+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-24-2016
(05-24-2016, 07:14 AM)heavysm Wrote: The main selling point for me is that the things don't need to be replaced after X amount of time. The creator also offers healing sessions and other stuff but these little stones last forever. So her primary income is made from client consultations rather than from the rejuvenizers.
If the price had been 4 figures then i might have been prevented from trying them out, as I have come across mega expensive healing gadgets in the past that were sold by some pretty unscrupulous parties. Thankfully that wasn't the case here.
That is another strong selling point for these items, you buy it once and you don't ever have to a buy another one. Plus, the prices are very reasonably priced and not overly expensive either. Yes, I like that her main source of income is from the client consultations and not from the rejuvenizers. Which shows that the products will be better made and last longer.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-24-2016
I wonder if AM7 will follow AM6's progression of having sime type if SM-like attraction built in. It seems like a lot if the "alpha-ness" talks lately have been geared entirely toward internal development without the need for externals. Not saying that external is being implied as unimportant, just that it hasnt been a focus.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-24-2016
At the moment, that's the plan.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 05-24-2016
(05-24-2016, 03:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have also decided that I am going to be making the next AOS to include the BIABWS
Hooray! I am seriously stoked for this one.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-24-2016
I am seriously stoked for the possibility of making a 5.5G skeleton script.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 05-24-2016
(05-24-2016, 03:35 PM)Shannon Wrote: I am seriously stoked for the possibility of making a 5.5G skeleton script.
WHOA didn't even catch that part somehow. AWESOME!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 05-24-2016
holy hell!
Shannon will the manifestation part of the script include something similar or along the lines of this:
"The beautiful women I attract now effortlessly approach me and act on their interest and attraction in obvious, aggressive and direct ways."
That was in BIATBW but wasn't included in the BIATBWS's script last time I checked, just thought I'd mention this.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 05-24-2016
Interesting, AOS with BIABW and possibly in 5.5g. That makes my decision between it and E2 harder.
Though i'm turned off by the 'gender neutral' thing.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 05-24-2016
I'm also not a fan of AOS+BIABWS 5.5G being "gender neutral" since that might dilute its efficacy over something more direct.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-24-2016
(05-24-2016, 04:16 PM)yeah! Wrote: Will the new AM have age limiters if it has seduction removed?
Also if BIATWS is in new AOS willthat mean it woll be men only sub?
There is no seduction in AM. It has an SM lead in, but not focused on seduction. The age limiters are there because boys don't need adult alpha male programming. They will stay, and be much improved.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-24-2016
(05-24-2016, 04:49 PM)dweller94 Wrote: holy hell!
Shannon will the manifestation part of the script include something similar or along the lines of this:
"The beautiful women I attract now effortlessly approach me and act on their interest and attraction in obvious, aggressive and direct ways."
That was in BIATBW but wasn't included in the BIATBWS's script last time I checked, just thought I'd mention this.
Mebbe. We shall see. I'm working on the OE section right now. Haven't gotten that far.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-24-2016
(05-24-2016, 05:45 PM)apollolux Wrote: I'm also not a fan of AOS+BIABWS 5.5G being "gender neutral" since that might dilute its efficacy over something more direct.
Yeah, because you aren't smart enough to know the difference, right? lol
Let's see how hard this really is.
Gender specific version:
Quote:I now make myself irresistibly attractive sexually to beautiful women.Gender neutral version:
Quote:I now make myself irresistibly attractive sexually to beautiful people of the gender I am sexually attracted to.
They mean and say exactly the same thing, except that doing a gender specific version takes 2-3 times more time. Gender neutral works for any gender and any sexual preference in just one program.
Oh ye of little faith. Or in this case, common sense. When are you guys going to figure out that yes, I actually do know what I'm doing?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 05-24-2016
(05-24-2016, 05:48 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-24-2016, 04:49 PM)dweller94 Wrote: holy hell!
Shannon will the manifestation part of the script include something similar or along the lines of this:
"The beautiful women I attract now effortlessly approach me and act on their interest and attraction in obvious, aggressive and direct ways."
That was in BIATBW but wasn't included in the BIATBWS's script last time I checked, just thought I'd mention this.
Mebbe. We shall see. I'm working on the OE section right now. Haven't gotten that far.
Awesome, truly appreciate your work!
Reason behind me mentioning this is during my BIATBW 4G run for like two weeks after 1 week I got very strong/direct responses in a short space of time and I'm certain it was that piece of the script working its magic.
I was wondering, how will this program deal with resistance e.g. shame/guilt/fear. I'm guessing it will be less of a problem/issue when in comparison to a program that contains much more goals like the larger 5G Subs. Would you say due to this containing fewer goals it won't require a module to address shame/guilt/fear based resistance?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 05-24-2016
All of you guys scared of being sexy and irresistible to gay men obviously have never benefited from a man who has been hella attracted to you but friend zoned. I'm not super into manipulation, but think for a second of all of the free stuff girls get from guys they friend zone, and then imagine that from established men. They might hit on you, but how is that different than women hitting on you that you have zero interest in? I've had more issues with women getting crazy when I wasn't interested in them than gay men.