06-24-2018, 03:02 AM
(06-24-2018, 02:48 AM)Nox Wrote:(06-23-2018, 09:24 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(06-23-2018, 09:13 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:Now the problem with your excuse, here, is that nowhere in DMSI do I tell you to be passive in seduction, stop trying to approach or seduce them, or anything along those lines. Your passivity is YOUR CHOICE, and has nothing to do with DMSI. It's designed to give you maximum freedom and diversity of choice and action. Seduce when you like, and let them come to you when you like. In other words, your excuse is, to put it simply, *****.
It's good to read that because when I was using it I got the impression that it was actively training me not to. Even with girls that serve me I usually chat to them, and on 3.2 I noticed I had zero desire to 'reach out' but they were giving me a better response, I just couldn't be bothered with that. It was similar when I went out. I'd go out and the good thing was I legitimately enjoyed sitting there and talking to my friends, where in the past i'd just go out to meet girls. But at the same time I had low desire to talk to girls most of the time on 3.2.
Guess it was some kind of fear based response. An observation is that making things more sexual can bring up more fear for me at times, like if i'm talking to them just normal for nothing I feel more comfortable. But with more of a sexual intent the fear comes up. So that would make sense.
The thing is though (let's not forget): DMSI IS supposed to get women to seduce us. So that implies we shouldn't have to do anything to get that result (especially since the "meet them halfway" programming has been removed).
There are many levels and shades of seduction. Her seducing you may involve you doing a lot of the work if she's really skilled at it.
You mean if she isn't skilled? However, the goal is still that you don't have to do anything so if she is not skilled the sub has to "tell" her what to do.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.