06-28-2016, 06:36 PM
(06-28-2016, 06:01 PM)apollolux Wrote: I voted keep the name the same, but mainly because I'm concerned that changing the name can be construed as an easy excuse to increase the price: "hey it's a 'completely different product' cuz it has a 'totally different name' so it's gonna be more expensive!" kind of thing.
In fairness I do understand that there's potential for confusion, as even Shannon was confused for a second when reading my journal.
You guys are worried about price for no reason here. Changing the name isn't a reason to increase price. It has to have value that is generally perceived by the majority to exceed the price for it to deserve a price increase. Again, the goal is to match price to perceived value, and that perception is based on, tada, performance. Which we have not yet observed fully.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!