What has your experience of DMSI v5.x been so far?

[Frosted]

What do I need to change to make this work on good-looking girls?

What rating scale do you view yourself as and what rating scale do you think you're attracting?

[Theron]

What rating scale do you view yourself as and what rating scale do you think you're attracting?

I would put myself at 5-6 and the girls at 2-3

[Frosted]

What rating scale do you view yourself as and what rating scale do you think you're attracting?

I would put myself at 5-6 and the girls at 2-3

With men it's feast or famine. You're going to want to get into the upper range of attractiveness if you want to attract hot women. You're going to want to be at least 2-3 points higher for that to happen, which is likely to take significant inner work.

[Shannon]

Dweller, I'd really love to hear about what you experienced to report "Very Negative" experiences.

Was meant to put neutral, my apologies, if you can remove my vote I'll pop it in again.  Nothing to report from the DMSI end, positive results from the auric shield end. If it gets released again without FRM I'll give it another month's run but until then money magnet.

I unfortunately cannot edit the poll like that, and I would not be able to if I could because then nobody could trust the results were not tampered with.

Good to know it's not a negative.

I'm looking at making it without FRM.  Haven't decided quite yet.  What results did you get from DRS in DMSI?

[Shannon]

So, I have been using 5.1 streaming, the hybrid format of the 35-minute format (hard case), for the last 1.5 months, and this is what I am experiencing: some mild attention from good-looking girls occasionally, and I had one lay with a not-so-attractive girl. She said even before we met, she was getting wet by listening to my voice. And she also commented on how her bed smelled of me the next day, and she was late to work because she didn't want to get out of bed. This was all ego-boosting for me in hindsight, but she isn't particularly attractive, so I didn't really pay attention at that particular moment.

My issue is that I seem to be attracting the same quality of girls. Most of the matching is happening on apps, where the ratio is absolutely terrible.





For historical context, DMSI has worked for me in the past and led to my very first non-monogamy situation. It was a great situation, but even then, it was with very average-looking girls.





What do I need to change to make this work on good-looking girls?



PS: I skipped hypersonic as it's very hard to know when it's actually playing, especially in streaming mode.

Skipping Ultrasonic is asksing for failure.  The program is designed and tuned to be used in Ultrasonic.  The procedure is to use Ultrasonic first, and only switch if it doesn't work after at least a month; and then, you switch to Masked, not Hybrid, for a month and only if that doesn't work do you switch to Hybrid.  I appreciate that it's hard to know when it's playing, but this is very important.  Are you experiencing difficulty with stable play time while streaming?

Use Ultrasonic format.  If you use Hybrid, especially with it not being genuinely necessary, you may be putting the hot girls out of sync with how much energy you're projecting.  The hotter the woman, the more sensitive she will be to anything being "off" and the narrower your margin of error.

It is clear that you're executing, because of what you report.  You had sex with her, and she reported responding to your voice with arousal.  She says she didn't want to get out of bed because it smelled of you.  That means you're observing pheromonal response here, at least, and likely the effects of DMSI's aura also.  However, just as the hotter a woman gets, the more sensitive she becomes to anything being off, the less attractive a woman is, the more forgiving she will be of anything being off, in order to have any chance at all of competing with hotter girls.  It is very possible that by using Hybrid, you're overpowering it, and that puts you out of the peak of the bell curve of positive response to the hot girls, but the lower tier girls may be willing to accept that to have a shot.

You say that in the past, DMSI has worked for you but pulled average girls.  DMSI is designed to increase your perceived physical and sexual attractiveness, so it is possible that you were experiencing the effect of "being average".  These days, an "average man" who rates himself 5-6/10 is going to typically be rated by women as being 3-4 points lower because of the simp effect on social media; so a girl you see as a 5 will typically see you as a 2-3, and herself as a 7-8-9.  If DMSI is adjusting her perception up 1-4 points, then she will be rating you 3 to 7.  Since she's female, and we know well that females are never going to go after a guy who she believes is less attractive than herself, you're likely being rated a 7 when she would normally rate you a 4, which makes you at least equal to her [perception of herself (at least a 7, because simps).

How do you get hot girls?  If you're already getting +4 from DMSI, when you use it properly, then you're going to have to start making yourself more attractive somehow physically, personality wise, financially, etc. to get higher rating girls.  And to stop getting 2-3's with 5.1, you have to use it according to the instructions.

[Theron]

Skipping Ultrasonic is asking for failure.  The program is designed and tuned to be used in Ultrasonic.  The procedure is to use Ultrasonic first, and only switch if it doesn't work after at least a month; and then, you switch to Masked, not Hybrid, for a month, and only if that doesn't work do you switch to Hybrid.  I appreciate that it's hard to know when it's playing, but this is very important.  Are you experiencing difficulty with stable play time while streaming?

When I play the hybrid, I hear it stop for a few seconds and then continue. This happens throughout, although not at the same time stamp periods. seems like there is no buffering allowed. I could be wrong about that. My Wi-Fi is very stable and is close to 100mb /sec, and I can play several HD videos concurrently, so I know it's not a bandwidth issue.

 So, in the next cycle, should I start with the 20-minute ultrasonic or 35-minute ultrasonic version? What would you suggest?