Shannon's DMSI V2.5 Journal

[Shannon]

Decided to use DMSI 2.5 tonight for three loops before going out, to see how it would interact with MIR2.

Tip: Don't do that. I am seriously paying for it.

That said... my waitress tonight (was with a male friend and my GF) was so ridiculous with coming onto me, repeatedly, in front of them both, that my friend was cracking up and my girlfriend was fuming mad at her.

Had I been alone, I'm relatively sure I could have achieved the goals of the program. She was definitely trying to, regardless. I have never in my life seen a waitress try so hard to communicate that she wanted to have sex with me while she was serving me. And if it was just me, they wouldn't have been reacting that way.

Had to pick my jaw up off the floor a few times.

It seems you have very close encounters with the program. Almost achieving the program's goal yet they somehow elude you.

Do you think that if you test the program by yourself. You might get the desired results? Or is there an issue that only be resolved with 3.0?

How am I going to have sex with a responder in a situation like that? She's on the clock and I'm with a group that includes my girlfriend. Yes, I have the freedom to have sex with anyone I want, but that doesn't mean I'm going to fuck random women in front of my girlfriend for sport.

That's not the fault of DMSI. Especially since once the responder has been manifested (and this one was 100% a manifestation, as I could clearly see this happening in my modeling pings of the future for the night, and I knew it was coming even to the degree that I knew before it happened that it was going to piss off my girlfriend), I can always go back later and continue the interaction alone. She may be at work, but if she is sufficiently interested, she'll make something happen.

The program is designed to manifest people who want to have sex with the user (by far not the whole of the scripting for the manifestation sequences), but the easiest way to do that may not always be a way that allows for sex on the first encounter. Especially given that women respond best to being teased sexually, so for a man manifesting a woman, it may be more likely to result in heightened interest and sex if she does not have a way to immediately satisfy her carnal desires.

That said, I'm going to try to tweak the manifestation sequences to produce sex as quickly as possible, but that must also be balanced by what is the best way possible. Otherwise you can end up with sex happening too fast. Sex too fast? Yes, if you go too fast, it will blow up in your face. At best it will only happen once at that point. At worst, you may end up in deep trouble. "As quickly as possible" usually bypasses allowing the variables time to align for a pleasant experience.

Now, I usually go out by myself to test (I went out before GF got off work, and had great responses including mutual touching from a server I know is interested, and another couple servers were showing strong interest also) but again... location and circumstances are hampered if she is at work. Or your house is a mess. Or you have time restrictions. Or...

Logistics.

I personally don't have good logistics right now. Even if everything else had gone off without a hitch, I don't have a clean house, and that usually turns women off. Had I been alone, I could probably have gotten my server who was the manifestation to continue the interaction after she got off work, and possibly led it to more intimate things, but... did I want to wait the 30 to 45 minutes for her, outside the restaurant, while she was removed from my aura and losing interest? That's not very likely. I don't wait around like a puppy for women anymore, regardless of the chance of having sex if I do.

Logistics optimization is planned for the 3.x branch, though. Perhaps not necessarily in 3.0, but definitely in the 3.x branch.

So these "near misses" are primarily a function of the circumstances in my life these days, and logistics. They indicate that DMSI is working, but needs optimization.