DMSI next version ideas - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Product Discussion (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Product-Discussion) +--- Thread: DMSI next version ideas (/Thread-DMSI-next-version-ideas) |
RE: DMSI next version ideas - Raykon - 10-05-2016 I want overcome premature ejaculation, NSFM, Increase penis size if the user subconsciously desires his penis to grow bigger and balance brain hemispheres in 3.0. I also want the program to make woman want to date you too not just want to bang. (but the user still is in control of the direction of the relationship.) RE: DMSI next version ideas - SargeMaximus - 10-05-2016 Great posts in this topic!!! As for me, I just want women to be my sexual release as I go about my day. Should be easy enough as I believe it's very natural. Anyhow, some cool posts here: (09-05-2016, 07:25 AM)Inconceivablezen Wrote:(08-29-2016, 01:58 AM)Shannon Wrote: So there's no such thing as, say, radioactivity? Light? Heat I think you're wrong about there being no such thing as nonphysical energy sources. In fact, I would say that it is actually not even true that physical matter is the majority of all representation of energy. /\ This is beyond cool! I'm buying the second book now, but the first book is expensive so I have to wait. (09-29-2016, 06:18 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-29-2016, 04:53 AM)skeps Wrote:(09-28-2016, 02:44 PM)Shannon Wrote: That should work already when and if the program achieves all of its goals. Indeed. I believe this. When I was on SM 3 I got some crazy interactions from women using the same profile I used for years and got nothing. RE: DMSI next version ideas - maxx55 - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 08:17 AM)Rayhon Wrote: I want overcome premature ejaculation, NSFM, Increase penis size if the user subconsciously desires his penis to grow bigger and balance brain hemispheres in 3.0. It'd be nice if Shannon could add all of this in without sacrificing effectiveness, but I don't think he'lol add in OP or IYPS (But please Shannon, really think about adding increase your penis size! It'd be sooo convenient to just do DMSI long term then). I think having the program make the women want to date you would just make it better for everyone. This needs to be added. The same way the program snipes women sexually, it should snipe the women you'd like to date and have them desire and crave to date the user just as much if not more than him. If you don't want to "date" anyone, you won't have to. If you'd like to "date" them, then they definitely want to date you. And they should still be happy with "sharing" you. This totally fits in with that statement about allowing friends w/benefits. Win win win! RE: DMSI next version ideas - Shannon - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 08:17 AM)Rayhon Wrote: I want overcome premature ejaculation, NSFM, Increase penis size if the user subconsciously desires his penis to grow bigger and balance brain hemispheres in 3.0. Program Goals: 1. Get the user to be irresistibly sexually attractive. 2. Get affected to initiate and have sex. 3. Be gender and sexual orientation independent. Request: 1. Relationships, not just sex. 2. Overcome premature ejaculation. (Which, let's face it, is male only - slowing down female orgasm is NOT the goal of any man's dreams unless he's into orgasm denial) 3. NSFM (Which is already slated for addition as NSFEverybody) 4. Increase Penis Size (because so many women are concerned that their penises aren't big enough, of course) 5. Balance brain hemispheres... See any disparity here? RE: DMSI next version ideas - bits - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 10:00 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(10-05-2016, 08:17 AM)Rayhon Wrote: I want overcome premature ejaculation, NSFM, Increase penis size if the user subconsciously desires his penis to grow bigger and balance brain hemispheres in 3.0. date as in see each other over and over again but keep things casual or date as in relationship? In either case I think the subliminal user could guide it in either direction. Unless a woman hates your personality there wouldnt be much reason for her to not sleep with you and see you repeatedly or get into a relationship if thats what shes looking for. RE: DMSI next version ideas - Raykon - 10-05-2016 I could see IYPS not be added if the program remains unisex but if it becomes male only then I could see it being introduced. And Balance brain hemispheres because you can think more clearly and effectively when the hemispheres are balanced and that would be beneficial in gaming and interacting with women. RE: DMSI next version ideas - Raykon - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 10:45 AM)bits Wrote:(10-05-2016, 10:00 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(10-05-2016, 08:17 AM)Rayhon Wrote: I want overcome premature ejaculation, NSFM, Increase penis size if the user subconsciously desires his penis to grow bigger and balance brain hemispheres in 3.0. I just think it would be a good idea for the women to fall in love with you on both a emotional level and sexual level right from the get go. And the user decide where he wants to go from there whether a relationship or fuck buddies. RE: DMSI next version ideas - maxx55 - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 11:11 AM)Rayhon Wrote:This.(10-05-2016, 10:45 AM)bits Wrote:(10-05-2016, 10:00 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(10-05-2016, 08:17 AM)Rayhon Wrote: I want overcome premature ejaculation, NSFM, Increase penis size if the user subconsciously desires his penis to grow bigger and balance brain hemispheres in 3.0. Either this or have those who respond match emotional depth of the user at least. I don't see this conflicting with the goal. If the script can allow friends with benefits, then it can definitely accommodate a statement that has responders "emotionally connect" with the user. I know I'd never want to be in a situation where there's an awesome girl I'm having sex with and would like to be around more but she doesn't feel the same way. I'm sure women would appreciate it as well if the program stays unisex. RE: DMSI next version ideas - Shannon - 10-05-2016 I'm not adding IYPS to DMSI. I'm not going to make it dates... I have been for a while contemplating a version that would be romantic and sexual irresistibility. Quote:I just think it would be a good idea for the women to fall in love with you on both a emotional level and sexual level right from the get go. And the user decide where he wants to go from there whether a relationship or **** buddies. And this is really not a good idea for a variety of reasons, including stalkers, universal usefulness, unwise manipulation of others, and more. Brain activity is already being adjusted for achieving the goal. RE: DMSI next version ideas - maxx55 - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 12:23 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not adding IYPS to DMSI. So if you made a version that had both sexual and romantic irresistibility, would there be any advantage to using the purely sexual version? I want the best of both worlds; options on steering the relationships. RE: DMSI next version ideas - Shawn - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 02:08 PM)maxx55 Wrote: So if you made a version that had both sexual and romantic irresistibility, would there be any advantage to using the purely sexual version? I want the best of both worlds; options on steering the relationships. Yes, for those who want a purely sexual relationship. RE: DMSI next version ideas - maxx55 - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 02:18 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(10-05-2016, 02:08 PM)maxx55 Wrote: So if you made a version that had both sexual and romantic irresistibility, would there be any advantage to using the purely sexual version? I want the best of both worlds; options on steering the relationships. I'd assume that a version for maximum sexual and romantic irresistibility would result in a variety of relationships: open, FWBs, pure sexual (fuck buddy), maybe monogamous. For ex. All girls who would respond to the purely sexual version would respond to this one as well, but more than just them would be affected. RE: DMSI next version ideas - Benjamin - 10-05-2016 Quote:It'd be nice if Shannon could add all of this in without sacrificing effectiveness, but I don't think he'lol add in OP or IYPS (But please Shannon, really think about adding increase your penis size! It'd be sooo convenient to just do DMSI long term then). That doesn't really go along with it. What about the people that don't want a bigger penis? Or if somebody has too big a penis? Hahaha RE: DMSI next version ideas - SargeMaximus - 10-05-2016 (10-05-2016, 03:55 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:It'd be nice if Shannon could add all of this in without sacrificing effectiveness, but I don't think he'lol add in OP or IYPS (But please Shannon, really think about adding increase your penis size! It'd be sooo convenient to just do DMSI long term then). |