10-16-2015, 05:33 PM
Quote: I would love to see the comparison with AM6.
Two people both new to the sub,
1 person running 32 days per stage = 192 days
1 person 10 days per stage, 3 times through = 180 days
I'd be happy to bet the person benefiting the most would be the one who ran it 3 times.
why?
changes introduced, quick ascending to next stage = less stagnating, less looking around for change (which a lot of us have done in our journals), then a complete reinforcement on the 2nd and the 3rd run
Hey Minititan! these are some excellent ideas to explore, and you put foward a lot of good points.
I too am thinking if for our 3rd+ runs wouldn't we benefit more doing shorter runs? I mean ive gone through some serious resistance on my first and 2nd runs of Am6, and i think the 32 days were needed.
But i also think for a 3rd run doing some experimenting with less days should not be discarded only because the 32 days are set on stone. There is always a better way i think, we just need to find it. Im thinking not just 10 days because that might be too short, but something like 16 days and 2 runthroughs would be awesome.
