DMSI 3.1 - The Journal

[CatMan]

1. Re-check the goal wording: I brought this up because the last known candidate for the wording was "...people of the gender I am attracted to which also want to have sex with you". And we don't know the exact goal but IF it is something that relies so much on the woman already wanting you then there can be issues when the woman changes her mind IMHO.

I was thinking about how this would actually be awesome goal-phrasing for a sniper if the phrase was worded to read:

"...people of the gender I am sexually attracted -whom I already know - and who are already interested in having sex with me."

In other words, a sniper that would constantly snipe women you are sexually attracted to (who you already have an established rapport/connection with) that also already want to have sex with you. So while it wouldn't be the main goal-phrasing for the program, there would at least be a portion of the program "outing" women in your life that you've always wanted to **** by getting them to seduce and **** you! It would be just a little extra push, because the sniper can tell that they already had fantasies about fuckin' ya anyway!

This may be a great way to utilize the LDS.

Would be defintely an interesting alternative to the current LDS and I think more likely to succeed than one for a woman you encountered at some point in your life and found her most attractive. Of course, the other snipers should work independent of the fact if she already want to sleep with you.

What if none of the girls you find sexually attractive want to have sex with you and aren't attracted? I know that feel. That statement may not work well for people in that boat.

This concerns me, but is that single post about a possible phrase the only instance of Shannon saying the program apparently may only attract women that are already attracted to you? I agree with others it'd be pointless to use the program if that was the case. I know I'd stop immediately because I don't seem to get attraction from girls I want and if I did I wouldn't need the program, so it wouldn't be useful to me anymore. As it seems none of the hot girls I know find me attractive or else I wouldn't have been rejected by them or they may have made moves or whatever. The whole point of me using this is to get girls I want that I wasn't able to get before the program. I highly doubt this is the focus of the program, only going for girls that already are attracted to you, is there a post I can be directed to for this to put this to rest?

Thanks guys!

Unfortunately Shannon has to clarify what the current statement is or at least if it is dependent on the woman be already attracted to you. Here what I wrote in RTB's thread:

It was the last known candidate for the goal statement. I brought it up because IF the current statement relies on the woman already wanting you then it could cause problems. But actually we don't know what the current statement is, just wanted to make sure it has been thought of. It is in the first Shannon's discussion journal, somewhere around page 250 I believe, but not completely sure about the page.

But, CatMan, RTB is right. You already get IOI's but it is one thing to get initial interest and another thing to bring this to the next base - to speak so. So you not succeeding in seduce her doesn't mean there are no IOI's.

Thanks Mr. Anderson for the clarification.

Well, I still doubt that it will be the case, but if it is, I see little point in continuing with the program and I'd know then I wasn't "resisting" all along like I've often suspected I wasn't. Just no interest from girls I want. Could explain Swisston's issues on it too. And also how guys who are good with women seem to do very well on it with little issue. Hmm. Still...I doubt such a phase would be in there, because only guys good with women would benefit, all others would still fail due to low or no interest existing from women. Would make it unprofitable due to refunds. So I doubt the phrasing is there.

And an IOI is very different from wanting to have sex with me. I said the girls I'm attracted to don't seem to have attraction for me or want to have sex with me. Due to rejection and friend zoning and what not, which don't seem to be behaviours females do when sexually attracted to a male, lol.

More importantly, I'm sure Shannon will clarify this and explain that kind of phrasing isn't used. I wouldn't be too worried about it.