07-04-2016, 08:22 PM
(07-04-2016, 07:57 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: What I can tell is that beautiful seemed to create more and more obvious responses than the current phrasing. Hope you find the best wording soon.
I think you are mistaking peas for carrots.
What almost certainly made for much more obvious results was a physical source of energy with which to power the program. The amount of energy, and it's density, is what we are after.
So the next version of the 2.x branch will be using something along the lines of "all the best available sources of energy" that are of course safe, appropriate, etc.
We don't want hunger and we don't want exhaustion. We need to find the right balance of energy sources to achieve the results without having those things.
The goal's importance is really secondary to the source of energy because the amount and density of energy is what makes for obvious results.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!