Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 08-10-2020 (08-10-2020, 03:48 PM)Determined Wrote: Don’t know about you guys, but waiting for LTU6 for me feels like waiting for Christmas! Same here, but I will wait until tomorrow to “open the package” because I feel I can use one more day of rest. Also, the 11th is an auspicious day for me, a perfect day to start this important journey. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 08-10-2020 (08-10-2020, 06:58 PM)Benjamin Wrote: If there's any issues with downloads then let me know. Someone sent me a pm saying they brought Stage 1 but I can't reply cos they disabled, so if you guys want a reply from me then don't disable your pm's. I can reenable it if I go into the options but I shouldn't have to do that. I just downloaded a file: 307.8 Mb for silent, looks good. Now if only I could find a way to include the same track seven times in a playlist instead of wasting 2 Gb of precious phone memory by duplicating the file seven times. Edit: I found a way! The latest version of VLC for iOS now allows that RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Jakeb203 - 08-10-2020 Hi Shannon, I’ve sent a message to you recently on Skype with regard to a customized sub, please let me know whenever you have time. Best, Jakeb203 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Determined - 08-11-2020 *Edit RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Hanpan - 08-11-2020 (07-24-2020, 05:39 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-24-2020, 05:20 PM)fab10 Wrote:(07-24-2020, 09:00 AM)Hanpan Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:57 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:32 PM)NOMAD Wrote: I use earbuds on an Android phone and set the volume of 10-11/15 (whatever is most comfortable.) Maybe try starting at that level. Apologize if this has been my question below has been clarified in another thread, but I couldn't find it anywhere. Is one format stronger/more effective than another? As far as I understand from the post below, you can use: a) Ultrasonic or hybrid on 13/15 on your phone speaker. I guess this also depends on how far the speaker is away from your head, or: b) Masked on (medium volume) with earbuds/headphones. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 08-11-2020 (08-11-2020, 12:09 PM)Hanpan Wrote:(07-24-2020, 05:39 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-24-2020, 05:20 PM)fab10 Wrote:(07-24-2020, 09:00 AM)Hanpan Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: Hybrid includes ultrasonic. That is not a wise thing to do on earbuds. Especially on earbuds. The volume from the speaker does not equate. it is much higher, relatively, through earbuds. It can potentially also damage your hearing to listen to ultrasonic that loud through earbuds. The formats are different because they use different methods and volumes to achieve the goal of communivcating the subliminalized script. "Better" and "stronger" are not applicable because it depends on the person. Some people respond better to masked format; some to ultrasonic, and some to hybrid. What is "better" depends on what works better for you. "Stronger" is also relative because A) stronger isn't always better, and B) really there is no difference in "strength" between any of the formats, since "strength" relies on the script, which is the same for each format. That said, masked uses volume differencing to present the script subliminally, and low volume specifically. This results in a gentler approach which communicates to deeper levels of the subconscious. If you happen to have a certain personality type, this will be much "better" because it is most effective. But for some other personality types, it is not motivating enough to be as effective as one of the other formats would be. For ultrasonic format, it is more motivating, but may be interpreted as "being told what to do". In that case, it will tend to trigger resistance from some personality types, while others are more motivated and get better results from it. Hybrid format is both of the other two formats at once. This is as much input as you can get at once, and therefore theoretically the "strongest" approach possible, but again, for some people it's too much, too aggressive, etc. and for others it's very effective. It depends on what works best for your personality type and your specific usage requirements. I have recently concluded that it is useless for me to try to get specific with volumes, because different phones have different volumes t the same "volume level", and because they also have differences in where the speaker is relative to the microphone, there is no way for me to be specific and have it make sense for someone else. So my advice now must return to what it was to begin with, which is to calibrate volume using an audible track, make it comfortable, and make sure that you can both hear the lowest levels of the ocean surf and the highest levels are not too loud. That should be the right volume for all the tracks, and if you find that is too loud with the ultrasonic track, lower it some. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - KingDavid93 - 08-11-2020 Hi @Shannon Other than E4 what else is going to be extracted from LTU6? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 08-11-2020 (08-11-2020, 12:09 PM)Hanpan Wrote:(07-24-2020, 05:39 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-24-2020, 05:20 PM)fab10 Wrote:(07-24-2020, 09:00 AM)Hanpan Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: Hybrid includes ultrasonic. That is not a wise thing to do on earbuds. Especially on earbuds. The volume from the speaker does not equate. it is much higher, relatively, through earbuds. It can potentially also damage your hearing to listen to ultrasonic that loud through earbuds. One factor you might also want to consider is that ultrasonic is more flexible and easier to use, it’s much easier to talk on the phone and watch TV with ultrasonic for example. And you do not have to explain to anyone why on earth you are listening to trickling water. For me personally it’s also the best format to use at night, it does not bother my sleep, unlike the audible formats. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 08-11-2020 (08-11-2020, 12:51 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: Hi @Shannon USLM 4.2, possibly UMOP, and there are other possibilities. I will know more when I am ready to look closer at it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - KingDavid93 - 08-11-2020 @Shannon Would these extractions from LTU 6 be occurring prior to DMSI or after DMSI and before UMS V2? Also any idea as to where in your queue lies programs for weight loss and hair regrowth (for bald people and/or people with balding, thinning hair) And as a side note do you think that it is possible to regrow all of your hair with a subliminal for those that are afflicted with male pattern baldness? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 08-11-2020 (08-11-2020, 04:28 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: @Shannon The extractions will happen alongside DMSI. I expect them to each require a relatively short period of time to complete, since I just need to de-tag everything that isn't the relevant script, adjust the Platinum Lake settings and re-build. My plan is to work on DMSI until I need a break from it, then work on one of the extractions for a day or two, then repeat. Weight Loss v7 (which will not be officially named that, most likely) has actually been in the works for almost two years now. It's a very long, complex list of goals at this point, and I have been slowly developing and testing various key goals. The issue I have with building it is: A) I want to build it in 6G, which isn't finished yet, and B) some of the goals are not yet finished being developed to a suitably effective working state yet. It will be a focus sometime after 6G is finished, but I don't know exactly when. I do know that I'm impatient to see this program finished, because several of the ideas and goals going into it will make this a killer program, provided I can find a way to make them work well enough to accomplish their goals. Hair regrowth is not really on my radar right now. I'll eventually be doing that in 6G, but for the time being I don't have time to think about it, plan it, research it or develop it. As for what is possible, I will say this. All things are possible - as long as you know how to achieve them. The key is going to be finding that "how". RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 08-12-2020 part of Shannon's comments from "Frosted"s journal that I just read: " The ease and smoothness is indicative of more power, more success, more acceptance, more execution. Should be an interesting journey!" Me: I could SEE UMS2 having this same kinda vibe and flow...after all why not,right?....with ALL the new technology and such, Da Platinum Lake,new script build - and ,goodness knows what ever else..... as much as you Love UMS1 Shannon, I could see this being the real deal with UMS2, too,and perhaps something or somethings,new to add into UMS2 by that time. Im loving the effects and the impact LTU6 is haviing already on the Men here...remarkable,already. damn,Outstanding in fact. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Wiseg9999 - 08-12-2020 Shannon, how do i know if OF 5.75 is loud enough on US format? I am listening through powered speakers and i am sleeping 2 to 3 meters away. I calibrated with the hybrid and it is quite loud, like a loud TV. Im using an old android spare phone - its on about 90% high. Should i measure from my sleeping position with frequncsee? thanks. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 08-12-2020 (08-12-2020, 12:26 PM)Wiseg9999 Wrote: Shannon, how do i know if OF 5.75 is loud enough on US format? Shannon’s current official answer to that question, as posted by him a day or two ago is: Quote:Calibrate volume using an audible track, make it comfortable, and make sure that you can both hear the lowest levels of the ocean surf and the highest levels are not too loud. That should be the right volume for all the tracks, and if you find that is too loud with the ultrasonic track, lower it some. |