Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ImFreeman - 03-21-2016 What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women. Or ASC is about a general wellbeing feeling of state where we have a general confidence in our abilities to 'have control of our lives' ? I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it. In that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble) I think that would provide even more fast and long lasting results than just providing the state of confidence, and waiting for the user to generate the new experiences. Would this be possible? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women. What you're referring to is self-efficacy, or your belief in your ability in a specific thing. For instance, I had a professor in college who has a high self-efficacy for exercise - so much so that she wouldn't ever miss an exercise session - even on vacation. Most people display low self-efficacy there, and thus don't exercise on vacation. I imagine the sub would be designed to increase your belief in yourself in a general sense that would extend to developing high self-efficacy in many different areas of your life. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 03-21-2016 Hey Shannon, Since you were talking about football programs that magnify the results of BAMM, have you ever considered creating footballs on AM/SM/BASE? It'd be great if we can get extra results based on existing technology. You can implement the 6G tech in the football magnifier in order to make AM and other programs more effective. Practically speaking you don't even need to create new programs if you can create 6G magnifiers. I know they will still be created regardless. You can release the footballs fast so we get a taste of 6G, and create the new 6G programs while we are enjoying it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it. This is indeed what I was thinking about with my post, yes, like a hypnotist saying "think of a time when you felt extremely confident" and has you anchor the resulting remembered state. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women. That is exactly what I am talking about. Basically what I will be seeking to do in the next ASC is not only associate existing confidence with other things that it can be applied to, but to create the experiences, internally and externally, which result in stable confidence. I have to determine whether or not it would be the best and safest option to "rewrite the past", but that is a possibility. I have to make sure that doing such a thing does not generate any sort of cognitive dissonance, or anything that could even remotely be or become harmful. It can also be done by using a couple of very advanced methods I don't care to divulge, which are 6G secrets. Whatever I determine to be the safest and simultaneously most effective ways forward. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 12:36 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Hey Shannon, The reason for the football in BAMM is to avoid rebuilding the base program because it is so ridiculously huge and complex, and because it is not necessary to do so given the use of a football. But, all three of those programs, AM, SM and WM, would massively benefit from a complete rebuild using modern technology and my current understanding based on R&D and observing the challenges people have experienced using them. The idea may seem good to you, but you would not think so if you knew what I know. Better to forego footballs wherever possible and build the whole thing from scratch. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dubls - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women. My understanding of what ASC has always been is to create absolute self-confidence in the broadest and most general sense of the term so that it can be felt and applied to every aspect of one's life. Shannon might have something to add, but that's how I think it should be and continue to be. (03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: in that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble) There is a distinction to be made between rewriting the past and simply changing how you think/feel about it. I can only speak to AM6, but the subs (that are targeted to do so) already work to create the latter. In the past year I have certainly reframed some of my perceptions without rewriting history in my mind. And feedback to Shannon would be that there is always room for placing more emphasis on this aspect of development. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 07:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women. If you succeeded in making subs that rewrite past negative memories, then there wouldn't be a reason to tap on them and flip them to be positive! It'd already be done via the sub RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 07:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(03-21-2016, 07:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women. It's do-able. I just have to figure out how to do it safely. That's priority #1. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bliss - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 07:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women. Wow, very interesting ideas. I personally can't wait until I run ASC, hopefully the new one is out by then RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 03-21-2016 (03-19-2016, 01:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: You don't ever want to attempt to manifest a specific person. Manifest someone who is "perfect ___" or focus on features without defining face or person. I wonder about one thing, would it be ok to use a face if you knew the other person wants you, too? You know, to accelerate things. In theory it wouldn't be against her free will. Just asking. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 10:56 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(03-19-2016, 01:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: You don't ever want to attempt to manifest a specific person. Manifest someone who is "perfect ___" or focus on features without defining face or person. I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex... Then a mutual friend told me in private that the girl wasn't interested. Hopefully it works out better for you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016 (03-21-2016, 10:56 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(03-19-2016, 01:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: You don't ever want to attempt to manifest a specific person. Manifest someone who is "perfect ___" or focus on features without defining face or person. The only way it can work without backlash - and even then, only sometimes - is if the person fully understands what you are trying to do and genuinely consents to it of their own free will. And even then sometimes there can be issues. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 03-22-2016 Quote:I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex. The friend sounds full of shit and a cockblock. |