05-19-2020, 09:06 AM
(05-19-2020, 08:56 AM)UniversalMan Wrote:.(05-19-2020, 08:42 AM)Zubrowka Wrote:(05-19-2020, 08:37 AM)UniversalMan Wrote:(05-19-2020, 08:21 AM)Zubrowka Wrote:(05-19-2020, 07:46 AM)Shannon Wrote: We replace old versions with new versions because new versions are designed to correct known issues in old versions. Why invite more issues when you don't have to?
I would have priced it a couple price points above what you are going to price E4 at for those that maybe don't need the FRM as much but want a broader approach than E4 will have but don't want to pay the price for LTU6.
E4: 115 usd
Ltu5: 300 usd
Ltu6: 1500 usd (increased after introduction price if you going to do that again)
Did you read what Shannon wrote?
Yes I did. And I suggested a customer group that may still be interested in the product even though it doesn't work on full efficiency compared to the latest technology. They could be more willing to wait for results as another example. Shame to throw away a fully functional product where there probebly is a relevant market for it as well, where it could work as a first product to introduce people to IML as well.
I understand Shannon, aiming at perfection, cause, I am like that, If I am aware that my product haves some issues...I would not stop until fixed and once that is done...the old product with issues would no longer been available and the new would replace the old.
Yeah that isn't a bad idea. But you can grab more market shares if you have a broader market offering sometimes, if there is a market for it where customers will request the products specific function, even if it's inferior to the latest technlogy. Not everyone want (or need) an iPhone Xr or iPhone 11 - they are satisfied with the iPhone SE, becsuse it offers what they need at the right price - so apple keep selling it.
