08-16-2016, 09:55 AM
(08-16-2016, 09:22 AM)Ricardo Wrote: No I understand that but women are tenacious and can be aggressive pursuers if they want the bloke enough. Believe me they will find ways of getting their man and will only fail if the man isn't interested at all. But they have to be THAT INTERESTED to begin with. They may smile or stare at you but they will
follow it up if it doesn't get results..bumping into you or something else to get your attention, even if it's days later. When you are in the line of fire you can't do anything wrong
Agreed.
Ricardo Wrote:Yes, after Shannon stated the limitations it went from being a sub that will make you irresistible, aggressively pursued and laid by hot women who you wouldn't normally get the chance to have...to a sub that is actually just going to put you in the best possible light, but don't expect to score with women who
previously didn't find you desirable.
This is actually false. Chaosvrgn is living proof that a woman who had no interest in you can be influenced to want to f*ck you. Other guys (Minititan and Kenpachi I believe) also had women (who were relatively attractive from my understanding) pretty much mount them. So the sub CAN work. The rest of this post will be addressed towards the end.
Ricardo Wrote:Strange isn't it! You might be happy to go into a grocers for cabbages and
come out with carrots but I'm not. I just don't want to see guys here promised a hurricane of lust filled craziness only to end up with a wet fart.
While Shannon may have a shed load of acronyms when he talks about his work, it doesn't mean anything until they produce the results he's saying.
Ultimately he will be judged on his products, not his claptrap.
Now based off this I will assume that you are talking specifically about the program achieving the design goal of getting attractive individuals (in our case attractive women) approaching you and initiating sex correct? Now, bear in mind what we are conducting here are TESTS. All these programs from the V1-V2 series of DMSI/AOSI are all TEST programs.
So, you are correct in that none of them have been able to consistently achieve the main design goal. My question to you is this. Does it mean absolutely nothing if Shannon gets this program to a point to where it a) allows the self-effects (which may or may not be meaningless to you) working for most individuals and b) is able to make it so that women show blatant signs of attraction (whatever your definition of blatant is) consistently shy of outright telling you "I want you to f*ck me" (at least without you opening your mouth and speaking to her and asking yourself )
Now, here's where you and I are in agreement Ricardo. I follow your grocery store analogy and I believe that if Shannon is NOT able to make the program achieve its specific design goal as it is now then I agree that he SHOULD change the goal of this program (in V3) to reflect the current capabilities of DMSI that way he doesn't have to worry about individuals like yourself complaining about the program not working even if it does everything else. And for the record, those people would NOT be in the wrong.[/quote]
As of now, I do not believe Shannon should change the design goal since the purpose of these tests is to see IF the design goal can be accomplished with current technology.