art of war subs

[substance2016]

It'd be interesting to see how this would work simply because of the weird results mindset it takes. You don't see a thing but victory as the outcome for the drive and conviction, but you also need to know how to properly recover from when you lose and be able to see that you didn't lose at all but are simply delayed. I've always loved the art of war.

by victory i meant a highly positive outcome - not necessarily a fight - i only said it broadly, needs to be worded properly - as such descriptive words are misleading and mean different things and different degrees to different people, the art of war has no specifics involved, hence it is applicable widely - if you read the book 33 strategies of war you would understand that those principles are timeless in a social setting

Oh I know. Fight, conflict, interaction, competition, exchange, however you want to frame it the desire is to come out ahead.

there would be no weird outcomes because, it would involve correct strategic perception, analysis, and action (in accordance with the short or long term vision) and there are principles governing these that the book 33- strategies mentions. it depends upon how it is designed