(09-04-2016, 11:54 AM)Big Boss Wrote: Guys who are going to test 2.4 are so lucky. I'm at this beachfront restaurant and it would be an ideal place to run it

(09-04-2016, 11:48 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 03:44 AM)Ricardo Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 12:14 AM)AriGold Wrote:

(09-03-2016, 11:48 PM)dissonance Wrote: SO! What are the new additions and changes and tweaks from 2.3 to 2.4?

I think you forgot to specify that the answer should be in a language we all understand.

Agreed but at the end of the day I'm only interested in results not rhetoric. So far the sub is unimpressive at best and it'll be something if 2.4 can even get close to the specified goals.
I'm not giving up on the the sub but lets be realistic, the goals have got to be brought into line with reality now. They are currently way out of Shannon's league as we've seen.

At the end of the day, Ricardo, there are some very good reasons why I am the one creating these and you're sitting in that arm chair taking pot shots at me. The first of which is, I can see beyond what is to what can be, and how to get there. I also understand that getting from point A to point Z means we have to go through points b through Y first, and they're all going to be steps to point Z, and not point Z itself.

I think you just like to hear yourself criticize, because we have already been over how valuable non-constructive criticism is. It's a damned good thing for all of us that I base my knowledge of what I am capable of on my own experience and knowledge instead of yours!

(09-04-2016, 12:29 PM)Shannon Wrote: Well I knew this was coming, and it's only the beginning. The more I accomplish, the more visible I become, and the more visible I become, the more polarized the responses will be. There's a lot more criticism than just Ricardo's coming. But that's okay, because I know what's what. And in the end, it will all just serve to prove the truth that there is no such thing as negative publicity.

Just wait, though. Give it a year or two and you're going to see me getting attacked like crazy for daring to do what I am doing. And the more I succeed, the harder they'll attack!

(09-04-2016, 11:49 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 06:00 AM)maxx55 Wrote: I remember Shannon said that the 2.3 goal statement won out of the models he ran.
But it seems like 2.4 will have a new or at least a modified statement.

Once the sub is completely finished, will it be aimed at hitting as many girls as possible or just aimed at the ones I particularly find attractive? If it's the latter, I may buy it before final release so I can have one aimed at hitting as many as possible.

The end goal is a sub that snipes the people you are genuinely interested in, and ignores the rest.

(09-04-2016, 12:37 PM)Have at ye Wrote: Hi guise and Shannon,

Is there a suggested number of loops estimate for DMSI 2.4?

(09-04-2016, 12:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 12:37 PM)Have at ye Wrote: Hi guise and Shannon,

Is there a suggested number of loops estimate for DMSI 2.4?

Not yet. I'm not sure I am going to make such a suggestion this time, since not a whole lot of people ever follow the instructions on that. But will see what the models say in a little while.

(09-04-2016, 12:54 PM)maxx55 Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 11:49 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 06:00 AM)maxx55 Wrote: I remember Shannon said that the 2.3 goal statement won out of the models he ran.
But it seems like 2.4 will have a new or at least a modified statement.

Once the sub is completely finished, will it be aimed at hitting as many girls as possible or just aimed at the ones I particularly find attractive? If it's the latter, I may buy it before final release so I can have one aimed at hitting as many as possible.

The end goal is a sub that snipes the people you are genuinely interested in, and ignores the rest.

Not to be nitpicky, but just for clarity, with that being the goal for the final DMSI, what would happen in these situations:

1. I see a hot girl and know I want her.
2. I see a girl that I want to know better. I'm attracted, but not "bang now"
3. I see a girl and just like her face or particular body parts
4. I know a girl. I like her as a person, she's cool and I want her

Is the final aura intended to hit all four of them?

(09-04-2016, 01:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 12:54 PM)maxx55 Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 11:49 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-04-2016, 06:00 AM)maxx55 Wrote: I remember Shannon said that the 2.3 goal statement won out of the models he ran.
But it seems like 2.4 will have a new or at least a modified statement.

Once the sub is completely finished, will it be aimed at hitting as many girls as possible or just aimed at the ones I particularly find attractive? If it's the latter, I may buy it before final release so I can have one aimed at hitting as many as possible.

The end goal is a sub that snipes the people you are genuinely interested in, and ignores the rest.

Not to be nitpicky, but just for clarity, with that being the goal for the final DMSI, what would happen in these situations:

1. I see a hot girl and know I want her.
2. I see a girl that I want to know better. I'm attracted, but not "bang now"
3. I see a girl and just like her face or particular body parts
4. I know a girl. I like her as a person, she's cool and I want her

Is the final aura intended to hit all four of them?

Ultimately, what I want it to do is be polymorphic and self adjusting. When you encounter a person you are attracted to, it is (if I can make this work) going to cause her to respond according to how much she is attractive to you, with the standard DMSI power levels as baseline regardless of how attracted you are.

So I'm not turning off the aura, I'm planning to cause it to hit everyone, but it will focus on those you are interested in and do so to whatever degree they are interesting to you.

That's the idea right now. End result: The more you want it, the more you get it.

So 100 people who are average might respond to the base aura with IOIs, but that 10 is going to get power slammed with your auric awesomeness and be unable to resist. In other words, better to snipe the ones you want, than have 100 people giving minor IOIs and you really don't care.

That's the goal.