+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 08:20 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote: hi Shannon
wanted to ask you this question while DMSI is still fresh in your memory and before you move on to something else.
in the light of what the current DMSI is doing, how do you compare it to SM3.0 in terms of technology and the objectives that are achieved?
i am already halfway 4th stage of SM30 and want to ask
1. you had made the remark that DMSI and SM3.0 is almost opposite to eachother and SM3.0 would be a better choice for permanent evolution (so to say). are your thoughts still the same on this?
2. considering i have purchased DMSI and have access to the working version, would running DMSI after SM3.0 have any adverse effects, or running SM3.0 another round still a feasible option in the light of what is in DMSI?
Obviously, 3.0 is a much lower level of technology.
Objectives achieved... well, you have to read my previous posts and compare the product description pages.
1. I have to see what 3.x does before I can comment.
2. You could do either. I would say that you should finish SM and give it some time to show itself to you after it's done... and then decide what to do.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 12-01-2016
Shannon,
I have seen that the A files are 69 minutes and the B files are 72 minutes. I'm sure the A files are supposed to be 69 minutes, but are the B files 72 minutes?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 08:34 PM)Eurasian Wrote: I would like to use the hybrid masked trickling stream track. Am a bit concerned since there is also the ultrasonic track in there. If I play it through in ear headphones, can I play it as loud as is comfortable for me or should I turn down the volume so that I can barely hear the track?
Normal calibration uses the audible tracks to calibrate the ultrasonic tracks.
We now have both in one track.
We know they are 1-2 dB louder because of additive effect, and because I did not compensate that out.
So... set the audible part of the hybrid to a comfortable level, and if you still think the ultrasonic is too loud, lower the volume until it's not. A click or two should be fine if it is needed.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 08:36 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,
I have seen that the A files are 69 minutes and the B files are 72 minutes. I'm sure the A files are supposed to be 69 minutes, but are the B files 72 minutes?
Checking against the md5 hashes will tell you the answer you crave.
But yes, they use different ASRB ratios.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - KingDavid93 - 12-01-2016
Pretty sure it's not AP code, headache is starting to fade halfway through 2nd loop while the heat remains.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016
2.4/2.5 links have disappeared and the new links for 3.0.1 are up, I am downloading as I write this to confirm!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 12-01-2016
3.0.1 links fixed.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 08:39 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: Pretty sure it's not AP code, headache is starting to fade halfway through 2nd loop while the heat remains.
Yeah, it would not be fading if it was AP code.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 12-01-2016
Okay Shannon!
I'm seeing a 15db-20db difference over here through my Sennheisers with Frequensee. The ultrasonic is registering as 15-20db louder than the masked in the hybrid trickling stream, way more than 1-2 db. I wouldn't have bothered to post if the difference was so slight, I thought there was a problem in the track. Just got concerned about such a big variance, I'll continue on.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 08:46 PM)Benjamin Wrote: 3.0.1 links fixed.
Thanks Ben.
And all was blissful again in the land of honey and rainbows and DMSI.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 12-01-2016
I was gonna suggest using WordPress's built-in rollback function to revert to a revision of the page that had the correct links, but Ben posted that he fixed it.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 08:39 PM)Shannon Wrote: Checking against the md5 hashes will tell you the answer you crave.
But yes, they use different ASRB ratios.
I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Broski - 12-01-2016
3 loops of version A down. Nothing to report yet. Everything feels/seems to be per usual but i didnt really expect anything to happen internally or externally off the bat
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 12-01-2016
(12-01-2016, 09:01 PM)Steven Wrote:Same here. Maybe Shannon can put a sticky somewhere.(12-01-2016, 08:39 PM)Shannon Wrote: Checking against the md5 hashes will tell you the answer you crave.
But yes, they use different ASRB ratios.
I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.