(10-09-2015, 08:51 AM)Dzemoo Wrote: if you think like this catman why you always argued with me that you dont understand why i think am5 is better, you said something like am6 has much more stuff in it which makes it better so i am suprised by your post because am5 has a ten times smaller script
i have also read in your journal that you said you think sm3 is missing some suggestions you need to make it work for you so its pretty confusing your post
Hi Dzemoo,
I don't know about "always argued", but my comment above was directed towards the magnets in particular, two programs I feel at present that success is elusive with. Even with 5G and lots of hours per stage. I view the magnets as more difficult to achieve success with than AM, and I think it goes beyond the AM foundation issue. Replacing decades of very limited narrow thinking, painful memories, defeatist faulty ingrained thinking in regards to women and sex seems to be far more difficult to remove and replace than the more easier to remove and replace self-focused issues that AM covers. I feel this is the difference in the success rates, one focuses on you, one focuses outward. The one focused on you seems to be easier to be successful with, the one focused on outward results, will be much more difficult to achieve success with by it's outward-focused nature IMO. With AM6 you can get success with it without really interacting with others for example, it's working on you internally. With the magnets, no matter how it's rationalised, in the end, if you don't have sex with women, it hasn't been a successful run. I think then, by their very purpose, the magnets have a WAY harder task to achieve for you. So, IMO it's paramount to limit the amount of changes to those two program's scripts when 6G occurs, in order to drastically bump up the WPS so all the statements can be spammed a lot more often and we can drastically increase the success rates of the program to the level AM currently enjoys. Otherwise, we run into the issue I described earlier, Shannon getting into a war of attrition with himself. If we keep the script as close as possible to what it is now for each magnet, and dramatically increase the WPS, that will end up being much higher success rates for the first run, as well as less reruns ever needed. That's my approach to it. Only when it's virtually a guarantee to be super successful with the program, should we start adding more modules.
I feel AM6 is a program that at present has very high success rates in comparison to the magnets, and may be open to SOME more material added in to increase it's functionality. I would like more confidence in there as Shannon toned it down for AM6 and I missed the intoxicating ASC 5G confidence I had beforehand as I ran that just before my AM6 run and felt that is a downside of the current program. Besides that confidence boost and EHPRA 2.0 replacing EHPRA 1.0 in every stage being a no-brainer excellent upgrade, I really don't think AM7 would need anything else. AM6 is already a very solid, well built program that has delivered reliable high results from most of this forum. My opinions on the 3 programs, AM6 and WM2 and SM3, and their success rates is just merely by being a member of the forum and viewing the journals over time. I think we can all see the difference in success rates between AM and the magnets.
The magnets and the disparity of success with them compared to AM was my post's focus, Dzemoo. I think me making that slight mention of AM in my post maybe made you believe I was putting AM in the same category as the magnets, hence your post. That isn't the case, I view the magnets as much more difficult to achieve success with in their current form. And that's the reason I think something along the lines of those minimal changes I outlined should be done. Then, they should be left alone and with a much higher WPS figure, those statements will have a much higher success rate and all will benefit. Only then, when success is pretty much guaranteed with the program, should more things be added. I think it's a better approach to do things that way, then continously add things when people aren't getting success reliably yet as is. Get the program hitting homeruns for pretty much everybody, THEN add more modules.
I hope things make more sense now, Dzemoo.
