08-27-2016, 02:25 PM
(08-27-2016, 02:11 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(08-27-2016, 01:50 PM)Have at ye Wrote:(08-27-2016, 01:40 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(08-09-2016, 09:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-09-2016, 09:24 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: What about putting a set percentage of energy coming from food sources to be used to power the aura?
For example, 10% of caloric intake gets used by the sub for aura generation.
Interesting idea. I'll have to see if it's feasible.
Or what about switching to non-physical energies when the user runs out of physical energy. This would be more subtle until physical source is available again, but this way the aura wouldn't disappear completely. You could also combine it with the previous suggestion.
I was actually pondering the issue lately.
I have come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as non-physical energy. It's just that to our conscious minds and senses (which, while cute, are not quite up to snuff), energy that is immaterial (as in - it cannot be seen, heard or tasted, and felt only to a limited degree depending on the person) could be misnamed as non-physical.
I believe the attached Internet meme illustrates the matter in simple terms.
https://pics.onsizzle.com/you-matter-unt...124832.png
Thing is, I'm wondering whether the subconscious mind, being what it is, somehow *knows* that there is no such thing as non-physical energy and thus would go "WTF" when told to use it.
Shannon, I'd really welcome your input here, as you're the subliminal guru.
I am not an energy expert, but it looks like the called physical energy gives a different aura than the non-physical. This might be not 100% correct to call it so, but for the simplicity (and for the reason that the wording shows a difference - as well as hunger) I will stay with the terms. You could also say the one kind of energy is generated through chemical processes within the body while the other has its source outside the body.
Yeah, I guess it boils down to what one would call it. I guess I'd call them "material sources vs. immaterial sources" or maybe "natural sources vs. supernatural sources".