+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Narcissus - 11-07-2016
Does V 2.1 also need to be run in continuous loops so as to not disturb ASRB technology like the 2.5?
Also how many loops are needed continuously?
Also will I have to take a break of a few days if I am using 2.5?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-07-2016
Hahaha no I didn't refresh the discussion page.
We both posted that at 11:57am! Oooo ooooO
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-07-2016
Hey guys wanting to run V1, I found a post from my AOSI journal:
4-5 loops model best
EDIT: Ok, nvm, I just found a later post touting 8 loops as optimal again:
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7536-post-115973.html#pid115973 - Meh, if I read it all, it says modeling for V2, so disregard this as well and listen to Mr. Anderson, lol.
[DISREGARD]Originally, it was either 8 loops, or 2 loops. Late into the V1 run, his latest models said 4-5 loops. Also, as I read my journal, I noticed that when I broke ASRB that the results seemed to suffer.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 06:29 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Hey guys wanting to run V1, I found a post from my AOSI journal:
4-5 loops model best
EDIT: Ok, nvm, I just found a later post touting 8 loops as optimal again:
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7536-post-115973.html#pid115973
Originally, it was either 8 loops, or 2 loops. Late into the V1 run, his latest models said 4-5 loops. Also, as I read my journal, I noticed that when I broke ASRB that the results seemed to suffer.
did V1 have State shifting?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 07:28 PM)Aventus45 Wrote:(11-07-2016, 06:29 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Hey guys wanting to run V1, I found a post from my AOSI journal:
4-5 loops model best
EDIT: Ok, nvm, I just found a later post touting 8 loops as optimal again:
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7536-post-115973.html#pid115973
Originally, it was either 8 loops, or 2 loops. Late into the V1 run, his latest models said 4-5 loops. Also, as I read my journal, I noticed that when I broke ASRB that the results seemed to suffer.
did V1 have State shifting?
Yes.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 05:10 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: How hard would V1 clash with E2 if im planning on running DMSI for one night?
It would not exactly be a good thing. Give yourself some days off if you're going to switch to E2. Good idea to take some days off to switch to V1, also. 5 to 7 is a good idea, since P4 will have it running in your head at least 3 days after you stop listening.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 05:16 PM)Narcissus Wrote: Does V 2.1 also need to be run in continuous loops so as to not disturb ASRB technology like the 2.5?
Also how many loops are needed continuously?
Also will I have to take a break of a few days if I am using 2.5?
Yes.
Don't remember number of loops. I don't exactly worry about keeping track of old technology specs.
Yes.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 11-07-2016
You missed this one Shannon. Please answer when you have the time
(11-07-2016, 04:09 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, I have a question about volume for DMSI.
If I listen at a certain volume with the masked track and get a headache while listening (but the volume is comfortable for my ears), but I can lower the volume and not get the headache, which is better? Persisting through the headache at a comfortable volume or lowering it so I don't get a headache?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 08:36 PM)maxx55 Wrote: You missed this one Shannon. Please answer when you have the time
(11-07-2016, 04:09 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, I have a question about volume for DMSI.
If I listen at a certain volume with the masked track and get a headache while listening (but the volume is comfortable for my ears), but I can lower the volume and not get the headache, which is better? Persisting through the headache at a comfortable volume or lowering it so I don't get a headache?
If you lower the volume, is the headache replaced with the morphine drip? (Pleasurable experience?) If it is, that means you've gone from resisting to executing.
If you lower the volume and it does not... the resistance is gone, but you may not be executing.
Beyond that, I don't have enough information on the sub to tell you what's a better option.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 06:29 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Hey guys wanting to run V1, I found a post from my AOSI journal:
4-5 loops model best
EDIT: Ok, nvm, I just found a later post touting 8 loops as optimal again:
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7536-post-115973.html#pid115973
Originally, it was either 8 loops, or 2 loops. Late into the V1 run, his latest models said 4-5 loops. Also, as I read my journal, I noticed that when I broke ASRB that the results seemed to suffer.
It was 2 loops for short term usage, as long Shannon though it could work along with other subs. Normal usage was 8 loops at the beginning. But looks like 4-5 is the latest info.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hunk - 11-08-2016
Hey Ben...
I'm not able to download the FLAC zip file. I'm getting the same XML error the others have mentioned. Would you please fix it when you see this?
Also, would you please reset my download count as well, as I think I used all my 5 attempts while repeatedly trying to download this file.
Thanks very much.
Code:
Filename: Develop Maximum Sexual Irresistibility Ver. 2.5 (5.5g - Type A/B/D Hybrid - Test Release) – Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_5_5G_Subliminal_FLAC.zipAnd the error I get is as follows:
Code:
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<Error>
<Code>NoSuchKey</Code>
<Message>The specified key does not exist.</Message>
<Key>
d/Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_5_5G/Develop_An_Aur
</Key>
:snip
</Error>RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-08-2016
Ok fixed. Thanks.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hunk - 11-08-2016
(11-08-2016, 02:03 AM)Benjamin Wrote: Ok fixed. Thanks.
Downloading now! Thank you.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hunk - 11-08-2016
(11-07-2016, 02:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-07-2016, 12:55 PM)hunk Wrote:(11-07-2016, 12:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5.
Ben, please link V1 as an add on to the downloads for V2.5, so that people can download either or both if they like.
Hi Shannon,
Since we're requesting Ben to make the old version of dmsi available, do you think it'll be possible to have/buy the single stage version of BASE please? (the one which was made available for a limited time)
Alright, Ben, if you would do the honors and temporarily enable the older single stage version of BASE...
This will be temporary, and anyone who misses it, misses it.
Thank you. Much appreciated.