Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 04:01 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: If I do weed will it help EPHRA 2.0? Sort of like how Darth used MDMA to enhance E2? I don't really like weed, but if it gave me an edge I would be open to trying it with E2.

My apologies if talking about drugs is against the rules.

No. weed will not help you with E2. It will, in fact, have the reverse effect.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 04:03 PM)DisneylandUSA Wrote:
(07-06-2016, 03:55 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote:
(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to
But what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them?

Finding someone visually appealing is a long way off wanting to have sex with them for me. I would need to meet them first... which probably isn't going to happen if the aura doesn't attract them.

On top of that, for those of us in a relationship, it pretty much rules out everyone! Isn't it basically an off switch as soon as you are 'committed'? I am not 'willing to have sex with' most women I find highly desirable because that would upset my other half. I might secretly want to, but that's different. And I might be persuaded under the right circumstances! Smile

I would just remove the phrase 'I am willing to have sex with' and maybe the word 'sexually' too Smile

Good old Swisston, always the contrarian. Wink

Willing to have sex with, and want to, or ready to, or going to, not the same thing.

But, I would say that the goals of this program conflict with what you want. So unless I find a way to override your fears and resultant resistance, and cause you to act on opportunities that result regardless of your LTR, you are likely to get nowhere because you won't allow yourself to execute the script because it's goal directly conflicts with yours!

I personally don't think it will ever be possible for me to please all of you.

If I try to please those of you who are single, then those of you who are involved will be unhappy. If I try to do the reverse, then the unhappiness inverts with it.

I am aiming this at pleasing the majority.

If we attract everyone of the gender you are attracted to, the models show an almost neutral response from the user base. On a scale of -10 to +10, it rated a +1. This is likely because there is so much energy going out that results are not great, and lots of undesired people are responding.

I have modeled your suggestions, and several variants, and this is what I find.

Your original suggestion rates a +5 in the model on the aforementioned scale. I will not accept anything less than +8.

Secondary suggestion rates +3.

I took the liberty of exploring various other wordings, and found one that rates +9, equal to the one I already mentioned. This one has been accepted for consideration:

Quote:all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them

I kind of like the 'willing to have sex with' script :Tongue

Sadly, what you like and what works are not always the same thing. I am frequently surprised by the models in that regard. I come up with what I think is the perfect wording, and they consistently pick something that seems like nothing special to me. But when I test it, my preferred one does what the models said it would and fails, and the one the models picked succeeds. So it sucks to be us.

I have two options that rate high enough now. Still looking. The final that gets used will be the one that rates highest in a comparison of all of the finalists.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 04:16 PM)Boozy32 Wrote:
(07-06-2016, 04:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-06-2016, 05:36 AM)Boozy32 Wrote: Hey shannon,
I am using US and Luck Mag. I use US during the night. It's been a week now. I started dreaming bad dreams during the night. Breathing diff according to my gf. Ones I dreamed that I killed someone badly. And the other night I dreamed that I got killed by my sis. Anyway today I dreamed something bad too I just can't remember it as my gf woke me up for breathing diff and screaming. After that I immediately dreamed being so lucky and someone got me a new car. Is the bad dreams normal? Can't be avoided? What should I expect?

Also regarding the exposure. I use US during the night for 6hrs and Luck Mag during the day for 6hrs. Is this a correct way? One last thing, I feel my head is so heavy it's kinda headache. Is that because of me over listening? Should I take a break? I believe that am not getting enough exposure from Luck Mag as I try to listen to it during the day for at least 4 hours

Obviously there is something you are afraid of in either being successful or being "lucky". Bad dreams usually result when there is fear of or conflict with the goal of the program or stage you are doing.

6 hours each, one during the night and one during the day sounds reasonable. Just make sure they have equal amounts of time between each (6 hours, in this case). 6 hours US, 6 hours nothing, 6 hours LM, 6 hours nothing.

If you're feeling heavy an getting a headache, that can be be because of resistance, overvoluming, or overlistening. I would say overvolume and resistance sound like the most likely explanations to me.

Sorry for asking so much. What would be a good volume? Also is the accelerate in breathing safe?

A good volume is the volume at which you calibrate it by following the instructions for calibrating it. Smile

Accelerated breathing is simply a sign of stress and fear.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-06-2016

I just seen this potential scripting.

Quote:all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them

I can't say that makes sense to me, cos then it would point to people who already want to have sex with you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 07-06-2016

all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them

I like that option better , because you can always ask for the age of the consenting person.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 07-06-2016

Hi Shannon,

I like this line for DMSI/AOSI/DAOSI/CNN/HUGDIHX/WHATEVER

"all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them", rather than the age limiter statement if I had to choose between them even though I think a lot of wording in it is unnecessary. Many countries have different age consent laws, and under different situations, so it's unlikely people would somehow inherently know what age a person is and somehow know what age is legal or not in whatever country they're in and what circumstances. I'd rather not have a lawyer in my head. Seems like it would just inhibit performance and complicate it's process, like maybe if a girl looks younger than she is etc., similar to how the earlier sexual orientation limiters did. I'd really prefer not having a minefield like age limiting in the sub, that could ruin it for someone like me who travels a lot and countries have vastly different laws. Please don't put something like that in there. Let's get the sub to the point of actually working as advertised, before we nerf it down with conditions before it starts to work. Makes sense to me.

But on this statement, another thing I didn't understand, is how would it work? If attractive women are out there and don't seem to be sexually interested now, then how can the sub work? Isn't it supposed to work by US wanting THEM, then the sub works it's magic? So making the other person the catalyst, I'm not sure how that would work. If unattractive girls are coming onto me and instigating because of this statement, because they're the catalyst now rather than me, that isn't desirable. I have to be attracted first, for anything further to matter. So, something like: "all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to", isn't that enough? Seems obvious enough to me, I don't have much interest in little girls, nor do I have much interest in grannies. But, from 16ish up, to maybe 35ish or so, I'm good. That's more than legal here, so nobody hate. I think most people don't really need such age limiters to tell them what they should be attracted to, people already know what they're attracted to.

Anyway, looking forward to 2.2. Like the rest of the forum, lol. I might make the switch to 2.2, and finally announce the superfight of DMSI V2.2 vs. CatMan, for the V Card Heavyweight Championship Title, Live on HBO.

"Heayweight Champion Of The WWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRLLLLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!"


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 05:01 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I just seen this potential scripting.

Quote:all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them

I can't say that makes sense to me, cos then it would point to people who already want to have sex with you.

That's the point , so those people make themselves more obviously known. Some people may want to have sex with you but may pretend to not want it , because of insecurities , guilt , shame and fear. The sub will expose these people and will facilitate sex with the user. It's all about using your subconscious for faster sex. No?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 05:08 PM)Womanizer Wrote:
(07-06-2016, 05:01 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I just seen this potential scripting.

Quote:all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them

I can't say that makes sense to me, cos then it would point to people who already want to have sex with you.

That's the point , so those people make themselves more obviously known. Some people may want to have sex with you but may pretend to not want it , because of insecurities , guilt , shame and fear. The sub will expose these people and will facilitate sex with the user. It's all about using your subconscious for faster sex. No?

No. It takes too much power away from the user. Any time you take responsibility out of your hands in life shit gets ugly.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 05:07 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon,

I like this line for DMSI/AOSI/DAOSI/CNN/HUGDIHX/WHATEVER

"all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them", rather than the age limiter statement if I had to choose between them even though I think a lot of wording in it is unnecessary. Many countries have different age consent laws, and under different situations, so it's unlikely people would somehow inherently know what age a person is and somehow know what age is legal or not in whatever country they're in and what circumstances. I'd rather not have a lawyer in my head. Seems like it would just inhibit performance and complicate it's process, like maybe if a girl looks younger than she is etc., similar to how the earlier sexual orientation limiters did. I'd really prefer not having a minefield like age limiting in the sub, that could ruin it for someone like me who travels a lot and countries have vastly different laws. Please don't put something like that in there. Let's get the sub to the point of actually working as advertised, before we nerf it down with conditions before it starts to work. Makes sense to me.

I thought this too when I read the statement. Can you elaborate on exactly what it means Shannon? And will we know the statement you end up going with when you build 2.2?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-06-2016

And the legal age thing, half the time it's really hard to tell age and somehow, probably due to fear I assume "oh they may be too young". If you have no idea how old they are is it just going to filter them out because of that. Cos in reality they may not be.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 07-06-2016

Shannon can you put a script in regards to controlling ejaculation into dmsi 2.2. I mean if this is a sex sub this would help us premature ejaculators out there. Dang it i have yet to commit to using the premature ejaculation 5g sub. I'm always thinking you might do a 5.5 version of it so i hold off on it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-06-2016

Shannon,

Regarding:

"all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them"

In some form or another, I think I'm with Ben on this one...

If a person is "plain" looking, poorly dressed, and socially nervous, there will be likely be a smaller pool of possibilities for such a user of the program.

On the other hand:

"all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to"

might be a larger pool of more desirable possibilities.

Now if the program was oriented to have "all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to want to seduce me into having sex with them"...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 07-06-2016

It's kind of like that statement presupposes it will only work on people who already wanted to have sex with you before you used the program as opposed to finding new people who want to. And like Steven said that would severely limit it if you're someone who doesn't have alot of people who already want to have sex with you. That's what that sentence communicates to me anyway.

I like ""all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to"" better.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 05:34 PM)Benjamin Wrote: And the legal age thing, half the time it's really hard to tell age and somehow, probably due to fear I assume "oh they may be too young". If you have no idea how old they are is it just going to filter them out because of that. Cos in reality they may not be.

When I was 18 I had this milf who was a friends mom , who asked for my age but she didn't believe me when I said I was 18. So she asked me to prove it by me showing my ID to her. So I did I ended up hooking up with her , and the girls I brought with me I (pawned) her to her son pua term here , for better lack of word. So you can just ask for an ID. Plus it's a great conversation starter, hey I find you cute are you 18? Simple and cut through the bs.