Got some more ideas:
- Subtext. Verbal subtext should be that of higher value. Almost like anything that is said comes from a higher value place. Tonality I guess.
- Relate to anyone
- Bring out feelings of spontaneity and adventure in girls around you
You guys do know that I have 24 pages of additions to make. Right? 21 pages of which is stuff that I accepted for addition before I ever started working on 3.0, which is still left to implement after 3.0.
And you guys, given the chance, would give me 5,000 pages more to add.
I'm not going to be able to add what I already have for at least another 2-3 versions... and you just keep piling on the suggestions.
So what shall I do with this thread?
(02-04-2017, 12:45 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]You guys do know that I have 24 pages of additions to make. Right? 21 pages of which is stuff that I accepted for addition before I ever started working on 3.0, which is still left to implement after 3.0.
And you guys, given the chance, would give me 5,000 pages more to add.
I'm not going to be able to add what I already have for at least another 2-3 versions... and you just keep piling on the suggestions.
So what shall I do with this thread?
Well I can say I only posted my suggestions since you said this was the official thread for it and you'd take a look.
What if the major suggestions for 3.1 in the thread get priority to be added first and then you go to your list if you keep adding?
(02-04-2017, 12:45 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]You guys do know that I have 24 pages of additions to make. Right? 21 pages of which is stuff that I accepted for addition before I ever started working on 3.0, which is still left to implement after 3.0.
And you guys, given the chance, would give me 5,000 pages more to add.
I'm not going to be able to add what I already have for at least another 2-3 versions... and you just keep piling on the suggestions.
So what shall I do with this thread?
I'd assume a large percentage of these are things that are either already in the program or already on the list, so if we give suggestions, you can just pick the ones you think are stand-outs.
(02-04-2017, 04:13 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2017, 12:45 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]You guys do know that I have 24 pages of additions to make. Right? 21 pages of which is stuff that I accepted for addition before I ever started working on 3.0, which is still left to implement after 3.0.
And you guys, given the chance, would give me 5,000 pages more to add.
I'm not going to be able to add what I already have for at least another 2-3 versions... and you just keep piling on the suggestions.
So what shall I do with this thread?
I'd assume a large percentage of these are things that are either already in the program or already on the list, so if we give suggestions, you can just pick the ones you think are stand-outs.
Yeah. And for me, the only reason I'm making suggestions is I think it might help/inspire you. I can stop if you want.
In the future, it may be best if possible instead of a suggestions thread, it's a voting thread and Shannon can put some major options up for voting for priority for the following version.
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-p...#pid155020
Shannon Wrote:I am from now on going to completely ignore suggestions for additions to and improvements on DMSI. It's nothing personal, I just don't have the time or energy to read them, never mind have a chance to try to implement all this. It can take days just to craft a single statement, and one such suggestion may require 4 or 5 such statements. In the meantime, you all will have thrown a hundred or two more ideas on the pile for me to stift through and deal with.
We have too many suggestions. And not just a few, hundreds too many of them, thousands too many. I cannot deal with it, I cannot spend my time reading and sifting through and prioritizing that many, because in the end, nothing gets accomplished.
So thank you for the input - but I am done taking suggestions. From here on out we will be working from the existing 24 pages of ideas. Burning out trying to deal with too much input is not how we get the job done. Thanks for understanding.
Hi Shannon I am not asking for this specific change to be in the next version. Possibly in 6 months from now. Can you create a DMSI specifically for men ?. It could be a lighter version of SM the problem I feel is because DMSI is geared to both men and women. For men it lacks the creation of sexual masculine energy. Possibly creating a gay effect ??
(02-08-2017, 11:26 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon I am not asking for this specific change to be in the next version. Possibly in 6 months from now. Can you create a DMSI specifically for men ?. It could be a lighter version of SM the problem I feel is because DMSI is geared to both men and women. For men it lacks the creation of sexual masculine energy. Possibly creating a gay effect ??
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7535-p...#pid155279
(02-06-2017, 07:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]When I get finished building the 3.x-Final, I suspect I will never want to even think about DMSI again.
(02-08-2017, 11:26 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon I am not asking for this specific change to be in the next version. Possibly in 6 months from now. Can you create a DMSI specifically for men ?. It could be a lighter version of SM the problem I feel is because DMSI is geared to both men and women. For men it lacks the creation of sexual masculine energy. Possibly creating a gay effect ??
Trying to annoy him on purpose?
He's addressed this at least 50 times.
Sorry if i come across as sounding annoying. There is still alot of unfinished work in DMSI. I feel it was a bad idea to create a unisex sub. There really should be a seperate version one for men and one for women.
In early versions of SM which had masculinity added to it later. One user reported that gay old men were following him down the street. I have nothing against homosexuals. I just dont want homos trying to pickme up.
(02-08-2017, 11:45 AM)Blink Wrote: [ -> ] (02-08-2017, 11:26 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon I am not asking for this specific change to be in the next version. Possibly in 6 months from now. Can you create a DMSI specifically for men ?. It could be a lighter version of SM the problem I feel is because DMSI is geared to both men and women. For men it lacks the creation of sexual masculine energy. Possibly creating a gay effect ??
Trying to annoy him on purpose?
He's addressed this at least 50 times.
I think it's a great idea to have the unisex sub. Most people here are confused on how sexual energies operate anyways lol
Thor do you actually want to be taken seriously? man, that's a 2012 SEX MAGNET review. And it already had masculinity in it & it happened still.
SHANNON is NOT GOING to do it for DMSI. Just stop.