12-31-2018, 10:37 AM
(12-31-2018, 09:03 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, I see that you say 3.4 will be final and anything beyond that will have to be paid in addition for. Just a few questions when you get a chance to answer.
1. Will DMSI 4.0 be more effective than 3.4 if you use 3.4 and it’s not working? Could 4.0 work when 3.4 doesn’t? I’m guessing that’s not the case but want to be sure.
I don't know if there will be a v4, but if there is, why wouldn't it be? This question makes no sense, since every release of DMSI has been a significant improvement in effectiveness, and v4 > v3.x. If 3.4 doesn't work, yes, 4.0 may very well. But I haven't decided what to do that far out yet. Right now I might wait to build 3.4 in 6G or I might build it in 5.5G and then 4.0 in 6G. I don't know where you get some of your ideas, they don't make sense to me.
Quote:2. If that is the case, when someone uses 3.4 and it doesn’t work, then what are their options? Both in achieving the goal the program is designed to achieve and with potential refunds or being able to upgrade to 4.0
You are assuming it won't work, and I haven't even started building it yet. But realistically, is it reasonable for me to build 8 versions of the program that you pay for once and then give you a refund if you choose not to execute it?
When the time comes and we see what 3.4 does, I will look at what is what and decide what to do for those who are still not executing. For the time being, it does not seem reasonable to me that you would get to pay once, get 7 versions for free, and then get a refund.
Quote:3. This isn’t as important of a question, but comparing how effective you want 6G to be, to the tech in DMSI 3.3, how much of a difference is there currently?
Thanks in advance
6G is going to be a significant step up from where DMSI 3.3 is, we have a number of things to decipher, build and add before we get there.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!