08-16-2015, 09:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-16-2015, 09:43 AM by AlphaRomeo.)
Hey guys,
I know this topic/question has come up in a couple of conversations on this forum before, mainly in AM related and SM related topics, but never directly and certainly I have not found any explanation or reasoning for the possible answer of this question:
What is the difference, if any, between running say AM - AM - SM - SM and AM - SM - AM - SM when it comes to the end results? Why?
Recently there has been a lot of discussion about how magnets did not give the kind of results that the user expected and guys expressing their disappointment on those programs. But this topic is not new; also earlier many commented how they "wasted time" on SM before laying solid enough foundation with AM and wished they would have run AM twice (or more) before moving to magnets. Well, I don´t understand how running SM after one AM is waste of time if you are gonna run both twice anyway (based on journals it looks like most guys needs to run SM twice anyway just like AM in order to get the results they want). If you have run SM after one AM your subconscious has absorbed worth of one run of SM (and one run of AM)duh, and it´s not gonna nullify that programming just because you move on back to AM. AM just becomes focus for a while and when you go back to SM you now have "worth of" two AM runs and one SM, and after you finish SM second round you have exactly the same amount of subliminal programming on your subconscious as if you would have run AMx2 and then SMx2. Am I missing something here? I know it can be more complicated than that (and I would love to hear some input on this), but what I don´t understand is when some guys says how they, or how the user whose journal they are commenting on, "wasted so much time" and make it sound as if it were some terrible horrible mistake to run SM after one AM.
I can understand the "wasting time" mentality if one thought that only one run of SM after solid foundation of AM (whatever times of running AM it means for that person) would be enough, but again if you are planning to run SM twice (or more) in the reasonably time frame then what does it matter if you run AM - SM - AM - SM or AM - AM - SM - SM? Again, is there a difference in the end,total results, and if yes what and why?
I know this topic/question has come up in a couple of conversations on this forum before, mainly in AM related and SM related topics, but never directly and certainly I have not found any explanation or reasoning for the possible answer of this question:
What is the difference, if any, between running say AM - AM - SM - SM and AM - SM - AM - SM when it comes to the end results? Why?
Recently there has been a lot of discussion about how magnets did not give the kind of results that the user expected and guys expressing their disappointment on those programs. But this topic is not new; also earlier many commented how they "wasted time" on SM before laying solid enough foundation with AM and wished they would have run AM twice (or more) before moving to magnets. Well, I don´t understand how running SM after one AM is waste of time if you are gonna run both twice anyway (based on journals it looks like most guys needs to run SM twice anyway just like AM in order to get the results they want). If you have run SM after one AM your subconscious has absorbed worth of one run of SM (and one run of AM)duh, and it´s not gonna nullify that programming just because you move on back to AM. AM just becomes focus for a while and when you go back to SM you now have "worth of" two AM runs and one SM, and after you finish SM second round you have exactly the same amount of subliminal programming on your subconscious as if you would have run AMx2 and then SMx2. Am I missing something here? I know it can be more complicated than that (and I would love to hear some input on this), but what I don´t understand is when some guys says how they, or how the user whose journal they are commenting on, "wasted so much time" and make it sound as if it were some terrible horrible mistake to run SM after one AM.
I can understand the "wasting time" mentality if one thought that only one run of SM after solid foundation of AM (whatever times of running AM it means for that person) would be enough, but again if you are planning to run SM twice (or more) in the reasonably time frame then what does it matter if you run AM - SM - AM - SM or AM - AM - SM - SM? Again, is there a difference in the end,total results, and if yes what and why?
GNOTHI SEAUTON - KNOW THYSELF