01-20-2023, 09:10 AM
(01-19-2023, 07:32 PM)Qiel Wrote:(01-19-2023, 05:06 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Response: even if I had a windfall come to me before the last day of March, which is indeed within the realm of possiblities, of course and even if OGSF wasnt on the dockette much less in the process of being built _ " I would STILL continue to run my commitment of OF. Even if I were fortunate enpugh to obtain a copy of Marverick from IML, I'd still be awhile yet,down the road before I would choose to run it.
Ive got other things to handle first and as stated before, Im in no rush to get there.
I Like others we will just have to gamble, that one day it ( Marverick) may be available again... the journey continues.....another comfort to me ,is knowing that some day BAMM will be re-built in some sort or fashion or another and I Like that idea very much, as well. Yes Marverick is a knock out of the park and then some program ,but as the Buddist would say " dont push the river"
PS: I went on to Shannon's public journal and Steve has posted a Shop Pay option, I Looked into that further, they do offer a 6 months and 12 month option for payments on big ticket items. That does make this more appealing, but its certainly something I'd have to seriously consider
A one time shot at Marverick
Purchasing a Program I do not plan on using, for quite some time
OGSF is definitely on the docket to use in the coming Month of February,regardless. I need the work, putting in on all of that for shure
These things I will think on. If I getta strong "Hit" to go for Marverck the Game Changer, between now and then so be it !!
it certainly is tempting I tell ya that.
TJC.
Yeah, there are two person that I want to see the result from Maverick, you and Catman. If you two execute that baby, then I think it'll be blast for sure.. and maybe the installment 6-12 month plan on Shop Pay also an universal code or TID for you to run Maverick, Mr. Beareaterman. Good luck TJC.
Qiel, I'd like to point out an error in your logic here. You've decided that Keith and CatMan are ready for Maverick, so they must be good candidates for "seeing if it works". No offense to either of them in regards to this, but who said these two specific individuals are ready for this particular program? In other words, you cannot make arbitrary decisions based on preconceived notions that may or may not be true, in order to decide the value of Maverick!
When someone who is ready for it runs it, you will see results like what Duke gets. When someone else runs it, you'll see either a journey to, and then success (if they were almost ready for it), or they will not achieve the goals of the program (if they were not ready for it). You can't say "Maverick doesn't work," when it's being used by someone who isn't ready for it, and they shut down over fear!
Now as to whether those two are ready for it, that's up to them to decide. I just wanted to point out this error in logic, because it will cause a lot of confusion and unnecessary problems for people.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!