Does listening to these subs while sleeping while one ear is on a pillow affect anything?
@Shannon

(08-09-2024, 06:38 PM)London1 Wrote: Does listening to these subs while sleeping while one ear is on a pillow affect anything?
@Shannon

Apparently not.  I have been doing it for years, as have many others.  No issues.

Shannon,

What is a good subliminal for someone whos getting married and want to focus on sexual pleasure as a priority specially in honeymoon.


DMSI would be a bad choice, right?

(08-11-2024, 07:08 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon,

What is a good subliminal for someone whos getting married and want to focus on sexual pleasure as a priority specially in honeymoon.


DMSI would be a bad choice, right?

Yes.  You want this one:

https://subliminal-shop.com/products/org...er-5-75-3g

Time Management & Priority Optimization 5.11G (Type A/B/C/D Hybrid)
https://subliminal-shop.com/products/tim...c-d-hybrid

From where I'm standing, it looks like the shop website is down.

(08-12-2024, 11:16 AM)thectexperience1 Wrote: From where I'm standing, it looks like the shop website is down.

Are you still having this issue?  I just checked, and it works fine for me.

Is it ok if I listen to OGSF v2 file which is 60 minutes two times back to back(120minutes) to make myself experience 3 consecutive 40 minute loops?
a 40 minute loop is what is instructed.

(08-12-2024, 02:35 PM)saamaanazizi Wrote: Is it ok if I listen to OGSF v2 file which is 60 minutes two times back to back(120minutes) to make myself experience 3 consecutive 40 minute loops?
a 40 minute loop is what is instructed.

Why would you want to do that?

(08-12-2024, 03:48 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-12-2024, 02:35 PM)saamaanazizi Wrote: Is it ok if I listen to OGSF v2 file which is 60 minutes two times back to back(120minutes) to make myself experience 3 consecutive 40 minute loops?
a 40 minute loop is what is instructed.

Why would you want to do that?

to run 3 loops per day instead of one. I guess this is a subconsciously order.(autoconfig I suppose)

Shannon Wrote:We have four people currently testing 6G-aplpha test, including Duke. Very interesting results so far.

Come on, man...don't do that to us...

Inquiring minds want to know...

(08-12-2024, 11:16 AM)thectexperience1 Wrote: From where I'm standing, it looks like the shop website is down.

Yeah it's good from my end again.

(08-12-2024, 06:08 PM)NOMAD Wrote:

Shannon Wrote:We have four people currently testing 6G-aplpha test, including Duke. Very interesting results so far.

Come on, man...don't do that to us...



Inquiring minds want to know...

I could tell you more if...

A) There wasn't so much risk of hype.  I want to prevent hype, so you can assess 6G as it really is, instead of compared to some insane imaginary expectation.
B) I have ongoing testing happening, and some of this information is kept classified even between testers. 

Going to emphasize the qualifiers, but here's what I can tell you so far that (hopefully) will not cause problems:

* 6G-Alpha test is reported to be smoother than 5.11.5G.
* 6G-Alpha Test seems to produce results noticeably faster than 5.11.5G, both directly and indirectly.
* 6G-Alpha Test appears to be doing things that aren't necessarily expected in it's efforts to achieve the program goals. 
* 6G-Alpha Test is reported to be a significantly different experience overall than using 5.11.xG.  

It's a good idea to emphasize the qualifiers because we are still relatively early in testing right now, so we don't have hard facts yet.  We have what we see gathering repetitions in the reporting so far but we do not have absolute certainty yet.  

I know you're excited, guys and gals, but NO HYPE and NO EXPECTATIONS.  I didn't just spend 13 years developing this to have anyone tell me it's not good enough because they worked themselves into a frenzy of ridiculous imagined outcomes that results in unreasonable or impossible expectations.  6G confidently appears so far to be significantly improved over 5.11G, but it is not, and was never intended to be, a magic wand.  Wait and see for yourself what it actually does before you decide what you think, please.

That said... I'm really enjoying how much better the build process is for 6th Gen than it was for 5.x G.  This is definitely going to allow me to build faster.  Kind of frustrated that we have to go through testing so slowly, because I'd love to build a few programs in it right now.  But safety must come first, followed by correctness.  This has to be the best I can make it with current technologies, because it has to stand for a significant amount of time.

(08-12-2024, 08:51 PM)Shannon Wrote: That said... I'm really enjoying how much better the build process is for 6th Gen than it was for 5.x G.  This is definitely going to allow me to build faster.  Kind of frustrated that we have to go through testing so slowly, because I'd love to build a few programs in it right now.

If curiosity gets the best of you and you decide to break protocol, I might be willing to test a 6G-Alpha version of US and offer a head to head comparison with the 5.11G version. I know that testers don't generally get to choose what they'll test, and that there are certain qualifications that need to be met. But again, if you choose to break protocol, I might be interested.

This post isn't a 100% guaranteed offer on my part either. I would need to know the terms. I'm not willing to overload myself into a state of vegetation or anything.