wrote:(11-04-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:(11-03-2020, 05:08 AM)Lowe Wrote: Dear Shannon, 4chan's chaos magic? Seriously though it depends if we're talking US or worldwide - I don't think US elections would make huge difference for other continents (I assume Canada and Mexico bordering US will have effect for them). There are other factors though, virus mutations and new strands might as an example. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 11-04-2020 Quote:it depends if we're talking US or worldwide - I don't think US elections would make huge difference for other continents (I assume Canada and Mexico bordering US will have effect for them). There are other factors though, virus mutations and new strands might as an example.Nato, WHO, Paris accord, Iran, general approach to the E.U., the U.N. even... I am sure that the European continent is watching very closely. Then there’s the economy- U.S. economy heavily affects world economy. I’ll stop before it gets tagged as politics. I agree with apollolux that the destabilizing variable must be the U.S. elections, which will heavily reflect on the way Covid is handled. |