08-25-2018, 09:43 AM
(08-25-2018, 07:53 AM)bits Wrote:(08-24-2018, 02:11 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again).
I thought v1 was pretty impressive, didn't 3 guys lose their virginity on it in the first week or so?
If V1 was so impressive, we wouldn't have bothered with V2. or 2.x. Or 3.x.
I just want to be clear Shannon, I'm not advocating a return to v1 scripting - i just thought v1 was impressive enough at it's own but I realize not everyone executed that.
But again, I am NOT suggesting a return to v1.
I'm just wondering if you ever thought about a version without any extras. The reason I ask is because I've noticed a lot of the guys not getting results also tend to have some MGTOW/redpill views on women - not all of them have expressed that but some have.
While those groups are correct on some things, they apply all extremes to all women and I can't help but wonder how that's affecting the results especially with filters and snipers.
In the MGTOW/redpill world, a low quality woman is often viewed as one who:
-is not a virgin
-is on social media
-likes to flirt with men
-cares about how much money a guy makes
-has feminist views
-is over the age of 30
If DMSI has a filter that is understood by the unconscious as "low quality women" and a guy has mgtow/redpill views on women he's pretty much eliminating 99% of women from ever being effected.
There is no such filter. There is a design to cause the program to focus most on those people you find most attractive sexually, according to how sexually attractive they are to you.
Quote:It's the same thing with a snipers, it was a long time ago (2.1?) when you mentioned the exact parameters but I remember something along the lines of it targeting women who were mature, self actualized, confident, non-needy, and compatible on a spiritual, emotional, and mental level (or something along those lines) and just remember thinking to myself "no such woman under the age of 60 exists" which obviously isn't true, but I do believe 90%+ of women (and men) under 30 would be disqualified which is probably the age range of most DMSI users.
Your memory is not in line with what is in DMSI. It's designed to cause you to rate each individual along about 63 different considerations, according to how attractive that individual is to you on that specific consideration, and then react accordingly. So if her intelligence really matters to you, and she's really dumb, you won't rate her high on intelligence and the program will be less responsive to her; but at the same time, if her (pick a physical feature) is really, really attractive to you, you will rate that very highly and the program will again react accordingly.
Quote:Then there is all of the extra things that aren't directly related to the aura, things like caffeine, hormone optimization, etc and what effects that has on DMSI. These are unlikely to have as much effect as filters/snipers on DMSI execution as they are for the users own sake but they must still be having an effect. For example hormone optimization, all hormones start off with cholesterol of which 80% is produced in the liver but some people have issues can't produce enough so their body shifts away from optimal hormone levels to necessary hormone levels in order to balance out other things like metabolism, collagen growth, wound/injury repair, etc. For such a person to execute the hormone optimization part of the scripts would result in tiredness, brain fog, and very little extra energy for the aura to use.
Caffeine isn't in the script. The script does have a module designed to cause you to shift state to the optimal state of mind for successfully achieving the goals of the program, which is tied to a module designed to "autopilot" you to the goal. Caffeine, alcohol, nicotine and recreational drugs all physically override that state shifting and interfere with it and autopilot. Probably not as much as your fears, but they do.
Everything that has gone into DMSI is a subsystem that supports achieving the end goal of the program. Autopiloting, state shifting, hormone optimization (which results in the appropriate amount of the hormones that make you sexually active and attractive, such as testosterone for men, and estrogen for women, which also helps you be active and more attractive, plus aids the pheromone optimizer, and which negative side effects of have been removed by not just the OE, but specifically a module designed to do that), etc. Everything in the script is a support system and a step to achieving the goals of the program. We don't take one giant step just because you're projecting an aura, we are using every possible step up we can all at once.
Quote:I know you don't implement every request, and I'm guilty of suggesting my own requests, but there must have been at least 100+ requests by now and I'm estimating that you've added at least 10 of them to DMSI plus all the extras that you've added on your own accord. I just can't help but wonder what effect it's all having.
The effect it's having is that every version of the program is getting better, more powerful, more successful, more effective.
It may not always look that way, but here's what's happening.
For some people, it's enough, and they achieve the design goals.
For some people, it triggers some fears and some execution. These people get some results, but their fears hold them back.
For some people, it triggers more and more fear, and they get "no results" or they get small results that they then either shut down, deny happened, etc.
Each version brings us closer to the goal, and thus more and more fear is being generated as a result, which means more and more resistance. So for example, 3.2 achieved the design goal more than 3.1, but a lot of guys report less good results from 3.2 which shows MORE resistance because the program is MORE powerful and MORE likely to achieve the design goal, which triggers MORE fear, and thus MORE resistance. But what most of you see is, "3.2 isn't as good as 3.1 was, we're going backwards". No, we're going forwards, and this produces more of a desire to escape that fact, stonewall, etc.
This is also why in 3.3, I must primarily deal with the fear removal aspect of it, because right now, there isn't much else we can do while we have not dealt with that aspect of it. In spite of the theories some of you have, it is fear and only fear that now separates us from complete success. Yes, there is improvement to be made in various other directions like energy sourcing and auric modulation, but even right now, if I was to successfully add fear removal to 3.2 and call it 3.3, and that fear removal worked, the program would be good enough that we wouldn't have to keep going.
And that's what I am expecting from 3.3, that we won't really need to keep going except to make it the best it can possibly be for most of you. I know that 3.4 will be a step up from 3.3 (unless I spend a long time building 3.3), and depending on how things work out, if there is a 4.0, that it will be better than 3.3/3.4, whichever is the end of the 3.x branch. That's not necessarily because 3.3/3.4 don't work, but because they don't work as well as they could. My goal in all this is the best possible 6G skeleton script. Otherwise I would have trashed DMSI long ago as not worth my time and just started building subs and dealt with whatever refund requests we got.
I want the absolute best 6G possible, so I have stuck it out, even when sometimes I wanted to pull my (non-existent) hair out, quit, etc.
Things are not always what they appear to be at face value, as you can see by how it looks at a glance like things are going backwards, when in fact they are advancing. Each step reveals more of what stands in the way of success, and each step shows me how to take the next step, but it is always a step forward.
You as well as everyone else will simply have to trust that I know what I am talking about and that I know what I am doing, and we will allow the results to speak for themselves when the time comes.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!