Shannon's DMSI V2.2 Journal

[Shannon]

I want to suggest that scripting on sexual performance be included. It only seems fitting for a program that is using intricate and extraordinary means to achieve short and long term transformation in the interest of attracting the people we desire physically and escalating to sex—the sex should be good! It leads to more sex, which has been demonstrated to have an aura of its own on people, and positive reinforcement if your partner is satisfied.

I know this is a male-centric view and I don't know what my suggestion looks like in a gender neutral program. For men (no surprise that this is coming from me), it means being masterful at delaying orgasm no matter the stimulus for a period of time that is mutually agreeable but perhaps a minimum of 40 minutes of combined foreplay and sex. For women, maybe it means honing the ability to let loose inhibitions that prevent or delay achieving orgasms. I realize those ideas conflict: tell one group not to orgasm and help the other cum fast and hard, respectively.

So maybe gender neutral phrasing can emphasize sexual confidence, a strong mind-body connection, and the ability to be comfortable and present in one's own body during sex, along with something like maximize sexual expression.

I hope you will take this under advisement.

Scripting sexual performance is extremely challenging because of the polarity of it and because each gender has vastly different needs for being able to achieve their gender goal. Putting that scripting into the same program for both genders is not a good idea.

I have already done what I can do to enhance the sexual experience and make it as enjoyable as possible for both genders. If I think of anything further, or discover a way to put gender specific programming in the script that works well enough to please me, I'll add it in the future.