DMSI in China

[Shannon]

Thanks for the feedback, Shannon!
I will definitely run 3.0.1-A since, as I understand it, it improves on the clearing aspect of 2.4 and adds healing, which is what I need a lot of. But wasn't there a bulldozing aspect to 2.5? I went with what I read in other journals reporting that 2.5 dealt with resistance better than 2.4; which is why I decided to stick with 2.5. Would 2.4 have changed anything about my interactions so far? After all, it seems like a lose-lose situation: I act proactively, and thus play into their frame. I don't play their games, and they simply delete me. Looking back, there were a couple of Taiwanese girls I used to not pay much attention to, and it didn't increase their interest at all. They just ended up complaining that I didn't give them 100% of my attention and then deleted me from all social media.

Unfortunately I am bound by contract to be in China until April. As I understand it, you have some experience with Chinese women. Did they also leave a bad impression on you?

First, I will point out to you that you are in the position you are in with women, and even Chinese women, specifically as a result of what you currently believe to be true. These beliefs lead to your responses and reactions, internally and externally, and therefore your actions, attitudes, body language, choices, etc.

2.5 has stiffer anti-resistance technology, yes. But you don't need anti-resistance technology as much as you need clearing and healing to get past these faulty and limiting beliefs, which currently shape your reality.

After all, it seems like a lose-lose situation: I act proactively, and thus play into their frame. I don't play their games, and they simply delete me. Looking back, there were a couple of Taiwanese girls I used to not pay much attention to, and it didn't increase their interest at all. They just ended up complaining that I didn't give them 100% of my attention and then deleted me from all social media.

The above is a direct result of your current faulty belief system. You are seeking to justify it by validating it using logic based on your currently existing, faulty belief system and the external results it gets you. It's a circular definition. Your beliefs create your reality, which you then use to strengthen and justify your beliefs.

2.4 would likely have disrupted this a lot more, which is why you sabotaged your use of it: fear and homeostatis.