Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ImFreeman - 03-21-2016

What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women.

Or ASC is about a general wellbeing feeling of state where we have a general confidence in our abilities to 'have control of our lives' ?

I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it. In that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble)

I think that would provide even more fast and long lasting results than just providing the state of confidence, and waiting for the user to generate the new experiences.

Would this be possible?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women.

What you're referring to is self-efficacy, or your belief in your ability in a specific thing. For instance, I had a professor in college who has a high self-efficacy for exercise - so much so that she wouldn't ever miss an exercise session - even on vacation. Most people display low self-efficacy there, and thus don't exercise on vacation. I imagine the sub would be designed to increase your belief in yourself in a general sense that would extend to developing high self-efficacy in many different areas of your life.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 03-21-2016

Hey Shannon,

Since you were talking about football programs that magnify the results of BAMM, have you ever considered creating footballs on AM/SM/BASE? It'd be great if we can get extra results based on existing technology. You can implement the 6G tech in the football magnifier in order to make AM and other programs more effective.

Practically speaking you don't even need to create new programs if you can create 6G magnifiers. I know they will still be created regardless. You can release the footballs fast so we get a taste of 6G, and create the new 6G programs while we are enjoying it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it.

This is indeed what I was thinking about with my post, yes, like a hypnotist saying "think of a time when you felt extremely confident" and has you anchor the resulting remembered state.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women.

Or ASC is about a general wellbeing feeling of state where we have a general confidence in our abilities to 'have control of our lives' ?

I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it. In that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble)

I think that would provide even more fast and long lasting results than just providing the state of confidence, and waiting for the user to generate the new experiences.

Would this be possible?

That is exactly what I am talking about. Basically what I will be seeking to do in the next ASC is not only associate existing confidence with other things that it can be applied to, but to create the experiences, internally and externally, which result in stable confidence.

I have to determine whether or not it would be the best and safest option to "rewrite the past", but that is a possibility. I have to make sure that doing such a thing does not generate any sort of cognitive dissonance, or anything that could even remotely be or become harmful.

It can also be done by using a couple of very advanced methods I don't care to divulge, which are 6G secrets.

Whatever I determine to be the safest and simultaneously most effective ways forward.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 12:36 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Hey Shannon,

Since you were talking about football programs that magnify the results of BAMM, have you ever considered creating footballs on AM/SM/BASE? It'd be great if we can get extra results based on existing technology. You can implement the 6G tech in the football magnifier in order to make AM and other programs more effective.

Practically speaking you don't even need to create new programs if you can create 6G magnifiers. I know they will still be created regardless. You can release the footballs fast so we get a taste of 6G, and create the new 6G programs while we are enjoying it.

The reason for the football in BAMM is to avoid rebuilding the base program because it is so ridiculously huge and complex, and because it is not necessary to do so given the use of a football.

But, all three of those programs, AM, SM and WM, would massively benefit from a complete rebuild using modern technology and my current understanding based on R&D and observing the challenges people have experienced using them.

The idea may seem good to you, but you would not think so if you knew what I know. Better to forego footballs wherever possible and build the whole thing from scratch.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dubls - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women.

My understanding of what ASC has always been is to create absolute self-confidence in the broadest and most general sense of the term so that it can be felt and applied to every aspect of one's life. Shannon might have something to add, but that's how I think it should be and continue to be.

(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: in that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble)

There is a distinction to be made between rewriting the past and simply changing how you think/feel about it. I can only speak to AM6, but the subs (that are targeted to do so) already work to create the latter. In the past year I have certainly reframed some of my perceptions without rewriting history in my mind. And feedback to Shannon would be that there is always room for placing more emphasis on this aspect of development.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 07:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women.

Or ASC is about a general wellbeing feeling of state where we have a general confidence in our abilities to 'have control of our lives' ?

I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it. In that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble)

I think that would provide even more fast and long lasting results than just providing the state of confidence, and waiting for the user to generate the new experiences.

Would this be possible?

That is exactly what I am talking about. Basically what I will be seeking to do in the next ASC is not only associate existing confidence with other things that it can be applied to, but to create the experiences, internally and externally, which result in stable confidence.

I have to determine whether or not it would be the best and safest option to "rewrite the past", but that is a possibility. I have to make sure that doing such a thing does not generate any sort of cognitive dissonance, or anything that could even remotely be or become harmful.

It can also be done by using a couple of very advanced methods I don't care to divulge, which are 6G secrets.

Whatever I determine to be the safest and simultaneously most effective ways forward.

If you succeeded in making subs that rewrite past negative memories, then there wouldn't be a reason to tap on them and flip them to be positive! It'd already be done via the sub Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 07:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(03-21-2016, 07:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women.

Or ASC is about a general wellbeing feeling of state where we have a general confidence in our abilities to 'have control of our lives' ?

I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it. In that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble)

I think that would provide even more fast and long lasting results than just providing the state of confidence, and waiting for the user to generate the new experiences.

Would this be possible?

That is exactly what I am talking about. Basically what I will be seeking to do in the next ASC is not only associate existing confidence with other things that it can be applied to, but to create the experiences, internally and externally, which result in stable confidence.

I have to determine whether or not it would be the best and safest option to "rewrite the past", but that is a possibility. I have to make sure that doing such a thing does not generate any sort of cognitive dissonance, or anything that could even remotely be or become harmful.

It can also be done by using a couple of very advanced methods I don't care to divulge, which are 6G secrets.

Whatever I determine to be the safest and simultaneously most effective ways forward.

If you succeeded in making subs that rewrite past negative memories, then there wouldn't be a reason to tap on them and flip them to be positive! It'd already be done via the sub Big Grin

It's do-able. I just have to figure out how to do it safely. That's priority #1.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bliss - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 07:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-21-2016, 04:52 AM)ImFreeman Wrote: What kind of confidence are we talking about?, because we can be confident in our abilities in diferent things in our life depending on our experience doing them, for ex a nerd can have a lot of confidence studying and taking exams but no confidence whatsoever regarding women.

Or ASC is about a general wellbeing feeling of state where we have a general confidence in our abilities to 'have control of our lives' ?

I found that self regenerating state Shannon talks about is mostly based on past experience. It really is deep and stable confidence when you have an array of past experiences to support it. In that regard, I think (maybe Shannon already does this), there should be a 'rewrite the past' kind of script to adjust our past experiences (not just our beliefs, but our memories of those experiences) to make it congruent with the beliefs we are trying to instill ... (of course there could be a breach between reality and those memories, that has to be accounted for in a way that causes no trouble)

I think that would provide even more fast and long lasting results than just providing the state of confidence, and waiting for the user to generate the new experiences.

Would this be possible?

That is exactly what I am talking about. Basically what I will be seeking to do in the next ASC is not only associate existing confidence with other things that it can be applied to, but to create the experiences, internally and externally, which result in stable confidence.

I have to determine whether or not it would be the best and safest option to "rewrite the past", but that is a possibility. I have to make sure that doing such a thing does not generate any sort of cognitive dissonance, or anything that could even remotely be or become harmful.

It can also be done by using a couple of very advanced methods I don't care to divulge, which are 6G secrets.

Whatever I determine to be the safest and simultaneously most effective ways forward.

Wow, very interesting ideas. I personally can't wait until I run ASC, hopefully the new one is out by then


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 03-21-2016

(03-19-2016, 01:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: You don't ever want to attempt to manifest a specific person. Manifest someone who is "perfect ___" or focus on features without defining face or person.

I wonder about one thing, would it be ok to use a face if you knew the other person wants you, too? You know, to accelerate things. In theory it wouldn't be against her free will. Just asking.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 10:56 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-19-2016, 01:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: You don't ever want to attempt to manifest a specific person. Manifest someone who is "perfect ___" or focus on features without defining face or person.

I wonder about one thing, would it be ok to use a face if you knew the other person wants you, too? You know, to accelerate things. In theory it wouldn't be against her free will. Just asking.

I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex... Then a mutual friend told me in private that the girl wasn't interested.

Hopefully it works out better for you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-21-2016

(03-21-2016, 10:56 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-19-2016, 01:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: You don't ever want to attempt to manifest a specific person. Manifest someone who is "perfect ___" or focus on features without defining face or person.

I wonder about one thing, would it be ok to use a face if you knew the other person wants you, too? You know, to accelerate things. In theory it wouldn't be against her free will. Just asking.

The only way it can work without backlash - and even then, only sometimes - is if the person fully understands what you are trying to do and genuinely consents to it of their own free will.

And even then sometimes there can be issues.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 03-22-2016

Quote:I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex.

The friend sounds full of shit and a cockblock.