08-30-2016, 12:29 AM
Shannon, before MSI, there were no public testing for a subliminal, and the longer single-stages took a couple of months at most (EPRHA 2.0) to come out fully fleshed out, and it appears to work like a charm for its users.
Meanwhile, it has been fully 3 months since the first MSI came out, and we're still not quite near the desired results. In fact, it would seem we're moving backwards in terms of results. Despite 3 successive revisions, V1 had the most noticeable impacts for me as well.
Perhaps it is time to re-evaluate? Did you use only models and private testing before to quickly determine if a subliminal works? Would that speed up the process? Surely future 5.5G+ subliminals will not have the long gestation we currently have with MSI? And when do you plan on finishing the 2.x series and move on to V3?
Meanwhile, it has been fully 3 months since the first MSI came out, and we're still not quite near the desired results. In fact, it would seem we're moving backwards in terms of results. Despite 3 successive revisions, V1 had the most noticeable impacts for me as well.
Perhaps it is time to re-evaluate? Did you use only models and private testing before to quickly determine if a subliminal works? Would that speed up the process? Surely future 5.5G+ subliminals will not have the long gestation we currently have with MSI? And when do you plan on finishing the 2.x series and move on to V3?