(10-05-2018, 04:27 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:14 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever.

The feminine is all about flow. If they see you and they smile its a great sign of a healthy connection.

In her eyes, if you're a worthy male, she'll feel like you'll be around forever. Its the natural way of things.

Adding in a fear of loss or a certain possessiveness just gets in the way of actually enjoying someone. The real freedom is in exploring a person without any fear or attachment to outcome.

If she finds you to be an enjoyable experience, she'll keep coming back for more. Same applies vice versa.

Edit: I do like the idea of imbuing her with confidence to approach you, that's a healthy positive mindset. I guess what I'm saying is that fear should be absent from the equation.

Maybe not fear but a logical understanding that if she do t act on her desires she’ll lose you.

Confidence is acting on your desires lol.

(10-05-2018, 04:34 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:27 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:14 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote: That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever.

The feminine is all about flow. If they see you and they smile its a great sign of a healthy connection.

In her eyes, if you're a worthy male, she'll feel like you'll be around forever. Its the natural way of things.

Adding in a fear of loss or a certain possessiveness just gets in the way of actually enjoying someone. The real freedom is in exploring a person without any fear or attachment to outcome.

If she finds you to be an enjoyable experience, she'll keep coming back for more. Same applies vice versa.

Edit: I do like the idea of imbuing her with confidence to approach you, that's a healthy positive mindset. I guess what I'm saying is that fear should be absent from the equation.

Maybe not fear but a logical understanding that if she do t act on her desires she’ll lose you.

Confidence is acting on your desires lol.

I’m talking about that thing Shannon talked about where you don’t jump off a building because you know (instead of fear) that you will die. Same principle. Confidence is good too but there does have to be a consequence to not getting with the user.

(10-04-2018, 02:41 PM)dissonance Wrote: I feel warmer and much easier to feel sensitive to heat/warmth, and sweat. Like I always say why is it so hot in here, and my family is like it's not hot at all. Can DMSI be making me feel this way 24/7?

Yes. DMSI is designed to get you to project a lot of energy, 24/7. I have used it to keep me warm without a jacket on a walk on a windy pier when it was 47F!

(10-05-2018, 04:14 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever.

The feminine is all about flow. If they see you and they smile its a great sign of a healthy connection.

In her eyes, if you're a worthy male, she'll feel like you'll be around forever. Its the natural way of things.

Adding in a fear of loss or a certain possessiveness just gets in the way of actually enjoying someone. The real freedom is in exploring a person without any fear or attachment to outcome.

If she finds you to be an enjoyable experience, she'll keep coming back for more. Same applies vice versa.

Edit: I do like the idea of imbuing her with confidence to approach you, that's a healthy positive mindset. I guess what I'm saying is that fear should be absent from the equation.

Hmm, I get you actually, I think I agree with you one letting girls be in the 'flow'.

It's all up to Shannon really and what he thinks would be best for everyone.

(10-04-2018, 03:18 PM)blth Wrote:

(10-04-2018, 07:07 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-04-2018, 07:02 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: IM going to risk NOT taking a break and seeing what happens there. if theres too much turbulence,I'll take a two or three, day break depending. I don't have the luxury of a week off of USLM,right now. will definitely be updating-keeping posts up to date. Keith.

Theoretically, there should be little to no turbulence because of the similarity of the scripts and the fact that they have virtually identical goals.

Should we finish our cycle or we should continue from where we are in USLM in the new version? For example if i am in day 5 of uslm and you release the update should i count as day 1 or day 6. I am very excited for this but i would be even more excited if you manage to get 2 subs working together

Let's call this new one USML2 for easy reference.

When it comes out, I would like you to choose between waiting 7 days without subs, or just using it right away, switching from it's cycle to the new one calculated for USLM2. This will help us do two types of testing at once.

(10-04-2018, 03:52 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: I would love to know more about whats actually IN USLM... for example I didnt even know there was
"(It is the result of the program using energy flooding." )energy flooding in USLM,much less confidence and ego balancer... none of these things or otherwise are listed technology'stuff' wise on the USLM page.
.. in the dark about it. I Know your busier than a one legged Man in an Irish Jig Contest,so even if its down the road, it shure would help to KNOW MORE of what all is included in USLM, and hav eit listed as such on the sales page.
it'd be encouraging. thats my 100,000 bucks worth. I aint playin cheap!
going on faith and trust. respectfully. Keith.

Keith, ego balancer and self confidence are (and have for a long time) been in the skeleton script...

USLM consists of a skeleton script, which acts as support for the key and primary scripts. The key and primary scripts tell the subconscious what what the goal is and to some degree, how to do it. You know what's in those.

But what exactly is in the skeleton script is not public. I have to maintain some secrets, because we seem to be breeding competitors like flies lately.

(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever. And maybe the more they come to you or even think of coming to you, the less the fear is, and maybe the more the morphine drip activates for them and their confidence builds up (Im sure Shannons done this though)

DMSI has something in it that makes you irresistibly attractive to them and urges them to act on that attraction. We don't want more fear, we want less. That fear is why they're not acting. If you add fear, we then have to enter an arms race to make one fear greater than the other, and since fear is very much like cancer in how it operates, that's a recipe for a neurotic woman who's terrified of everything.

Triggering morphine drip for them, through an aura, may not be possible. If it is, I'm not sure it's a good idea. Remember, guys... this is not just something you can use and affect others. This can be used to affect you as well. I designed it that way so we would not go too far.

(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

(10-05-2018, 04:51 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever. And maybe the more they come to you or even think of coming to you, the less the fear is, and maybe the more the morphine drip activates for them and their confidence builds up (Im sure Shannons done this though)

DMSI has something in it that makes you irresistibly attractive to them and urges them to act on that attraction. We don't want more fear, we want less. That fear is why they're not acting. If you add fear, we then have to enter an arms race to make one fear greater than the other, and since fear is very much like cancer in how it operates, that's a recipe for a neurotic woman who's terrified of everything.

Triggering morphine drip for them, through an aura, may not be possible. If it is, I'm not sure it's a good idea. Remember, guys... this is not just something you can use and affect others. This can be used to affect you as well. I designed it that way so we would not go too far.

I understand, didn't know fear would inhibit them in that way. Thanks

(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?

(10-05-2018, 05:06 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?

You're definitely not following. People are using that to shut down execution by not allowing any sex. Out of fear. When they have no real reason otherwise to do so. People who are free and clear to have sex with whomever offers. And are getting offers. Which they do not allow. Because of fear.

The idea is that you have an abundance of offers of sex and interested parties, and you decide who, when, where and how much.

But switching it to "as much sex as the user wants" does and changes nothing in this case, because the user's dominant desire is what they already have, or it wouldn't be what they already have. And in almost all cases of resistance on this point, it will be because the dominant part of them desires not to have sex, and it is dominating the will of their conscious desire to have sex. In some cases, it is even dominating their conscious awareness that they even want sex.

So no amount of alpha or beta or whatever is going to matter. What you allow of what you're being offered is what you want. And what you're being offered is an entirely different thing. The whole goal of DMSI is sex on demand.

(10-05-2018, 05:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 05:06 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?

You're definitely not following. People are using that to shut down execution by not allowing any sex. Out of fear. When they have no real reason otherwise to do so. People who are free and clear to have sex with whomever offers. And are getting offers. Which they do not allow. Because of fear.

The idea is that you have an abundance of offers of sex and interested parties, and you decide who, when, where and how much.

But switching it to "as much sex as the user wants" does and changes nothing in this case, because the user's dominant desire is what they already have, or it wouldn't be what they already have. And in almost all cases of resistance on this point, it will be because the dominant part of them desires not to have sex, and it is dominating the will of their conscious desire to have sex. In some cases, it is even dominating their conscious awareness that they even want sex.

So no amount of alpha or beta or whatever is going to matter. What you allow of what you're being offered is what you want. And what you're being offered is an entirely different thing. The whole goal of DMSI is sex on demand.

I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.

(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 05:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 05:06 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?

You're definitely not following. People are using that to shut down execution by not allowing any sex. Out of fear. When they have no real reason otherwise to do so. People who are free and clear to have sex with whomever offers. And are getting offers. Which they do not allow. Because of fear.

The idea is that you have an abundance of offers of sex and interested parties, and you decide who, when, where and how much.

But switching it to "as much sex as the user wants" does and changes nothing in this case, because the user's dominant desire is what they already have, or it wouldn't be what they already have. And in almost all cases of resistance on this point, it will be because the dominant part of them desires not to have sex, and it is dominating the will of their conscious desire to have sex. In some cases, it is even dominating their conscious awareness that they even want sex.

So no amount of alpha or beta or whatever is going to matter. What you allow of what you're being offered is what you want. And what you're being offered is an entirely different thing. The whole goal of DMSI is sex on demand.

I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.

Okay, Sarge, let's go back a bit and clarify something.

In life, whatever you are experiencing is the result of whatever your dominant desires are. And your dominant desires are often those of your subconscious, and disagree with those of your conscious. When this happens, people show up here looking for a solution.

So in that sense, your experiences have been, so far, what your dominant will has been, which is differing from your conscious desires, so it must be your subconscious desires and will.

Now, this disagreement is blocking you from getting very far, even with DMSI, although from what I have seen you report it seems DMSI is making some difference. And your issue once you have it offered isn't shutting it down, because you allow it to the best of your ability at a conscious level.

What I'm talking about is people who, if they cannot stop DMSI from executing, shut down their interest in the offers they get. They use that as a defense of last resort, refusing what executing DMSI has accomplished.

So in those cases where they execute DMSI and its instructions become their dominant will while they do, those people achieve the goals of the program because they are executing the script, but then they refuse to allow sex or escalation on what their previous execution caused and procured for them.

For example, there have been reports from people who said that they had hotties becoming interested and then they found excuses why they should reject those advances. Or they talk themselves into believing they really were not advances or interest, and ignore them. These are a refusal to ALLOW SEX. They have access to it, but they refuse to allow it.

Because, out of fear, they don't want it. And in this case, what you want and what you allow are the same thing.

Shannon, does DMSI has something in the script regarding spontaneous visualisations involving the senses, like, experience lucid experiences of women making out with me, having scenarios popping up and so on? Is it subconscious training?