(08-25-2016, 12:12 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Guys, I think you're thinking that I'm being some DMSI cheerleader and I believe the program is infallible. Not true -- you can ask Leonidas, we've had some extensive convos on the topic. I'm quite irritated that my d*ck isn't dripping wet and that I'm not getting crazy external results like I was on v1. BUT, I'm also trying to bring a bit of stability and perspective to the situation, given that we're using experimental technology.
So, I'm just exploring avenues, not saying that you're wrong, or that your opinion doesn't matter. Just, we're five days into a groundbreaking release, let's see it through and make good observations.
EDIT: To answer your question, I'm not using v1 because I promised to test v2.3. The temptation to go to v1 is VERY, VERY, VERY strong. But, I wanna hold to my word.
Key word, Experimental. Exactly why I decided to test 2.3!! Stick to your guns Chaos and complete the test!!
INTP-A
When you imagine something vividly... your subconscious will bring it into reality.
When you imagine something vividly... your subconscious will bring it into reality.
