12-28-2018, 08:28 PM
(12-17-2018, 01:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-17-2018, 01:50 PM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:(12-17-2018, 10:45 AM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:(12-17-2018, 10:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-16-2018, 10:56 PM)robstar Wrote: Hey Shannon. I know you've stated long range sniper is not in 3.3, which is disappointing. However if one was to potentially use conscious visualisation based sexual energy remote seduction/manifestation towards specific women, would the dmsi aura and energy possibly aid that?
If it will aid in doing that, it's already happening. And if not, no, it will not. The person to be affected must match the targeting pattern.
And I'll say it again, for the millionth time, targeting specific people is a bad move.
Then why on 3.2 I became obsessed over this girl E? And when she passively rejected me, the pain was only on 3.2 and it wouldn't leave me (my journal has it all). But when I was on MLS, I barely thought about her.
Now, on 3.3 a girl from my gym is on my mind. Then what should I do if I can't target her specifically?
Shannon, this is from DMSI description page: "be aware that it is designed to get you to sexually seduce everyone you want to have sex with."
And you are saying targeting specific people is a bad move. Don't you think these two are conflicting? If not, why?
Quote:Then why on 3.2 I became obsessed over this girl E? And when she passively rejected me, the pain was only on 3.2 and it wouldn't leave me (my journal has it all). But when I was on MLS, I barely thought about her.
There is nothing in DMSI that causes obsession. You'll have to look at other things to explain that.
MLS focuses you on learning, not sex.
Quote:Now, on 3.3 a girl from my gym is on my mind. Then what should I do if I can't target her specifically?
Focusing on a specific person is fine as long as you are not using manifestation methods to influence them. That crosses the line into taking away their freedom of choice, and it is a bad choice of actions for that reason.
Quote:Shannon, this is from DMSI description page: "be aware that it is designed to get you to sexually seduce everyone you want to have sex with."
And you are saying targeting specific people is a bad move. Don't you think these two are conflicting? If not, why?
I am talking about using manifestation and other techniques that take away their free will. Not "I'm attracted to her, so I'll focus my interest on her while I'm on DMSI.
By this logic, wouldn't any seduction at all which is designed to evoke a feeling of attraction from a woman be removing their free will? Wouldn't dmsi itself which is designed to use your sexual aura to create attraction in women who otherwise would not be attracted be removing their free will? I fail to see how having a specific target would be any different to general targets that are affected by your aura.
Turning super saiyan.