7 hours ago
(11 hours ago)Have at ye Wrote:(11 hours ago)samba99 Wrote: Maybe, but what if the economics balance this matter, for example suppose a program cost 600$ and that equals to 6 points
And each 100$ paid in subscription will cost you 0.8 points or lower, so with this approach, people who subscribe, will take time to accumulate points
But why wouldnt you tried to subscribe ? Does it not appeal to you or why not? My point is that subscribing is really not that attractive, thats why many people prefer not to do it
AFAIR, subscriptions were primarily intended as a way of letting people who cannot afford to splurge 500+ bucks on a program outright use them, as well as to allow people to try them out for a fair price before buying them and then asking for refunds when they're not to their liking or they hit resistance.
I personally try not to do subscriptions due to budgeting on a freelance gig - I'd rather save up and purchase a program outright because of that. This also allows me to set it up in my preferred media player in a convenient playlist - which is great especially now that I'm using two programs (OSC + the DRS v2 shield).
This.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!