+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-29-2016
LOL, oh please not the "omg this will make me bang my cousins" thing again. That was insane how deep that view ran.
Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 07:32 PM)CatMan Wrote: Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.
But DMSI is trying to achieve the "Axe Commerical" effect is it not? LOL
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-29-2016
Quote:not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.
Hahaha I don't know why I laughed at this so much.
What about Stifflers mum?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Have at ye - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 07:37 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.
Hahaha I don't know why I laughed at this so much.
It's funny because it's true!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 07:35 PM)Aventus45 Wrote:(11-29-2016, 07:32 PM)CatMan Wrote: Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.
But DMSI is trying to achieve the "Axe Commerical" effect is it not? LOL
I don't know about that, but I do know you won't be "forced" to have sex with cousins, it's still your choice bottom line so there's responsibility to take. That went on and on, I can't believe people were so deeply concerned about that. Let's get it working so that girls we know or strangers aggressively pursue us for sex, before this cousin thing is a serious issue...lol...so silly to obsess over that is all.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-29-2016
Hey Shannon!
How is V3.0.1 coming along today?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 07:39 PM)CatMan Wrote:not the cousins part I meant the whole attracting women like moths to a light part.(11-29-2016, 07:35 PM)Aventus45 Wrote:(11-29-2016, 07:32 PM)CatMan Wrote: Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.
But DMSI is trying to achieve the "Axe Commerical" effect is it not? LOL
I don't know about that, but I do know you won't be "forced" to have sex with cousins, it's still your choice bottom line so there's responsibility to take. That went on and on, I can't believe people were so deeply concerned about that. Let's get it working so that girls we know or strangers aggressively pursue us for sex, before this cousin thing is a serious issue...lol...so silly to obsess over that is all.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Broski - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...
We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.
Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 08:20 PM)Broski Wrote:(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...
We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.
Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve
I think that before any "filters" are added to DMSI, it should be producing results across the board first. Only then should filters start being considered.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 11-29-2016
Make some servitors to help keep you on your a game!! =)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 08:39 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-29-2016, 08:20 PM)Broski Wrote:(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...
We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.
Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve
I think that before any "filters" are added to DMSI, it should be producing results across the board first. Only then should filters start being considered.
I'm not adding filters. You will have to accept that you are an adult, and take responsibility for whatever you choose to do.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-29-2016
For full disclosure, I was one of the original people who voiced this concern and had people coming at me accusing me of some bullshit. I really don't want to go down this road again but I'll try to keep it brief.
#1: No nerfing DMSI in any way. If relatives are trying to get at you, then you gotta handle it.
#2: Catman I'll speak ONLY for myself here. You stated the following:
Quote:I don't know about that, but I do know you won't be "forced" to have sex with cousins, it's still your choice bottom line so there's responsibility to take. That went on and on, I can't believe people were so deeply concerned about that. Let's get it working so that girls we know or strangers aggressively pursue us for sex, before this cousin thing is a serious issue...lol...so silly to obsess over that is all.
Yeah I agree man its silly to obsess over it especially since DMSI hasn't shown any true consistency over the past few months to warrant that level of concern. However, that situation went on and on because people people like me who were NOT obsessing over it... were acussed of obsessing over it and because some people assumed me and LionKing were trying to get DMSI nerfed. I simply wanted to know if such a thing could be addressed but I also was more than happy to risk having a legal-of-age cousin trying to grab my balls if it meant having some gorgoues women exchanging orgasms with me.
#3: Broski, I understand your concern but once again, see #1. I think in the grand scheme of things Maxx55 has a point. DMSI hasn't even proven it can work consistently yet. Until it does, the whole relative thing is a non-issue. But once again, I fully understand your concern man.
And just to make sure people don't (once again) misread my intentions I'm going to offer Shannon a simple Legal Disclaimer he can put on the DMSI page:
Congratulations! You've just purchased the (soon to be) most powerful attraction subliminal on the planet! By purchasing this subliminal you accept full responsibility for WHAT you get into,WHO YOU GET INTO, and who you ALLOW to GET INTO YOU (if you're female).
EDIT: Had to clean some of those sentences up.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Broski - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 08:39 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-29-2016, 08:20 PM)Broski Wrote:(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...
We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.
Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve
I think that before any "filters" are added to DMSI, it should be producing results across the board first. Only then should filters start being considered.
You may be right. I personally havent seen much in terms of results thus far so I may be getting ahead of myself
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-29-2016
Shannon, when you have the time, can you explain exactly why outliers was faulty logic? This is a forum about life and progress after all, I'd like the conversations to be more cantered around that.
Also I have a question about sub listening: let's say I'm playing 2 subs, sub A and sub B, if I listen to sub A for 6 hours, and then listen to sub B for 8 hours, which sub is going to be ingrained and executed first? Should I switch them around depending on which ones more important?
Also, I remember you once mentioned that fear of failure had some sort of significance when it came to cognition or emotion, if you remember that concept, what was it? I'd like to know more about it.