Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

It is aimed at being similar in effect to Allo-THDOC and others, in effect a subliminal result like that of the "reset" pheromone(s). It's aimed at triggering the affected brain to decide that their previous classification of you is in error, and change it to "must **** - NOW."

#3 aims to cause them to perceive you as being their ideal sexual choice and higher value than they are in terms of status.
#4 aims to add to #3 by getting them to perceive you as being everything they want and need sexually, and in a sexual partner.
And #5, which I have not started working on, will be aimed at causing a "celebrity" level status enhancement, and causing them to see it as being "no big deal" to approach because there is already a familiarity and level of comfort present that would result from having already had amazing sex with the user, and being comfortable with approaching and initiating, regardless of the stunning nature of their status and good looks. This one is going to be very hard to pull off because it is sort of a self contradiction, but I will try.

1) So we have the TAC effect and now the Allo-THDOC effect. Can you put in the 3ß-Androstanediol effect(s) too? (I think that was the secret ingredient in the raved about and legendary A314 versions.)

One step at a time, my friend. I'm working on it.

2) I think you also mentioned that there was a classification of "must **** - NOW and FOREVER". Is that still in there?

In the wording that won the modeling runs. Maybe not exactly like that...

3) In terms of the aims being contradictory, it seems to me women (and even many people) live in an inner world of contradictions so I would expect you could pull this off.

We are certainly going to try.

4) Seems all these aims are consistent with a woman being sexually motivated. Higher value than themselves in status. Everything they want and need sexually and as a sexual partner. Familiarity. Comfort. And the celebrity status (which I'm guessing includes feelings of awe and admiration). I know logically this may appear as contradictions, but I think sex has a logic of it's own, and I think this all fits well together.

I may have to adjust some of that to be polymorphic in the future to keep it truly gender unspecified in user base, but we will take it as it comes.

Besides I don't think a woman is going to say "Hey! Wait a minute! Why do I think of this guy like my favorite celebrity yet it just feels so natural and normal?" Even if she does wonder, I think she'll be "too busy wanting to hold on to and enjoy the feelings and reinforcing those feelings to effectively maintain them". But then again, perhaps that should be added too just to be safe.

The reactions I am triggering are below the threshhold of consciousness at first, and they are not coming through the neo-cortex. The parts of the rain processing these are not capable of logic. That's why you say "sex has a logic of it's own". What you're saying is that women (and men probably are too) are in large part irrational when it comes to sex.

I haven't heard anyone suggest this(forgive me if I've missed it), but is it possible to put some sort of 'don't attract women who might become obsessed and try to kill us if we no longer want them' coding? All this stuff is awesome, but usually repeated sex leads to some sort of psychological/emotional/spiritual attachment,possibly even relationships, and women would probably see you as the 'best thing ever' if this thing is working at max potential.

Any way to weed out the crazy ones so they aren't going insane if we gotta part ways?

It is possible, but first we have to know what we need to dial back from. And it is unlikely that we can prevent it entirely. I don't want to limit the program and kill the result... I want to achieve the result and then lightly filter it.