Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 10-19-2019

(10-19-2019, 03:34 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(10-19-2019, 08:04 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-19-2019, 04:28 AM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon!

Just an idea for the next program to build after the intriguing "mystery program", haha...

My good friend, she's crippled badly by depression. I got her E3, but she washed out of it after a short while. It's a pattern with her, if something isn't instant, or has any difficulty, she bolts and just uses it to further reinforce the issue. "See...I told you it wouldn't work" etc., meanwhile never giving it the CHANCE to. Aggravating, because I receive endless whining about her issue. Not sure what I'm supposed to "do" about it, I'm not a psychologist and with her always running away from it, it won't be challenged and solved.

She has a crippling phobia, that works hand in hand seemingly with depression. They play off each other, probably a sense of futility stemming from it etc. That said, I think an update to refresh DRA to current specs would do her well. Now, I understand the "mystery program", as you've made tweaks to it since DMSI's and ARA's releases, make it the most powerful program? So, either a brand new DRA at it's level, or beyond, could do well for her I think. Maybe it can finally bring her out of this rut she's been unable to climb out of in like 20 years...I'm surprised PTPA isn't in DRA actually as well.

Thank you for this, Shannon. By the way, I will write a thread for ARA 5.75G, which I've bought for my brother. I believe you'll be very pleased to hear about that experience...

DRA is in my list of options to choose from.  The "mystery program" is based on the skeleton script that was used by ARA, LFC and Awakener.  The difference here is what the key and core scripts are, and it has one update to the skeleton script.  That update makes it more powerful in a specific, narrow direction, and that update will be standard in the skeleton script until it is updated again in that module.  But they should all be equally powerful overall. 

I don't remember if PTPA was in the last one, but it will be in the next one.

One way or the other, nothing is going to help if every time it starts doing it's job, she bolts and runs away.  But DRA is one of the options in my list.

Great to hear, Shannon!

Well I can say DMSI V3.3.2 may finally be seemingly starting to do some things for me at least internally. Also, if you coupled that with the shocking results my brother has received from ARA, I really want DRA to be remade so my friend can have some amazing benefit too. This will really be a life-changer for her, and many others no doubt, given how the new subs seem to function now.

I'm happy to hear it's a possible option for the next sub to create. I think it can be a slam dunk now. Especially given the results both my brother and I have experienced with our equally difficult sticking points seeing traction at last.

Please do tell about what ARA has done for your brother.  I don't think I have seen any posts about that.

Quote:EDIT: Just read another thread where you were talking about releasing a special experimental DMSI to test some theory on fear. I wholeheartedly volunteer to test this sub immediately. After all, if it can advance me, it's logical it can advance most others. Makes sense to release it for testing at least to a tester like me. That's far too much an intriguing prospect for me to turn down. Please consider that. Thank you very much, Shannon. Looking forward to seeing that release, I truly hope you do it.

That is a possibility, not a certainty.  I am still in the process of researching how to adjust and improve FRM and turn it into FRM 4.9.  I have to have that finished before it's even worth thinking about.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Greenduck - 10-20-2019

I’m curious Shannon, what are the outcomes from running DMSI versus SM? What kind of results should you be after for them respectively. They both are directed for the same goal, achieving sex - but I have a hard time wrapping my head around the differences so an example of what they will produce would help clarifying that.

Could you perhaps say that DMSI bring out girls strongest desire to sleep with the user, while with SM the user learn to bring out the strongest sexual essence in girls?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - josh84 - 10-20-2019

Hi Shannon, ive done 2 cycles of 8 days 4 loops the 2nd cycle was entire 8 days 4 loops with bone conductor headphones with no results yet, currently on day 3 of bloom.

Ive been around women daily, and it seems im invisible to them, even ones im interested in and not the hottest but attractive and can be around them for an hour within 50 feet and no reactions.

Internally no changes or feelings so far either or dreams.

What might you suggest i try this 3rd cycle.

Also my phone died yesterday so got a new samsung 10 plus not sure if that has active noise cancelling if i was used ultrasonic through phone. I havent used the new phone for the subliminal yet.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Rossignol17 - 10-20-2019

Shannon,

Here is what I previously posted :



(10-11-2019, 06:21 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote:
Thank you Benjamin and THolt for your replies. I am looking forward to going on USLM4.2 when it is upgraded. If it works better than version 3, it will be amazing ! I am sooooo tempted to just switch back to USLM3 right now, but I have been running UMS for 3 months and I really want to give it a fair shot, so I will stay on it, even though no financial improvements are happening for me.

(10-11-2019, 07:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
If you're not getting financial improvements, it's almost certainly an issue with how and how much you're using it. What are your usage patterns?

(10-11-2019, 11:47 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote:
I started out with 1x1 and 7x0 per the original instructions. I gradually increased my loops and then decreased my days off, depending on how I was feeling. After the initial month, I was able to use it more frequently without feeling completely exhausted by it. I am now doing 4x5 and 3x0. I tried lengthening the bloom period but nothing was happening and I was feeling the need to run loops after 3 or 4 days. I have been very consistent with my listening schedule and I play the masked format on wired earbuds. I usually listen right before bed and I have no trouble falling asleep while it is playing. I can confirm that the program has played and that my earbuds are still in my ears when I wake up, so that has never been an issue.

(10-12-2019, 06:01 AM)Shannon Wrote:
You say you feel the need to run more loops after 3-4 days. That means the program is executing. Which means something in you is resisting the program.

Did you allow that same urge to guide you in how many loops per day and how many days off?

Also, are you using ultrasonic with earbuds? What format are you using? And what volume?

Rossignol17 Wrote:
Yes, I allowed the same urge to guide me with both number of loops and days off.

I am using the FLAC version, masked trickling stream at a volume of 23 or 24/100. It is a comfortable volume that is pleasant to listen to.......not too loud, not too quiet. I use wired earbuds on a Cowan Plenue player. I cannot use the ultrasonic because it gives me horrible vertigo, even wirh the hybrid version.

I don't understand how I could execute USLM3 so perfectly, and not execute UMS at all. My goals for USLM3 were financial with that sub. I am getting plenty of exposure and it has been 3 months of usage.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 10-21-2019

(10-20-2019, 03:20 PM)Greenduck Wrote: I’m curious Shannon, what are the outcomes from running DMSI versus SM? What kind of results should you be after for them respectively. They both are directed for the same goal, achieving sex - but I have a hard time wrapping my head around the differences so an example of what they will produce would help clarifying that.

Could you perhaps say that DMSI bring out girls strongest desire to sleep with the user, while with SM the user learn to bring out the strongest sexual essence in girls?

This question can be answered by doing your due diligence.  It's already been answered a number of times over the years.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 10-21-2019

(10-20-2019, 10:45 PM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon, ive done 2 cycles of 8 days 4 loops the 2nd cycle was entire 8 days 4 loops with bone conductor headphones with no results yet, currently on day 3 of bloom.

Ive been around women daily, and it seems im invisible to them, even ones im interested in and not the hottest but attractive and can be around them for an hour within 50 feet and no reactions.

Internally no changes or feelings so far either or dreams.

What might you suggest i try this 3rd cycle.

Also my phone died yesterday so got a new samsung 10 plus not sure if that has active noise cancelling if i was used ultrasonic through phone. I havent used the new phone for the subliminal yet.

I suggest you start carpet bombing using the ultrasonic or one of the hybrid tracks.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Greenduck - 10-21-2019

(10-21-2019, 08:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-20-2019, 03:20 PM)Greenduck Wrote: I’m curious Shannon, what are the outcomes from running DMSI versus SM? What kind of results should you be after for them respectively. They both are directed for the same goal, achieving sex - but I have a hard time wrapping my head around the differences so an example of what they will produce would help clarifying that.

Could you perhaps say that DMSI bring out girls strongest desire to sleep with the user, while with SM the user learn to bring out the strongest sexual essence in girls?

This question can be answered by doing your due diligence.  It's already been answered a number of times over the years.

I wouldn't have any problems with doing that, but I don't find the search function working properly to be able to do that. Searching for "DMSI SM" DMSI Sex machine" or by replacing the blank with a + only generate a small amount of hits in the forum. Maybe I'm doing it wrong?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 10-21-2019

(10-20-2019, 11:43 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote: Shannon,

Here is what I previously posted :



(10-11-2019, 06:21 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote:
Thank you Benjamin and THolt for your replies.  I am looking forward to going on USLM4.2 when it is upgraded.  If it works better than version 3, it will be amazing !  I am sooooo tempted to just switch back to USLM3 right now, but I have been running UMS for 3 months and I really want to give it a fair shot, so I will stay on it, even though no financial improvements are happening for me.

(10-11-2019, 07:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
If you're not getting financial improvements, it's almost certainly an issue with how and how much you're using it.  What are your usage patterns?

(10-11-2019, 11:47 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote:
I started out with 1x1 and 7x0 per the original instructions.  I gradually increased my loops and then decreased my days off, depending on how I was feeling.  After the initial month, I was able to use it more frequently without feeling completely exhausted by it. I am now doing 4x5 and 3x0.  I tried lengthening the bloom period but nothing was happening and I was feeling the need to run loops after 3 or 4 days.  I have been very consistent with my listening schedule and I play the masked format on wired earbuds.  I usually listen right before bed and I have no trouble falling asleep while it is playing.  I can confirm that the program has played and that my earbuds are still in my ears when I wake up, so that has never been an issue.

(10-12-2019, 06:01 AM)Shannon Wrote:
You say you feel the need to run more loops after 3-4 days.  That means the program is executing.  Which means something in you is resisting the program.

Did you allow that same urge to guide you in how many loops per day and how many days off?

Also, are you using ultrasonic with earbuds?  What format are you using?  And what volume?

Rossignol17 Wrote:
Yes, I allowed the same urge to guide me with both number of loops and days off.

I am using the FLAC version, masked trickling stream at a volume of 23 or 24/100. It is a comfortable volume that is pleasant to listen to.......not too loud, not too quiet. I use wired earbuds on a Cowan Plenue player. I cannot use the ultrasonic because it gives me horrible vertigo, even wirh the hybrid version.

I don't understand how I could execute USLM3 so perfectly, and not execute UMS at all. My goals for USLM3 were financial with that sub. I am getting plenty of exposure and it has been 3 months of usage.

Alright.  So if the ultrasonic gives you vertigo, this may be a defense mechanism against the most effective format.  Can you use it laying down with your eyes open or closed and have the feeling be bearable?

If not, I suggest you start trying to carpet bomb every night all night until you start getting more obvious results.

To answer your question, the closer you get to achieving a goal that scares your subconscious, the harder it will fight to prevent that outcome from happening.  The fact that USLM3 executed well, but this does not means this is making you much more likely to (and probably much more directly) achieve one or more goals that terrifies your subconscious.  It means that harder resistance is required to stop your success.  It means the program is more powerful and more successfully targeting the achievement of its goals.  You just have to use it enough to override that response.

I suspect that your vertigo in response to the ultrasonic is aimed to prevent that very thing.  Perhaps you can set up a playlist that uses the ultrasonic, and have it start playing an hour after you go to sleep.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 10-21-2019

@Shannon

Congrats on the two new subs.

In the near future, are you going to release a sleep aid sub that can be used in conjunction with whatever other sub you are using.
i am considering the anxiety sub because my mind won't shut off at night when i try to sleep.
I want to keep running UMS as I feel like I am battling through some resistance on it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Have at ye - 10-21-2019

There's a sleep induction aid already, I believe? I think you can use it with other subs IIRC; don't take my word for it though.

The tranquilizer series sounds interesting.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Hanpan - 10-21-2019

Hey Shannon. The new tranquilizer subs sounds great.

What will be the difference between using tranquilizer as an "instant on" along with the recommended loops on ARA at night vs. using the the recommended loops on ARA at night and using ARA as an "instant on" instead of the tranquilizer?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - ncbeareatingman - 10-21-2019

Great just what the world needs ,more of Man...more peacefulness and calmness..great addition to the already growing cataloge of IML sub's.... http://www.subliminal-shop.com/product/tranqualizer-a-5-75g/

IM getting an Image of "Lurch" answering the door from the Adams Family "You Rang!?" like that chilled ,but not that dead! Ha!
Love ta read more about people's experiences with the Tranquilizer!!
Look! Gawd-Jeera!
"The Tranqulizer Meets the Naturalizer" sounds like a 1950's Black n White B-Movie, ONLY Much much better!! :-)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 10-21-2019

(10-21-2019, 08:36 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon

Congrats on the two new subs.

In the near future, are you going to release a sleep aid sub that can be used in conjunction with whatever other sub you are using.
i am considering the anxiety sub because my mind won't shut off at night when i try to sleep.
I want to keep running UMS as I feel like I am battling through some resistance on it.

The sleep aid that corresponds to the 5.75G Awakener is being developed, but it is a much more challenging job than the Awakener was.  It is much safer to wake up than fall asleep.  So I am not only having to find a way to get as many people as possible to actually fall asleep in response to the sleep aid, I have to find ways to make sure it only works while sleeping is a safe activity, and at the same time, overriding that when "safe" is defined incorrectly by PTSD and fear.

In other words, it's almost impossible.

As a result, I am having to be very creative.  I am now working specifically on making the program just work well enough to make its users happy.  Once I have that accomplished, I'll be working on making the program work at the same time it only works when it is safe for it to work.  IF I can accomplish that, then I will release a version of it for public consumption and start working on a different version for PTSD/phobia sufferers.

The key is, this MUST be safe.  If it cannot be made safe, it may never be released.  That is very important, and VERY challenging.

You could try the ARA 1 loop for sleep, but I can't guarantee that ARA will solve your problem.  If it's caused by anxiety, probably will.  If not, may not.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 10-21-2019

(10-21-2019, 08:55 AM)Have at ye Wrote: There's a sleep induction aid already, I believe? I think you can use it with other subs IIRC; don't take my word for it though.

The tranquilizer series sounds interesting.

The 5G SIA, yes.  That is a very good program still.  Not the fastest, nor 100% effective in all situations, but I still use it a lot.