(08-19-2016, 10:32 AM)maxx55 Wrote:

(08-19-2016, 08:46 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: There is two things I dislike about DMSI. It's the goal phrasing for getting sex & the gender neutral thing ( towards every person of the gender I am attracted to thing ).

The original Aura Of Sexiness could already be used by anybody of any sexual orientation. It was already gender neutral. It said on the website : " This title can be used by either gender, and can be used successfully by anyone of any sexual orientation. " AOS was already gender neutral. No need to make it gender neutral, the thing is gender neutral already. I think it makes the sub less effective cause The original AOS was effective as **** without it. You can check the testimonial section for testimonials of AOS.

Next is the goal phrasing. You can get the sex indirectly by working on the aura. Remember how frenchmagnet got sex with 70% of the beautiful women he knew in a group. The goal phrasing should be about building the hottest, sexiest & most alluring aura of irresistible sexiness possible not on getting sex. I think focusing on trying to get sex, makes it less effective. Anyways thats my 2 cent. What do you guys think.

If at any point Shannon thinks a focus on the aura would yield better and more blatant results then by all means he should change the goal of the program and start over again.

I just think 2.3 and 2.4 will probably show whether the goal has the right aim or not.

(08-19-2016, 11:03 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ ... ]that logic cookie. Mmmmm, that sh*t tastes good, don't it?

(08-19-2016, 12:05 PM)apollolux Wrote:

(08-19-2016, 11:03 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ ... ]that logic cookie. Mmmmm, that sh*t tastes good, don't it?

DAT SALT THO.

(08-19-2016, 11:07 AM)RTBoss Wrote:

(08-19-2016, 11:03 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: You're right. I'm not a "valid tester."

Thanks.

(08-19-2016, 12:52 PM)K-Train Wrote: Chaosvrgn you were making good points bruh, even without the "logic cookie" stuff and the "nagging wife" thing. RTBoss, you're right, Chaosvrgn isn't a valid tester but then again...neither is Shannon because Shannon has continued to use BAMM 2.0 all this time.

Now I will say that from a scientific standpoint the results of a "valid tester" will be favored over that of an "invalid tester" such as Chaosvrgn and Shannon however both individuals got results and their data is useful either way.

Come on guys, let's not tear each other apart here unnecessarily. Chaosvrgn I know you only have two gears, 0 and 100, but...can you make a 99? Please?

(08-19-2016, 01:07 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: However, when you tell me that I don't have the right to speak because I'm not part of some special class, you're going to get my fist down your throat.

(08-19-2016, 10:36 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: As a hardcore introvert, sometimes I just wanna go out and feel invisible and do my thing. v1 won't allow that. At all.

(08-19-2016, 01:07 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: So v2.3 coming out sometime today ya?!!

Chaosvrgn Wrote:Not in this situation. Here's why:

I understand why Shannon developed the concept of a "valid tester" (which, mind you, didn't exist when were all running v1). I was a professional marketing analyst for ten years -- analytics and the scientific method was my life. So, if Shannon comes along and says: "chaos, I cannot include your data in the aggregate because the results are tainted," I'll perfectly understand.

That's not what happened here. THIS is what happened:

RTBoss: v1 wasn't THAT good.
chaosvrgn: I disagree, I thought it was great. And it was very effective.
RTBoss: You don't even have the right to voice your opinion because you aren't classified as a valid tester. Your experiences are irrelevant. They mean nothing.
chaosvrgn: Um. Well, even if I'm not "valid" -- as if that makes my experiences untrue -- the journals support my statement.
RTBoss: VALID TESTER! I'M A VALID TESTER!!!!
chaosvrgn: Your testing status doesn't... change the facts...
RTBoss: LOOK AT MY VALID TESTER BADGE! You will never get this, you will never get this, LALALALA!!!!

I'm cool with Shannon not being able to use my experiences in the same manner as the valid testers. And RTBoss could've simply said: "People, take note -- chaos' results are tainted," I would've agreed and linked to my journal when I stated that over and over.

However, when you tell me that I don't have the right to speak because I'm not part of some special class, you're going to get my fist down your throat.

(08-19-2016, 10:04 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Theoretically, a "Natural Seduction for Everyone," would lack these extra instructions and would rely completely on the autopilot and state-shifting tech. As we've seen with v2.1 and v2.2, the autopilot tech doesn't seem to be kicking in for inexperienced men -- hence the whole, "I don't know what to do with these IOIs" issue.

(08-19-2016, 01:24 PM)Sickologist Wrote: @ K-Train, it's already been lurking beneath the surface for some time. It won't end here either, which s a good thing.