07-01-2017, 10:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-01-2017, 10:16 PM by ResJudicata.)
Now I just feel blind for not noticing that. Then again, I'm trying to remember the last time I looked at that top bar and it's kind of small on my mobile device while also not really drawing the eye with the neutral colors with blue above.
Edit: now that I've looked at it. Could use with a table of contents or something at the top along with the ability to just straight up make it alphabetica instead of sections. If I'm looking up something like US, I don't know if it's a program or a technology when people are asking if it's added to something. I would assume it's a technology if I didn't know otherwise. Maybe this is just me complaining about something or a legitimate argument over how to organize a glossary. I expect most glossaries to be a straight alphabetica rather than the bit of a hodge podge the current glossary is.
Edit: now that I've looked at it. Could use with a table of contents or something at the top along with the ability to just straight up make it alphabetica instead of sections. If I'm looking up something like US, I don't know if it's a program or a technology when people are asking if it's added to something. I would assume it's a technology if I didn't know otherwise. Maybe this is just me complaining about something or a legitimate argument over how to organize a glossary. I expect most glossaries to be a straight alphabetica rather than the bit of a hodge podge the current glossary is.