+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 06-25-2020
@Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Griffin - 06-25-2020
@Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-25-2020
(06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - fab10 - 06-25-2020
(06-25-2020, 01:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
Oh please let it be on, I don’t think I can do without it ever again.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - samba99 - 06-26-2020
Shannon, after creating 6g, have you thought about creating a software that will allow users to choose their own end goals, then based on that the software will choose the appropriate modules and start building the sub for the user.
More like custom but at faster rate and affordable for everyone.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - NOMAD - 06-26-2020
(06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: @Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-26-2020
(06-25-2020, 01:37 PM)fab10 Wrote:(06-25-2020, 01:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
Oh please let it be on, I don’t think I can do without it ever again.
LOL I hear ya. It's very likely to be on, given how much the models, and you guys, seem to like it. We shall see. I give it 95%+ odds.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-26-2020
(06-26-2020, 05:16 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, after creating 6g, have you thought about creating a software that will allow users to choose their own end goals, then based on that the software will choose the appropriate modules and start building the sub for the user.
More like custom but at faster rate and affordable for everyone.
I have thought about that. But there are some very good reasons why it hasn't happened yet, and may never happen. When certain things change, I'll be looking into it. Otherwise, it would require one or both of two resources that I don't have enough of at the moment, even if I decide I am willing to do it.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-26-2020
(06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote:(06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: @Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 06-26-2020
(06-26-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote:(06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: @Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
Gawd,I HOpe UMS2 will be built first! thats definitely my vote,but if not first then certainly next there after with 5.85 at the helm ,by then!!C'mon UMS2 Train!! w/ FRM 4.9 & DRS!! Yes!!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Hanpan - 06-26-2020
(06-26-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote:(06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: @Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
Have you thought about how OF will work inside LTU6?
Will it "just" be in the form of FRM, or will it have a separate module, which I think would be amazing?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 06-26-2020
(06-26-2020, 09:54 AM)Hanpan Wrote:(06-26-2020, 09:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-26-2020, 07:23 AM)NOMAD Wrote:(06-25-2020, 12:01 PM)Griffin Wrote: @Shannon
When you have decided to either build UMS2 or LTU6 could you let us know?
if you build LTU and then DMSI and then UMS(which is the one I am waiting for) then I might buy OF, but since money is tight If you are building UMS first I will wait.
Thank you and please let us know when you have decided.
I second this request, although my vote for the next sub is LTU6.
If you determine that UMS2 is the next sub to be built, then DMSI after that, my estimation is that I would have 2-3 months to give OF 5.75/5.85? a decent run prior to LTU6 release. I realize that's not the 8 month stretch of time prescribed in the product description, but I'm intrigued at the results so far. I've been running LTU5 for over a year now and I theorize that shifting gears to focus on overall fear removal would unlock some of the dormant ground-level scripting that LTU5 has laid over time. As an extension of this, I suspect that OF 5.75/5.85? might be the better option leading up to LTU6 than continuing with LTU5.
Long story short, please let us know as soon as you determine what the next sub will be.
The models have advised me that in spite of the massive jump in power with OF, I should not transition to the 5.85G moniker yet. So we will be using 5.75G for the time being.
It also seems to be suggesting that LTU6 will be the better choice for first program built, which kind of surprises me. But that answer has not yet been verified.
You guys will know when I know.
Have you thought about how OF will work inside LTU6?
Will it "just" be in the form of FRM, or will it have a separate module, which I think would be amazing?
I don't think you understand how all this works. OF is FRM 4.9, with a couple of statements that direct it to allow it to function as a stand alone subliminal. FRM is a module in the skeleton script. OF is FRM 4.9, with a goal of removing fear. FRM is a module that seeks to remove the fears that stand in the way of achieving the primary goals of the program.
So I don't have to think of how OF will work inside LTU6, because OF won't be in LTU6 - FRM 4.9 will. And it will be aimed at removing the fears that stand in the way of achieving all of the goals LTU6 has.
"Just" FRM is what makes OF work; it's just being directed back to itself as a main goal for the program. And FRM already is a module in skeleton script.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Catman - 06-26-2020
Hi Shannon.
I remember you said you were working "round robin", and were waiting to make FRM 4.9 before you made DMSI. 4.9 is here. Then you made OF. Now...it seems you're making a drug sub? Also making ANOTHER sub ahead of DMSI now suddenly, a massively detailed multi-stage one that will no doubt take an extremely long time to make? What happened to it being made after FRM 4.9? Are you saying now it's being pushed back by months...again? (This just brings up familiar feelings of the program being backburnered is all...)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 06-26-2020
(06-26-2020, 09:04 AM)Shannon Wrote:(06-25-2020, 01:37 PM)fab10 Wrote:(06-25-2020, 01:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-25-2020, 11:49 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon
How is the Drug Addiction program coming along?
I’m really looking forward to the rebuild of E4. I imagine it will be super powerful with FRM 4.9 and the new build process
It’s hard to believe E3 had FRM 4.5 in it
I wouldn't really call it a drug addiction program. The goals are to shut down any psychological, not physical, dependency on a specific type of drug; increase the user's determination to get fully healthy; and increase the person's energy levels. It's too specific to be worth trying to sell, but I have concluded that we could just turn off some script statements and build a program for boosting your energy levels from it. I'm working on it right now, and it should be done in a few days if things go well.
It's hard to believe that E3 came out so long ago... seems like just yesterday. I'm really curious as to whether the models will indicate that DRS should be on in E4.
Oh please let it be on, I don’t think I can do without it ever again.
LOL I hear ya. It's very likely to be on, given how much the models, and you guys, seem to like it. We shall see. I give it 95%+ odds.
Ive never run DRS before. I wonder it will interact with E4?