11-15-2019, 01:36 AM
(11-14-2019, 07:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(11-12-2019, 03:17 PM)Hatman Wrote: I was just thinking about this yesterday. And I would say yes as I am starting to believe that the source of the initial fear is biological in nature. I have my own reasoning, but if anyone thinks otherwise feel free to share.
I believe that the source of initial fear is not biological. I believe that experiencing your fears and focusing on them again and again trains the brain to make fear a habit, which can be un-learned.
I'm not currently thinking that genetic adjustment will be helpful for dealing with fear, although who knows. Maybe it will be. Right now, I'm working on making the MHS program heal you down to the smallest parts, and the models indicate that having a statement included that points that healing at your genetic material is beneficial. That is what the first use of this technology would be.
If a certain fearful response was created by a stimulus then it was most likely also manifested on epigenetic level through methylation and acetylation. In this case affecting these areals could not even help, but it may be one of the key elements to regulate the fear to normal levels.
We have been always thinking about fear as root of everything, but there is also the other way around. For example certain imbalances, infections or other elements on body level can cause fear as symptom. Think for example on someone with diabetes and low blood sugar. He might develop fear, but in this case it would be only a symptom and removing the fear wouldn’t change anything about the blood sugar level.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.