@Determined: But this is common sense Determined. I don't see anything pertinent in what you're saying. Nobody's running DMSI but locking himself at home 24/7 in hope a naked girl will magickal appear on the bed.
I don't believe either of the program or the user has to be blamed. Shannon's subliminals work. Any subliminal works. You can take a random low quality subliminal on youtube, you'll see some people having results with it, and some having none. Is it the fault of the program ? Maybe, if the script wasn't very good. Is it the fault of the user ? Maybe, if he was lusting for results or self-sabotaging himself consciously.
What I am trying to say, there are so many random factors that make a program work, or make a program not working. Even how the script is made can define which users will be more likely to excute.
You know before I was into subliminals, I was using self-hypnosis tools. And I found out that I responded better with "You are X", "You do X", than "I am X", "I do X".
This is just an example but I want you to try to picture the countless of possibilities of what could make a program not working for a given random user.
I do not think either of them should be blamed. Nor the user, nor the program. Part of the self-development journey is to know yourself and know what works and what doesn't, for you.
Not everything will go as planned no matter your will or your conscious efforts, this is reality.
Want some evidence ? Sarge for example. He approached women so many times, trying to help the program working. And so ?
How well did he execute DMSI ?
Another evidence, RTBoss. In spite of making so many internal shifts within himself, why did his wife, basically exposed to his aura ALL THE TIME, didn't respond as intended ? Is it RTBoss's fault ? DMSI's fault ? Hell you don't know if it's his wife having a blockage.
It's not about responssibility, nor technology, it's about finding what works for a given user.
EDIT: Another evidence, that guy in the testimonial forum who got amazing results with AOS, but having less with DMSI - he said it himself. So, Determined according to you he's faulty.
But I think that guy simply found what works for him.
I don't believe either of the program or the user has to be blamed. Shannon's subliminals work. Any subliminal works. You can take a random low quality subliminal on youtube, you'll see some people having results with it, and some having none. Is it the fault of the program ? Maybe, if the script wasn't very good. Is it the fault of the user ? Maybe, if he was lusting for results or self-sabotaging himself consciously.
What I am trying to say, there are so many random factors that make a program work, or make a program not working. Even how the script is made can define which users will be more likely to excute.
You know before I was into subliminals, I was using self-hypnosis tools. And I found out that I responded better with "You are X", "You do X", than "I am X", "I do X".
This is just an example but I want you to try to picture the countless of possibilities of what could make a program not working for a given random user.
I do not think either of them should be blamed. Nor the user, nor the program. Part of the self-development journey is to know yourself and know what works and what doesn't, for you.
Not everything will go as planned no matter your will or your conscious efforts, this is reality.
Want some evidence ? Sarge for example. He approached women so many times, trying to help the program working. And so ?
How well did he execute DMSI ?
Another evidence, RTBoss. In spite of making so many internal shifts within himself, why did his wife, basically exposed to his aura ALL THE TIME, didn't respond as intended ? Is it RTBoss's fault ? DMSI's fault ? Hell you don't know if it's his wife having a blockage.
It's not about responssibility, nor technology, it's about finding what works for a given user.
EDIT: Another evidence, that guy in the testimonial forum who got amazing results with AOS, but having less with DMSI - he said it himself. So, Determined according to you he's faulty.
But I think that guy simply found what works for him.